PDA

View Full Version : Antenna mounting



cmart2007
24th February 2007, 01:14 PM
Has anyone mounted a UHF antenna on D1 spare wheel and how?:)

waynep
24th February 2007, 02:40 PM
i've seen a couple done .....
i know a guy in melbourne who will make up a bracket for it ...if you want his details pm me....happy to have him use my car as a template.

loanrangie
24th February 2007, 03:09 PM
I am toying with the same idea, i have a replacement spare wheel carrier as mine lost one of the studs before i got it. any pics will be welcome.

regards,
Nick.

p38arover
24th February 2007, 03:34 PM
Ditto. I don't have a bullbar any more so the antenna is on a bracket that sticks out of the grille. To remove the grille requires dismantling the antenna.

The main unit for the CB is in the spare wheel well at the back with a cable that runs all the way to the front. It might be better with the antenna at the back.

Range may be affected, however.

Ron

dmdigital
24th February 2007, 04:45 PM
There used to be a good guide to just this on Expedition Exchange's web site but it seems to be gone. Google Firestick antenna and Discovery, you might find something.

cmart2007
25th February 2007, 08:36 AM
Thanks, that would be great if you could do that many thanks
Chris

dmdigital
25th February 2007, 08:47 AM
Here's the link to Firestick, the EE link doesn't work and I can't find anything else on it. At least this gives some idea of the bracket etc.

http://www.firestik.com/Tech_Docs/discovery.htm

waynep
25th February 2007, 05:31 PM
Ditto. I don't have a bullbar any more so the antenna is on a bracket that sticks out of the grille. To remove the grille requires dismantling the antenna.

The main unit for the CB is in the spare wheel well at the back with a cable that runs all the way to the front. It might be better with the antenna at the back.

Range may be affected, however.

Ron

The shorter you can get the antenna cable the better. This is because the coax cable is quite "lossy". So if you have your radio "brick" mounted in the back, having the antenna back there also makes sense.
Mounting the antenna on the back also keeps it away from all the "noise" generated in the engine bay. This is not so crucial for the FM UHF CB, but makes a big difference on HF SSB ( eg VKS737 ) or AM CB.
The simple antennas, with the black plastic base and whip, need a good "ground plane" to work properly. If you need to mount a UHF CB antenna anywhere other than the centre of roof , you should use an "independent ground plane" antenna. These are the ones you see with the shiny chrome or alloy tube about 30cm long and 2cm wide at the bottom, and the whip on top. Quite a few peopel make them - even Super Cheep have them. Make sure you get one for the UHF CB band.
If mounting on the back, as long as the whip section is above the roofline of the car, you'll find these work very well.
I'm quite amazed by some of the antenna mounting postions I've seen - down on the bumper and /or 3 inches away from other antennas. It's should be high as possible and unobstructed. I know in bush driving it's a compromise. I have mine mounted on the roof bar with one of those spring bases and have never lost it ( yet !)

Bush65
25th February 2007, 08:15 PM
I have an antenna bracket on the spare wheel carrier of my disco I.

The bracket was manufactured from 2 lengths of pipe/tube and flat bar.

The vertical pipe has 2 flat bar lugs welded to it and protruding to the left to suit the top and bottom bolts that mount the spare wheel carrier to the door.

A horizontal pipe is welded to the vertical pipe, about 100mm above the top bolt for the spare wheel carrier to form a tee shape.

The right end of the tee has a bracket on the end for the antenna. It extends far enough to clear the tyre. It is braced by a flat bar that is welded between the rh end of the horizontal pipe and the bottom of the vertical pipe.

The left end of the tee is bent to clear the rear screen wiper and tyre and extends across the the left side of the spare wheel carrier. A vertical flat bar welded to the end runs down to the spare wheel carrier which is drilled to suit a mounting bolt.

p38arover
25th February 2007, 10:34 PM
The shorter you can get the antenna cable the better.

Yes, I know I should (I am a qualified radio tech - I even have a BOCP) but, like most people, mounting take precedence over radiation pattern. :)

I only run UHF and I'm currently using a ground independent antenna. I've probably got around 5-7 metres of RG58C/U which has a loss of about 2-3 dB at 477 MHz.

I guess by moving the antenna to the rear, I could reduce the loss to about 1.5dB but will the radiation pattern be worse? I don't have the test equipment ot measure it.

Ron

p38arover
26th February 2007, 05:18 PM
Mounting pic from Expedition Exchange. Bracket bolted to wheel mount.

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2007/02/31.jpg

waynep
27th February 2007, 01:02 AM
Yes, I know I should (I am a qualified radio tech - I even have a BOCP) but, like most people, mounting take precedence over radiation pattern. :)

I only run UHF and I'm currently using a ground independent antenna. I've probably got around 5-7 metres of RG58C/U which has a loss of about 2-3 dB at 477 MHz.

I guess by moving the antenna to the rear, I could reduce the loss to about 1.5dB but will the radiation pattern be worse? I don't have the test equipment ot measure it.

Ron

Sorry if I sounded patronising - wasn't trying to be. I didn't know you were a tech. Anyway glad to meet another radio tech on here:). I've been "off the tools" for many a year now and stuck behind a desk ( unfortunately :().

As you'd know ( but others reading this may not ) if you have 3db loss in your cable you lose half your transmit power between your radio and the antenna ( ie from 5 watts down to 2.5 watts. ) so if you can get the length down below 3 metres or so, that's gotta be a good thing don't it ?.

now, radiation pattern, as long as the antenna whip is entirely above the roofline, it should be fairly omnidirectional. More importantly, it would be good and high, and as you know UHF is "line of sight" so the higher the better.

With the antenna whip low down behind the back door as in the pic earlier I would say the radiation pattern and antenna efficiency will be c**p - quite frankly.

Above the roofline, there is the problem of it hitting branches etc but IMHO on the bullbar it hits plenty of things too !

I've seen quite a few antennas just "fall off" bullbars, possibly due to the "resonance" effect set up, causing metal fatigue.

Sticking up above the roof may be a problem in carparks etc, but if it is on a spring base you can bend it over and hold it down wih a bungee cord or something.

you're right - with radio as in life, it's always a compromise between performance and convenience !!

JES
27th February 2007, 08:52 AM
Perhaps use a bracket similar to the pic Ron posted, but add telescopic pole that can be lifted when better performance is required, and dropped when going through carparks etc.

Bush65
27th February 2007, 06:56 PM
Here are some pics of my bracket. Designed for the load from a HF autotune antenna.

My autotune is on the bullbar for the moment. The extra bracket for the reverse light was made to be a spacer so the autotune will clear the 33" spare tyre.

The spacer between the spare wheel mount and the door, is only to compensate for the dent in the door (from reversing misshap with spare tyre).

JDNSW
27th February 2007, 07:18 PM
I'll just put in my oar here. Firstly, for the record, both my Landrovers have the UHF antenna mounted on the bullbar, like almost all work vehicles have round here. For my use, seems to work perfectly well. The advantage of the bullbar is you can see it about to hit something! Not like the antenna on the roof of my tractor, which is now bent to near horizontal after a brush with overhanging shrubbery (out of sight, out of mind). Mind you, it still works!

One of the things you need to consider is that UHF is almost purely line of sight - which means that greater effective radiated power is of little use except that it enables you to talk over the top of others. So radiation pattern is a lot more important than loss in your transmission line. Same sort of thing with the VHF on my yacht - the additional line loss with moving the antenna to the masthead is irrelevant compared to the extra ten metres or so height. Also consider one of the nuisances we get here occasionally is the ultralight aircraft using "our" UHF channel - they come through very well from over a hundred miles at ten thousand feet, using 1w handhelds!

So by far the best place for your UHF is in the middle of the roof, but since your range is mostly going to be limited by the nearest hill, unless it is in a very bad location, you probably won't notice the difference.

John

Signal1
14th September 2009, 10:21 AM
Here is to resurrecting an old thread...

Mounted to the front of my Disco by way of an ARB B/Bar is an elevated ground independant UHF antenna ( 5dB ) on spring mount and a VHF whip.

I was thinking of making a bracket of the rear wheel mount and having another lot of mounting points so I can move the antennas to the back when on trips and wanting more range hopefully achieved by being higher from the vehicle.

Question is - Does anyone know what should be the minimum distance seperating the two antennas? The UHF is 5W, the VHF 25W. I have been advised that the 25W will interfer with the UHF when transmitting but can't confirm this. Currently they wouldn't be more than 600mm apart I should think...the distance between the two tabs on the ARB b/bar.

The coax run to the rear may be only one metre more than to the front so I'm not too concerned with power loss...or should i?

Thanks in advance.

mousie
15th September 2009, 07:35 PM
Just finished a small lathe job with 60mm solid reducing down to the 49mm wheel hole and then further reductions and polish off. Cabling through the mag and into the vehicle. Easily mated with the yaesu 857 located inside right storage bin and led remote press button to activate tune cycle in the headlight adjustment panel which area was vacant (behind cover). Remote head in roof mount above front interior light. Works a hoot for me as a ham. I found an old sell call 8422 box and these easily mate to the radio as well if you can find one via the paket connector for permanent or semi permanent if you need, (just turn radio volume down) as sell call is fixed audio out.

The Yaesu was selected as cheaper than icom, less current draw in receive, also can make extension cables rather than icom only stuff. Wanted and Icom so would have built in either as both reliable.

Yaesu and icom tune interfaces can be found on their groups site and does work very well. I know there are negatives but I just wanted to put the autotune on for a couple of trips a year and remove radio when finished with the harness left in tact. I'm an old believer in stick as well and back with the series one, I just used the fishing reel with copper line which really meant I was in for a roasting by others until I fired it up and before the women used it for clothes line!!!!

The downside with ham in the TD5, depending on your luck is injector noise!!! and I'm not alone here with ebay coming to the rescue for 'ferrite' packs way cheaper than Jaycar. On this subject you need to get mix 31 material but most ferrite's don't tell you what material they are. Another site on this forum shows the areas for install if your having RFI. Hope this assists with a mounting option for larger HF stuff. Geoff

mousie
15th September 2009, 07:49 PM
Hi Signal1 and just read your post above mine again. I forgot the calculations re freq and close proximity of aerials and in crude terms when close, one or the other can act as either the reflector or director from the driven antenna to become directional and you TV antenna is generally works this way. So when you see the certain folk that lineup 3+ antennas up in a row, I have a chuckle given they can render the whole show as ineffective in theory. Having said this, vehicles are a compromise anyway so if you can get distance and practical then you will be fine.

End of the day, quality components at UHF with some understanding of different antenna types from say 30 minute read on the net will result in a good to very good setup. Particularly if you can get your hands on full shield rg58 quality cabling and not the crappy stuff.

For example my preference after a lot of signal testing on vehicles was the RFI ground independent geting around 4 - 4.5db rubber duck styles you see on commercials in the city. Need to cut correctly and no soldering required at base as just a fixed end length of centre conducter for transfer of signal. Bullet proof cheap design for all round use.

Series 1 disco using a gutter mount was always a tune nightmare for me so I avoided this area after a few failed attempts.

Hope this helps

Geoff