Rick Fischer
2nd January 2022, 02:29 PM
Hiyas all
After mating engine and GB, did hook up clutch a la WS manual but it would not operate due to much lost motion in the operating shaft through the bell housing. The pins and the piece if drilled pipe connecting it all together had worn severely. (I hadn't looked too critically after the whole transmission was returned after rebuild.) Anyway .............:
Removed all the bits, drilled out the one end of the pipe to take 5/16" pin and ditto the shaft, by product being a much bigger bearing surface, clutch shaft and pipe has virtually no backlash.. Other end of pipe connection had to remain 1/4" pin because of clutch shaft in the bell housing.
Pipe connection was repaired with filler rod and re drilled to 1/4" and new pin manufactured. All were re-assembled to chassis and bell housing with very little rotary backlash.
However, when all coupled up with the pedal and bell-cranks there would appear to still be a lot of lost motion. On the first picture notice how compressed the spring is and how much thread there is at the bell-crank end. While I have the pressure plate and the throw-out seeming to work there will be little "life" adjustment left. That is with new clutch and pressure plates.
Third photo shows pedal height resting throw out bearing on pressure plate. It is pretty close to the 20mm specified in WS manual, and after a bit of fiddling and diddling with connecting rods I think I'll make that but no adjustment left. ?????????
176048176049176053
Questions
1. in the first photo:
Note the amount of thread already used in the adjustment; and
what purpose does the spring shown serve? Further adjustment will simply cause it to be "spring bound". It appears to serve no purpose. In drawings of later model it is omitted.
2. To compensate for the lost motion I could drill the shaft to take a pin around 30 degrees past vertical so that the shaft crank hangs vertical or a bit fwd of vertical at that point. Comment?
What might be wrong?
While I can make it all work or work better, Should I? Is this the way they are/were?
Cheers
Rick F
After mating engine and GB, did hook up clutch a la WS manual but it would not operate due to much lost motion in the operating shaft through the bell housing. The pins and the piece if drilled pipe connecting it all together had worn severely. (I hadn't looked too critically after the whole transmission was returned after rebuild.) Anyway .............:
Removed all the bits, drilled out the one end of the pipe to take 5/16" pin and ditto the shaft, by product being a much bigger bearing surface, clutch shaft and pipe has virtually no backlash.. Other end of pipe connection had to remain 1/4" pin because of clutch shaft in the bell housing.
Pipe connection was repaired with filler rod and re drilled to 1/4" and new pin manufactured. All were re-assembled to chassis and bell housing with very little rotary backlash.
However, when all coupled up with the pedal and bell-cranks there would appear to still be a lot of lost motion. On the first picture notice how compressed the spring is and how much thread there is at the bell-crank end. While I have the pressure plate and the throw-out seeming to work there will be little "life" adjustment left. That is with new clutch and pressure plates.
Third photo shows pedal height resting throw out bearing on pressure plate. It is pretty close to the 20mm specified in WS manual, and after a bit of fiddling and diddling with connecting rods I think I'll make that but no adjustment left. ?????????
176048176049176053
Questions
1. in the first photo:
Note the amount of thread already used in the adjustment; and
what purpose does the spring shown serve? Further adjustment will simply cause it to be "spring bound". It appears to serve no purpose. In drawings of later model it is omitted.
2. To compensate for the lost motion I could drill the shaft to take a pin around 30 degrees past vertical so that the shaft crank hangs vertical or a bit fwd of vertical at that point. Comment?
What might be wrong?
While I can make it all work or work better, Should I? Is this the way they are/were?
Cheers
Rick F