View Full Version : Where to put the winch vehicle?
B92 8NW
10th January 2009, 08:52 PM
Two 4x4s go for a drive, one with a winch. Does the one with the winch go first or follow the car without the winch?
Slunnie
10th January 2009, 08:56 PM
I think its better for the winched vehicle to go first.
If they need to progess the winch vehicle can pull itself through, and then pull the winchless through. If the winched vehicle gets stuck an the decision is to abort, then the winchless vehicle can pull it back out.
moose
10th January 2009, 08:56 PM
Who's got the most experience? Where are you going? Are you parking parallel or diagonal at safeway?:D
dmdigital
10th January 2009, 10:05 PM
Who's got the most experience? Where are you going? Are you parking parallel or diagonal at safeway?:D
:Rolling::Rolling::Rolling:
dullbird
10th January 2009, 10:13 PM
also which end has the best recovery points
but agree with Slunnie
tony
10th January 2009, 10:26 PM
also which end has the best recovery points
Front
Depends how you set the car up with your recovery points...
T
dullbird
10th January 2009, 10:36 PM
I wasn't asking a question tony....I was making a statement.
for example some people don't have bull bars but have a recovery hitch on the back would be silly to put a winch car up the front if there are no recovery points
and vis versa
Blknight.aus
10th January 2009, 10:37 PM
depends on your purpose.
If you absolutely have to get from A-B then the winch vehicle goes in front and you just take pot luck that should the second vehicle need recovering forwards that you can find somewhere to get turned around to be able to use the winch. If running this way always winch through something you suspect is going to cause you trouble enough to require winching because if you break the winch by asking it to pull the now stuck vehicle through the troublesome section you are officially pooched, especially if youve already been winching to get there.
If you're traveling as recon or can backtrack as needed and have alternate routes (obviously this isnt the case if your planning a winchathon circut)
put the vehicle with the winch where it can be used.....
if the winch is front mounted put another vehicle in front of it, its absolutely pointless having the winch pointed where it cant be used. if the lead vehicle gets stuck you can recover it backwards this is very hard to do if the lead vehicle has the winch and is bogged up to the headlights.
thats generally how I set it up anyway
B92 8NW
10th January 2009, 10:47 PM
thats generally how I set it up anyway
Me too, well in this case.
Thanks for all the ideas people:D.
tony
10th January 2009, 11:15 PM
,,sorry Lue you didnt post the first post, that was a question...teach me to look closer
Dave I disagree the whinch vehicle should go in front...you dont have to turn it around to winch a vehicle behind you, and if you have any idia what your doing (and this pre supposes you do or you wouldnt be out there ) your not gonna get stuck up to the headlights anyway...
T
Slunnie
10th January 2009, 11:29 PM
depends on your purpose.
If you absolutely have to get from A-B then the winch vehicle goes in front and you just take pot luck that should the second vehicle need recovering forwards that you can find somewhere to get turned around to be able to use the winch. If running this way always winch through something you suspect is going to cause you trouble enough to require winching because if you break the winch by asking it to pull the now stuck vehicle through the troublesome section you are officially pooched, especially if youve already been winching to get there.
If you're traveling as recon or can backtrack as needed and have alternate routes (obviously this isnt the case if your planning a winchathon circut)
put the vehicle with the winch where it can be used.....
if the winch is front mounted put another vehicle in front of it, its absolutely pointless having the winch pointed where it cant be used. if the lead vehicle gets stuck you can recover it backwards this is very hard to do if the lead vehicle has the winch and is bogged up to the headlights.
thats generally how I set it up anyway
You military people need to start buying snatch straps.... or are they called straps kinetic. :lol2:
Tombie
10th January 2009, 11:31 PM
There is no wrong or right answer.....:D
Lead vehicle descending into a gully... I'd have the 2nd vehicle up top with a winch in case it had to be pulled backwards...
Or if it was being lowered down!
Ascending... I'd usually go winch first... But I carry enough recovery gear that I can get the rope far enough up a hill to recover from below anyhow...
Most often when I go out alone... well the winch is "right there"..... so doesnt matter....
Apart from a silly attempt at a mud hole I shouldnt have tried anyway, and sliding into a gully that was muddy from the rain I have never worried about the winch..
However, the gully recovery pointed out a strong point....
The vehicle(s) at the top of the hill didnt have winches.... But they were a great anchor point ;) If I'd been solo, I doubt even my Ground Anchor would have got me out of it.
B92 8NW
10th January 2009, 11:37 PM
You military people need to start buying snatch straps.... or are they called straps kinetic. :lol2:
For this exercise you will require:
one times strap, kinetic.
ahh school days:angel:.
Tombie
10th January 2009, 11:51 PM
Where would I put the winch?
Near Slunnies' Rig.... You just know he's gunna try something stupid and get stuck again :angel:
Tombie
10th January 2009, 11:54 PM
For this exercise you will require:
one times strap, kinetic.
ahh school days:angel:.
For R&R you should locate...
one times snatch, preferably kinetic
:wasntme:
B92 8NW
11th January 2009, 12:01 AM
For R&R you should locate...
one times snatch, preferably kinetic
:wasntme:
rofl:D
Slunnie
11th January 2009, 12:05 AM
Where would I put the winch?
Near Slunnies' Rig.... You just know he's gunna try something stupid and get stuck again :angel:
Oh man! I was doing a mental tally of the last 12months damage from 4WDing after a mate put his Paj on its roof, wheels, roof, wheels yesterday... :no2:
Why do we do this again? :unsure:
hmmm, dunno. But we do. :banana:
dmdigital
11th January 2009, 12:29 AM
The other solution is to carry a Tirfor in the other vehicle.
...or not get the car stuck on the bolards in the car parking.
leeds
11th January 2009, 12:53 AM
I wasn't asking a question tony....I was making a statement.
for example some people don't have bull bars but have a recovery hitch on the back would be silly to put a winch car up the front if there are no recovery points
and vis versa
IF they do not have good recovery points front AND back they should not be out playing! Also tie down points are NOT recovery points.
With the 110 and the hybrid I can winch both forwards and backwards. (Well need to fit that new wire to the hybrid winch first). Don't you just love a smart ****? :p
Regards
Brendan
Slunnie
11th January 2009, 01:31 AM
IF they do not have good recovery points front AND back they should not be out playing! Also tie down points are NOT recovery points.
With the 110 and the hybrid I can winch both forwards and backwards. (Well need to fit that new wire to the hybrid winch first). Don't you just love a smart ****? :p
Regards
Brendan
It is a real situation in not having a full deck of recovery points with many touring 4WD's, something that has been exacerbated now by bullbar manufacturers reluctance to build in recovery points.
dmdigital
11th January 2009, 01:57 AM
It is a real situation in not having a full deck of recovery points with many touring 4WD's, something that has been exacerbated now by bullbar manufacturers reluctance to build in recovery points.
That's because the bar is attached to the crush cans and not just the chassis rails because of the airbags and the crumple zone and so forth - unless its a Defender in which case it doesn't have all of that :)
Bushie
11th January 2009, 07:26 AM
- unless its a Defender in which case it doesn't have all of that :)
Which as about the most capable off road vehicle (off the shelf) has a manufacturer that doesn't attach recovery points either :twisted::twisted:
Martyn
dullbird
11th January 2009, 08:27 AM
IF they do not have good recovery points front AND back they should not be out playing! Also tie down points are NOT recovery points.
With the 110 and the hybrid I can winch both forwards and backwards. (Well need to fit that new wire to the hybrid winch first). Don't you just love a smart ****? :p
Regards
Brendan
Yes but brendan thats not for you to decide is it;)....
I have a good recovery point at the back and not so good ones on the front due to the bar I have so I suppose I should never go out again!:D
I just travel in the middle of two cars.
but there are a lot of people that dont have good on both ends...I know I would rather be recovered from what I deem to be the strongest.
And not everyone can afford a winch let alone one on either end;)
George130
11th January 2009, 08:31 AM
...or not get the car stuck on the bolards in the car parking.
:o
It was a servo and it only took a 20 point turn to get it off again:D.
Then to cap it of the tanker that helped to block me left as I got free:angel:.
Slunnie
11th January 2009, 08:58 AM
That's because the bar is attached to the crush cans and not just the chassis rails because of the airbags and the crumple zone and so forth - unless its a Defender in which case it doesn't have all of that :)
Apparently its due to people using really silly recovery techniques and then coming back at the bar manufacturers and blaming them for their own stupidity when things go wrong. The crush cans dont affect the vehicles ability to be recovered from a bullbar at all, the D2 ARB bar can be used for recovery, and even likewise the LC200 which is meant to have really soft crush cans can be recovered from the bullbar (winching etc) but the highlift/tow/snatch points have now been removed.
Hows this for interesting. Because the LC200 has such soft crush cans ARB manufactured a crush can for the bar that was soft in compression, but to prevent it from stretching when winching they ran a cable through the middle of it which was then pinned to the chassis a little further in.
leeds
11th January 2009, 09:20 AM
Yes but brendan thats not for you to decide is it;)....
I have a good recovery point at the back and not so good ones on the front due to the bar I have so I suppose I should never go out again!:D
I just travel in the middle of two cars.
but there are a lot of people that dont have good on both ends...I know I would rather be recovered from what I deem to be the strongest.
And not everyone can afford a winch let alone one on either end;)
Well Lou, if you turned up at my local club events with unsuitable recovery points then you would not be allowed to play. Inadequate recovery points are an injury causing incident about to happen.
On one occasion I had to travel over 20 miles to get in front of a vehicle to recover it as recovering it backwards was not an option.
The cost of decent recoveries points is minimal in comparison to the failure of an inadequate recovery point.
Regards
Leeds
dullbird
11th January 2009, 12:29 PM
Well Lou, if you turned up at my local club events with unsuitable recovery points then you would not be allowed to play. Inadequate recovery points are an injury causing incident about to happen.
On one occasion I had to travel over 20 miles to get in front of a vehicle to recover it as recovering it backwards was not an option.
The cost of decent recoveries points is minimal in comparison to the failure of an inadequate recovery point.
Regards
Leeds
thats nice brendan but I'm not going to be....as you live in the uk:)
Ok so I have a bar which has what a mate calls to points that you can put a shackle on too that he reckons are to thin! so he said I wouldn't recover from them,
So I purchased some recovery points for my disco you know the ones 10mm thick steel that attach on to your chassi rail.....I put them on they are not long enough they don't drop down far enough to stop a strap interfering with the base of the Bar so the only way I could really be recovered on them is if i was being snatch up a hill as to pull me on the same level could possibly force the bar upwards and into the car.....which is probably not very safe either
So what would you recommend oh wise and noble one. And lets not go for all the expensive options hey because unlike you I don't have thousands to spend on my car:)
tony
11th January 2009, 08:30 PM
So what would you recommend oh wise and noble one. And lets not go for all the expensive options hey because unlike you I don't have thousands to spend on my car:)
Lue you dont have to spend a fortune to get good recovery points, on the front
you just gotta know what your doing, and where to get the bits from without going to places like ARB...
T
Tombie
11th January 2009, 08:46 PM
Apparently its due to people using really silly recovery techniques and then coming back at the bar manufacturers and blaming them for their own stupidity when things go wrong. The crush cans dont affect the vehicles ability to be recovered from a bullbar at all, the D2 ARB bar can be used for recovery, and even likewise the LC200 which is meant to have really soft crush cans can be recovered from the bullbar (winching etc) but the highlift/tow/snatch points have now been removed.
Hows this for interesting. Because the LC200 has such soft crush cans ARB manufactured a crush can for the bar that was soft in compression, but to prevent it from stretching when winching they ran a cable through the middle of it which was then pinned to the chassis a little further in.
You cannot however, recover from a TJM bar.... The Crush cans WILL dislocate!
leeds
11th January 2009, 08:51 PM
If the recovery points are Jate Rings (http://www.famousfour.co.uk/foursport/shackle.php) or fabricated equivalents or similar then they are extremely strong and good recovery points.
Next point is the bumper/roo bar arrangement interfering with the recovery strap. The principle component of force fully in the direction of the recovery strap. If the strap is deflected by the bumper there will be a minor component of force in the vertical plane away from strap in towards the bumper. As the angle of deflection increases then the minor component of force in towards bumper increases.
Would your bumper/roo bar arrangement be capable of lifting the front end of the disco by using a hi lift jack? If yes then I can not see a problem with the bumper. If no, then should that bumper be on your vehicle?
Regards
Brendan
mcrover
11th January 2009, 09:33 PM
thats nice brendan but I'm not going to be....as you live in the uk:)
Ok so I have a bar which has what a mate calls to points that you can put a shackle on too that he reckons are to thin! so he said I wouldn't recover from them,
So I purchased some recovery points for my disco you know the ones 10mm thick steel that attach on to your chassi rail.....I put them on they are not long enough they don't drop down far enough to stop a strap interfering with the base of the Bar so the only way I could really be recovered on them is if i was being snatch up a hill as to pull me on the same level could possibly force the bar upwards and into the car.....which is probably not very safe either
So what would you recommend oh wise and noble one. And lets not go for all the expensive options hey because unlike you I don't have thousands to spend on my car:)
Ok DB, here we have a quandry, if your car is backed hard up against a hard surface such as rock which cant be dug with anything in the back of your car to get to your rear point and you will be required to pull the weight of the vehicle to recover it from it's possition, what would you do?
This has happened in Gembrook on a trip I wasnt on but freinds of mine were with a D2 with no recovery points.
They destroyed the front bumper and tiedowns trying to extract it from what it slipped slowly into due to not being able to get traction on the shinny wet rocks on AT tyres.
They ended up wrapping a tree trunk protector around the chassis rails and using that as a bridle to connect the snatchy to and pulled it out.
That D2 now has a bull bar and adaquate recovery points.
There was not a scratch on the vehicle other than what was caused by the recovery.
Sooooooooo....
Have you thought of making a bridle type set up that can be hooked on somewhere under the car, Ive seen photo's on here somewhere of a cable type one on a D1 with standard front bar.
That would be cheap and strong and wouldnt interfere with anything else.
You could also get another plate welded up against the one you have to make it a bit beefier but this also depends on design etc weather that is possible :D
If the recovery points are Jate Rings (http://www.famousfour.co.uk/foursport/shackle.php) or fabricated equivalents or similar then they are extremely strong and good recovery points.
Next point is the bumper/roo bar arrangement interfering with the recovery strap. The principle component of force fully in the direction of the recovery strap. If the strap is deflected by the bumper there will be a minor component of force in the vertical plane away from strap in towards the bumper. As the angle of deflection increases then the minor component of force in towards bumper increases.
Would your bumper/roo bar arrangement be capable of lifting the front end of the disco by using a hi lift jack? If yes then I can not see a problem with the bumper. If no, then should that bumper be on your vehicle?
Regards
Brendan
I dpont like hookjing up to Jate rings that are bolted to the bull bar, they are normally only rated for a straight pull to about 500 to 600kgs and even with 2 of them a snatch recovery will more than likely exceed that.
Hooks bolted on to the chassis or 10mm plate and reated bow shackles like what I have on mine (built into the bar mounts) are in my opinion better suited to snatch recoverys.
If were talking a normal line pull, not a snatch then near on anything would be adaquate as long as it is stronger than the tie down points.
dullbird
11th January 2009, 11:03 PM
If the recovery points are Jate Rings (http://www.famousfour.co.uk/foursport/shackle.php) or fabricated equivalents or similar then they are extremely strong and good recovery points.
Next point is the bumper/roo bar arrangement interfering with the recovery strap. The principle component of force fully in the direction of the recovery strap. If the strap is deflected by the bumper there will be a minor component of force in the vertical plane away from strap in towards the bumper. As the angle of deflection increases then the minor component of force in towards bumper increases.
Would your bumper/roo bar arrangement be capable of lifting the front end of the disco by using a hi lift jack? If yes then I can not see a problem with the bumper. If no, then should that bumper be on your vehicle?
Regards
Brendan
Possibly I'm not sure...have never tried but it is a smart bar!
its an ADR compliant bullbar brendan I see no reason why it shouldn't be on the vehicle even if a hi lift wont lift it....not eveyone is confident to use a hi lift and not everyone carrys one.
just out of interest where are you suggesting I put the jate rings?
for anyone that doesn't know what the bar looks like
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2010/04/41.jpg
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2009/01/985.jpg
dullbird
11th January 2009, 11:11 PM
Ok DB, here we have a quandry, if your car is backed hard up against a hard surface such as rock which cant be dug with anything in the back of your car to get to your rear point and you will be required to pull the weight of the vehicle to recover it from it's possition, what would you do? Well I couldn't really answer that unless I was in the situation but I bet we would find away But remember I never said I didn't have recovery points in the front I just said someone suggested not to use them as they looked thin! if push came to shove I would bridle off the two to spread the load and use them;)
This has happened in Gembrook on a trip I wasnt on but freinds of mine were with a D2 with no recovery points.
They destroyed the front bumper and tiedowns trying to extract it from what it slipped slowly into due to not being able to get traction on the shinny wet rocks on AT tyres.
They ended up wrapping a tree trunk protector around the chassis rails and using that as a bridle to connect the snatchy to and pulled it out.
That D2 now has a bull bar and adaquate recovery points.
There was not a scratch on the vehicle other than what was caused by the recovery.
Sooooooooo....
Have you thought of making a bridle type set up that can be hooked on somewhere under the car, Ive seen photo's on here somewhere of a cable type one on a D1 with standard front bar.
i think its the bar that gets in the way to be honest but I would always bridle if I had to recovery points on the front anyway or somewhere to attach as its less stress on the chassi
That would be cheap and strong and wouldnt interfere with anything else.
You could also get another plate welded up against the one you have to make it a bit beefier but this also depends on design etc weather that is possible :D
Phil did look at them and the way they were made we are not sure this is possible, I did how ever contact the guy I brought them off to let him know he said he might maje some longer ones to trial....he never got back to me
I dpont like hookjing up to Jate rings that are bolted to the bull bar, they are normally only rated for a straight pull to about 500 to 600kgs and even with 2 of them a snatch recovery will more than likely exceed that.
Hooks bolted on to the chassis or 10mm plate and reated bow shackles like what I have on mine (built into the bar mounts) are in my opinion better suited to snatch recoverys.
If were talking a normal line pull, not a snatch then near on anything would be adaquate as long as it is stronger than the tie down points.
the bars eyes would be stronger than tie downs for sure I reckon.
mcrover
11th January 2009, 11:59 PM
DB, those 2 straight bars with the holes in them which are well below the bottom of the bar, are they the recovery points your taling about, iff so, they are plenty long enough and depending on how think they are, from the second photo and not knowing any more than that I would think they would be plenty good enough as long as you didnt do too much (or to violent) sideways recovery.
I dont think that it would come close to hitting the bar with a 3m sling as a bridle :D
leeds
12th January 2009, 05:29 AM
I have no idea what a smart bar or an ADR compliant bullbar is.
Having a look at the photo I would be surprised if your bumper would cause much proplem for front recovery.
The recovery point and front bumper on our Disco is like this
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2009/01/982.jpg
The front recovery points are bolted to chassis and welded to the bumper like this
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2009/02/437.jpg
Use two shackles with the bridle passed through loop in rope/strap spreads the load and reduces chance of a shackle flying.
I think there is confusion/misunderstanding over the term Jate ring. Jate rings are fasten to chassis legs where lash down eyes go. They are not mounted on bumpers and the strength is far in excess of 5-600 kg
In the photo below on the left is a lash down eye on the right is a JATE ring
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2009/01/983.jpg
The strength of the Jate ring depends on twice the shear strength of the 10 mm bolt. Assuming strength is on screwed section then strength is
Grade 8.8 7.5 tonnes
Grade 10.9 10.5 tonnes
Grade 12.9 12.5 tonnes
This is per Jate ring!
One problem with Jate rings is that unless you prep a bridle first then it can be a bit messy attaching the recovery gear when you are stuck in mud. One advantage for bumper recovery points!
Regards
Brendan
dullbird
12th January 2009, 11:52 AM
DB, those 2 straight bars with the holes in them which are well below the bottom of the bar, are they the recovery points your taling about, iff so, they are plenty long enough and depending on how think they are, from the second photo and not knowing any more than that I would think they would be plenty good enough as long as you didnt do too much (or to violent) sideways recovery.
I dont think that it would come close to hitting the bar with a 3m sling as a bridle :D
no problem with the length of these it was the strength! the problem with the length is the recovery points in which I brought to use instead of these, they are what don't hang down far enough.
bendan I can't weld my'n the bullbar in plastic with a metal internal sketelon. so the recovery loops I have are all part of that metal skelton.......do you hsave pictures of where you are talking about the jate rings attaching to the chassi as I don't understand where you are talking about....not that it really matters as I would imagine tehy would havng down as far as the recovery points I already and no doubt again would caus the strap to interfer with the bar...the base of my bar does hang down quite low. I'am looking to chage the bar as soon as my money allows which will be a while as its not got a great approach angle
Slunnie
12th January 2009, 12:13 PM
The front recovery points are bolted to chassis and welded to the bumper like this
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2009/02/437.jpg
Regards
Brendan
Now that is a good point because it shares the load through the bolts evenly.
Sprint
12th January 2009, 12:17 PM
where the which vehicle travels in the group is allways under the influence of Mr Murphy...... when things go pear shaped, it's a good bet the winch vehicle will either be unable to help or have to turn around!
weeds
12th January 2009, 12:26 PM
where the which vehicle travels in the group is allways under the influence of Mr Murphy...... when things go pear shaped, it's a good bet the winch vehicle will either be unable to help or have to turn around!
yep murphys law............
leeds
13th January 2009, 10:52 AM
Hi Lou,
I persnally do not have any photos of Jate rings on a Discovery. Did a google search and found this SITE (http://www.landroverstuff.com/jaterings.htm) which shows Jate rings on a discovery 2
Regards
Brendan
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.