PDA

View Full Version : Part quality, is it just me ?



Phil 850
19th May 2024, 10:01 PM
I have been replacing parts of my 1982 RRC as I repair/rebuild it but I have had a few issues.

1. The rear trailing arm suspension bushes where the three bolts attach them to the chassis did not line up.
I contacted the retailer and he passed on my concerns to the manufacturer and there response was that my calculations were correct and the parts they make did not match their original OEM part that they copied from, and were surprised as they have sold thousands of them.
I was advised to grind the holes till the fasteners fit and they will still warrant the parts.
They didn’t advise if they are going to fix their tooling to ensure future parts are correct.
190157 Original part, 87 mm.
190158 Replacement pat, 89 mm.

2. My original fuel sender was not working so I bought a replacement one.
190159
I ordered one identical to the bottom (corroded) one but they sent me the top one.
The replacement one doesn’t have an inlet filter and has different electrical connections.
Their response was that I can fit the filter off my old one and I can slide the sleeves back on the connectors and they will fit.
With no alternative, I connected the sender to my harness prior to fitting it to the tank just to test that everything worked.
Turned the ignition on and the gauge shows empty. Raise the float and the fuel gauge shows full.[smilebigeye]
Lower the float to the bottom (empty) position and the Low Fuel warning light did not come on.
Connected the low fuel connector of the harness to earth and the fuel light comes on, so there is a sender issue.
On closer inspection, there isn’t a wiper and contact in the sender for the low fuel warning light. There is a track to the terminal but nothing to provide a circuit.
190160
So much for this being the “equivalent” part.

3. While I wait for the fuel sender issue response I decided to fit the new fuel tank that I bought to replace the very rusty one I had.
It fitted in well until I decided to block off the fuel return line from the carburettor. The previous owner fitted a 350 Holley with no return line.
The original connection is 3/4” above the seam.
190161
The replacement tank has the connection 1-1/2” above the seam so a return hose is difficult to fit as the chassis cross rail is in the way. [bawl]
190162

Is it really that hard to copy an original part so that they meet the minimum requirements of Form, Fit and Function.
I’m not expecting too much am I

Regards
Phil

Phil 850
19th June 2024, 02:45 PM
The supplier got back to me regarding the sender unit.
And no it doesn’t have the circuit for the Low Fuel Warning Light, but I could still use it for the fuel gauge.
Well, that’s no good to me as I want the Low Fuel Warning Light to work as I paid a significant price for it and as much again for postage from the UK.

What have others used for the Fuel Sender Unit.

Regards
Phil

BradC
19th June 2024, 03:40 PM
Don't suppose they came in a blue box with an 8 letter name ending in "art" ?

TonyC
19th June 2024, 05:33 PM
Unless you've ordered the wrong part, I would be pushing for them to send you the correct part, if they want the old one back, they pay for the postage.

As it's from an overseas supplier, there's probably not mutch you can do if they dig their heels in, but worth a try.

Tony

Phil 850
19th June 2024, 08:47 PM
They are happy to take the part back for a full refund hopefully including postage.
And yes, it was a *****art.
The problem is, it looks like everyone sells the same one [bighmmm]

What alternatives are there.

Phil

350RRC
20th June 2024, 11:49 AM
IME Superpro bushes are superbly designed and made and fit perfectly every time..................which is usually many years apart.

cheers, David L