spudboy
10th June 2008, 08:58 AM
I am looking at buying 3.9 RR Classic with a 5-spd and was wondering if having the manual transmission gives better mileage than the auto.
I had a '93 RRC auto 5 or so years ago and that got about 18 to 19L/100 from memory (a tank would last about 350-400Km). It improved marginally after I fitted extractors, but apart from the nice sound was probably not worth the cost of the extractors.
Is it wishful thinking to imagine the manual might do better?
I had a '93 RRC auto 5 or so years ago and that got about 18 to 19L/100 from memory (a tank would last about 350-400Km). It improved marginally after I fitted extractors, but apart from the nice sound was probably not worth the cost of the extractors.
Is it wishful thinking to imagine the manual might do better?