My 2006 TDV6 HSE

[PBob]

Have just done a bitumen trip of 550km over Christmas, consisting of about 60km of hills and the rest good flat going. Two people, two dogs and a fair bit of luggage, (fridge etc). Dialled in about 108km/ph on the cruise control and turned in 8.8 litres per 100km. Amazing for such a heavy vehicle. It now has done 26,000km. Who says 4wds are gas guzzlers?

[rangieman]

good going mate :D

that is a very impressive figure:eek:

[Franz]

Have just done a bitumen trip of 550km over Christmas, consisting of about 60km of hills and the rest good flat going. Two people, two dogs and a fair bit of luggage, (fridge etc). Dialled in about 108km/ph on the cruise control and turned in 8.8 litres per 100km. Amazing for such a heavy vehicle. It now has done 26,000km. Who says 4wds are gas guzzlers?
Now that's the sort of consumption I'd like to see on my TD5 auto (sigh!)

Cheers,

[100I]

I can only have wet dreams of those sorts of figures:(

[PBob]

I will hook the camper up in april and do some gravel and sand, I'll bet that will change things a fair bit!

[Jamo]

Terrific stuff! I was getting similar figures:D .. then I put on the roof rack and went up to 12l/100km:( .. then I put on the roof top tent:eek: :(

[awabbit6]

It's suprising the difference a roof rack makes. When I put one on my Disco (300tdi), fuel consumption went from a very consistent 8.2L/100km to a very random 9.5ish L/100km. It may have to come off after the holidays.

[lrdef110]

Yes they are amazing really. I returned to Mackay from Sunshine Coast on New Years Day with 4 adults and absolutley chockers with my daughters uni gear. The computer says I averaged 96.7 km/hour (Bruce Highway north of Rocky includes a fair bit of 110km/hr speed limit). Fuel consumption was 9.6 litres/100 km. My best mileage so far with just me in the D3 is 7.9 litres/100km, but mostly in the mid 8's on the highway and up to 10 to 11 around town.

[dungarover]

Who says 4wds are gas guzzlers?

Don't drive my Rangie then.

A sluggish 3.5 EFI fitted with a 'crapper flapper' system, 33' tyres, 4 inches of lift (body and springs overall) ad std gearing, if I get 400 kms from a 110 tank I'm doing bloody well :eek:

Back on topic, that's bloody good fuel economy I must say.

Trav

[cartm58]

a standard 1993 Range Rover with 3.9 4 spped automatic does 5km per litre around Perth 80 litre tank manages 330km before fuel warning light pokes itself on on a country trip sitting on 100kph fuel tank squeezes itself out to 400km or around 17mpg.

[Captain_Rightfoot]

Terrific stuff! I was getting similar figures:D .. then I put on the roof rack and went up to 12l/100km:( .. then I put on the roof top tent:eek: :(
I think that's pretty clearly showing that the engine possibly isn't as fuel efficient than a td5. However, clearly they have made large gains in aerodynamics over the D2. Remember that aerodynamic efficiency isn't as much about shape as minute attention to detail (and particularly under the car).

Our defender uses 11l/100 and it doesn't seem to matter what is strapped to it or what you're doing... that's what it uses (I have seen a occasional 12 and 10 though).

[Jamo]

Too many other factors here to draw conclusions.

Driving mix, prevailing weather conditions, roof rack design etc etc

You can't make any direct comparisons unless you copy conditions exactly.

For instance,

The D3 has a cd of .41. But two cars with the same cd, but of different body design, will be affected differently by altering the air flow.

I live in a fairly windy part of the world (so much so that it regularly attracts events such as world flying 15 championships).

My D3 is kitted out with bullbars, wheel carriers etc and weighs around 3tn, so any extra resistance will have a different effect than for a 2tn car.
Very few things in physics follow linear relationships.

My driving is also a mix of very slow speed stop-start; 110kph hwy driving; and gravel road driving. The fuel figures I've quoted are averages.

TD5 more fuel efficient than a TDV6, who knows! I'd hazard a guess and say no if the two motors were slotted into two identical cars and compared like with like! It's a pity the TDV6 is available in the new fender in order to make a better (although not perfect) comparison.

If you want fuel efficiency, without the rear carrier, aux tank and roof rack; I was getting as low as 7.5l/100km!

[Ace]

Sounds pretty damn good, fully loaded my parents Rav4 wouldnt return those figures with a smaller engine and lighter car.

If you are ever in Lithgow drop me a line before you head over, or let me know and you are welcome to drop in for a chat. Matt

[D110V8D]

Don't drive my Rangie then.

A sluggish 3.5 EFI fitted with a 'crapper flapper' system, 33' tyres, 4 inches of lift (body and springs overall) ad std gearing, if I get 400 kms from a 110 tank I'm doing bloody well :eek:

Back on topic, that's bloody good fuel economy I must say.

Trav

Hang about! I'm getting 400 + (just:angel: ) with carbies and 35's AND a TF727 with a standard 85 or whatever litre tank. Maybe your extra fuel capacity is a false economy.;):D :D

[D110V8D]

:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

I think I'm brain dead actually! My odometer/speedometer hasn't been adjusted. I'm probably getting 200k's to the tank.:( :( :(

[wovenrovings]

With all internal combustion engines there is a range of rpms and loads at which maximum engine efficiency is obtained. If you out side this area you fuel economy will get worse (got to take aerodynamics into account of course). It depends on how the computer is programed too. This is why taller gearing doesn't always give better economy. Sounds to me like LR pretty carefully matched to tuning to stock car.

Basicly i just said there is lots of factors at work:D

WR

[RRV80]

when all shiny, new and efficinet, the 1984 range rover 3sp auto carb engine in std trim unladen was said by LR to have 92.6kw, held 89L of fuel and useage figres were:

Simulated cycle :19.5L/100km
constant 90kph speed :12.2L/100km
constant speen 120kph :15.2L/100km

As quotedfrom the oringal LR owners manual.

so you could say range rover owners are envious of those TDV6 figures.

[jonesy63]

Hi Folks,
I picked up my D3 SE TDV6 on 29/12 (complianced 12/06, MY07) and I have now over 900 km it. I did two trips from Bangor down to Culburra Beach and back, to drop off my daughter for NYE celebrations with her friends. I got 8.8L/100km on the trips. Through light traffic around the suburbs, I was getting about 11L/100km.

They are also sooo quiet and refined... makes my BA XR6 sound and feel like a truck! Am i happy - you bet!
:D:D:D

Cheers,
Rob

[LandyAndy]

I was regularly getting 900 to 1000ks out of BlackBetty(standard 95lt tank),since adding the roofrack(low profile and wind deflector),having the oil in the ECU and the head gasket its around the 600 to 700ks a tank.Once this oil problem is gone,and the flatspot is fixed(Got a set of Tombraiders sillycum intercooler hoses on the way) I hope "normality" returns.
Once "normality" is established Im pretty serious about getting her chipped.Then the Black THING will get a spanking.
I normally treat her real nice and get great economy,one can only dream about 8 to 9 l/100ks and working at the same time.
Wish for 6 numbers and a D3 is yours:cool: :cool: :cool:
Andrew