Log in

View Full Version : HDR software


Slunnie
29th December 2008, 02:06 PM
Up until recently I thought HDR was the domain of Photoshop, though clearly I haven't used google.

Is there freeby or shareware programs that will do HDR or is it a matter of digging deep?
vnx205
29th December 2008, 02:12 PM
Try here

Hdr Freeware - Free Downloads - Freeware (http://www.supershareware.com/get/free/hdr.html)

or here

Shuttertalk - News (http://www.shuttertalk.com/news.php?article=7093)

or several other places.

So the short answer is yes.
dullbird
29th December 2008, 02:18 PM
anyone know whether these freeware programs are stable with vista
Slunnie
29th December 2008, 02:18 PM
Thanks so much for this! Looks like it'll be time shortly to start bracketing. :D
Slunnie
29th December 2008, 02:19 PM
anyone know whether these freeware programs are stable with vista
Not sure. I'm on Vista also, but I'll just wait and see what happens.
dmdigital
29th December 2008, 05:36 PM
anyone know whether these freeware programs are stable with vista
NOTHING IS STABLE on Vista:p
dullbird
29th December 2008, 05:37 PM
yeh yeh what ever!
Slunnie
29th December 2008, 05:44 PM
NOTHING IS STABLE on Vista:p
So true. If its not one thing its another. I don't think even Vista is stable on Vista. :mad:
discomuzz
29th December 2008, 05:50 PM
Windows 3.11 for Work Groups was the ONLY stable Microsoft operating system.

IMHO!
Slunnie
29th December 2008, 05:57 PM
NT was good for me.
hoadie72
29th December 2008, 05:59 PM
Windows 3.11 for Work Groups was the ONLY stable Microsoft operating system.

IMHO!
You don't remember the old General Protection Fault?
Slunnie
29th December 2008, 06:02 PM
ok, in that case the most stable was either DOS or XtreeProGold. :D
discomuzz
29th December 2008, 06:08 PM
You don't remember the old General Protection Fault?

Yeah, but if you stripped the sucker down you could minimise the problems.

Windows95 screwed the whole thing. I couldn't be bothered with tuning anything after that.

Remember the saying, "Windows95 = Apple '87"?
discomuzz
29th December 2008, 06:09 PM
ok, in that case the most stable was either DOS or XtreeProGold. :D

Bingo!!!

Loved Xtree!

Love Command Line Interfaces!

So economical.
dmdigital
29th December 2008, 06:27 PM
VMS, RSTS, MUMPS, CPM, PICOS (provided you had a UPS) where all very stable.

As for freeware stability on Vista, who knows I think its a case of "try it and see what happens".
discomuzz
29th December 2008, 06:31 PM
VMS, RSTS, MUMPS, CPM, PICOS (provided you had a UPS) where all very stable.

As for freeware stability on Vista, who knows I think its a case of "try it and see what happens".

I remember the war between CPM, DR DOS and MS DOS.

Very sus. that the rest were PC Operating Systems.

(Mainframe OSs are NOT FAIR)
dmdigital
29th December 2008, 06:41 PM
I remember the war between CPM, DR DOS and MS DOS.

Very sus. that the rest were PC Operating Systems.

(Mainframe OSs are NOT FAIR)

Just think of PDP-11's as bulky PC's:p
discomuzz
29th December 2008, 07:14 PM
Just think of PDP-11's as bulky PC's:p

Amazing isn't it!

I remember setting up a TAFE college here in Melbourne with 1 x 386DX-33 with a 20Mb HDD as a file server with 20 x 286-16's with 10 Mb HDD's hanging off it for a class room for teaching I.T. State of the art!!!

For about a semester!

Now my mobile phone has a 4 Gb MicroSD card that, if I want, can be pushed to 16Gb.

The thing itself has 160Mb internal!

Correct me if I am wrong, but, aren't MSDOS based p.c's still locked into 640k?