PDA

View Full Version : Swapping transmission ECU's



PaulP38a
17th May 2009, 12:15 AM
A member of this forum has kindly loaned me a Transmission ECU from a 01/02 4.6L to try on my 99 4.0L.

Put the 4.6L EAT ECU in this afternoon, and while it has not stopped the clunking and jerking in the transmission, it does feel a bit perkier than before.

No errors on the message display, but am wondering how the 4.6L Transmission ECU is programmed differently to the 4.0 version. I read in RAVE that a changed EAT ECU should be recalibrated for the engine being used. Anyone know how important this is? I kind of like the perkiness in the transmission now.

What are your thoughts on changing over the transmission and transfer case over to those from a 01/02 4.6L please?

Cheers, Paul.

PaulP38a
17th May 2009, 10:11 PM
Not sure if it was swapping over the EAT ECU or if the transmission is getting worse, but it was getting some violent gear changes this afternoon. One a couple of occassions, I heard the rear wheels "chirp" while accelerating.

Put the original EAT ECU back in tonight. Will see how it goes tomorrow. Maybe tomorrow night I'll change over the Selector Position Switch to see what difference it makes.

I've almost resigned myself to this being an internal problem in the transmission but figure I'll try to change over the "easy" things first.

So, any thoughts on why I should or shouldn't swap over from a ZF4HP22 tansmission to a ZF4HP24 transmission?

andrew e
18th May 2009, 11:06 PM
So, any thoughts on why I should or shouldn't swap over from a ZF4HP22 tansmission to a ZF4HP24 transmission?

You should, because i dont have an ZF4HP22.:D

Hoges
19th May 2009, 03:50 PM
"...I heard the rear wheels "chirp" while accelerating" ...

I'm impressed! :twisted:

Is this accelerating under full throttle or accelerating as if a blue striped Commodore/Falcon was following you as the lights turned "green" ? ;):D

Many engine/AT ECU communication setups are designed to momentarily retard the ignition timing at the instant of changing gears in order to reduce power sufficiently to ensure a smoother change. You seem to be getting full power delivery, hence the "chirp"...

If you slightly ease off the loud peddle to prompt a gear change, then continue accelerating? does it "clunk" as badly?

Do you have a faultmate you can use to check on AT specs?

cheers
hoges

PaulP38a
19th May 2009, 04:08 PM
"...I heard the rear wheels "chirp" while accelerating" ...

I'm impressed! :twisted:

Is this accelerating under full throttle or accelerating as if a blue striped Commodore/Falcon was following you as the lights turned "green" ? ;):D
Somehwere in between. I was giving it a fair bit of boot at the time, but not foot-to-the-floor.



Many engine/AT ECU communication setups are designed to momentarily retard the ignition timing at the instant of changing gears in order to reduce power sufficiently to ensure a smoother change. You seem to be getting full power delivery, hence the "chirp"...

If you slightly ease off the loud peddle to prompt a gear change, then continue accelerating? does it "clunk" as badly?

It's all over the place at the moment. Sometimes I can feel it backing off, wanting to change, and then sometimes it does or doesn't change. Much worse when it is from a cold start. Not as bad when it warms up.

Had it happen again today while warm - the "chirp" and violent change - it didn't back off for that change of gear.



Do you have a faultmate you can use to check on AT specs?

Not yet unfortunately, but one is on my wish list. Mechanic had his Testbook on it a couple of weeks ago and it was reporting no faults. He thinks it is a mechanical problem but we both know it is going to be an expensive exercise to drop the AT out to check it properly. If I'm going to drop the AT out of the car, might as well use the opportunity to put a stronger box in (i.e. HP24).

Cheers
Paul.

2door grover
23rd May 2009, 06:09 PM
This might sound dumb but does it have the right amount of oil in it? You haven't said if you have check that. These boxes are different to check then most autos. You have to check the oil level when its cold not hot as you do with most autos. I had a trimatic with a shift kit on a few other bits done to it and unless it had the right amount of oil in it the thing wouldn't change gears when it should.

You changed the computer for the box and its pretty much still the same so my bet its the oil that actually does all the work not the computer that is telling it what to do.

Also if you pull the dipstick and smell a sort of "dirty or burnt" your oil is stuff and needs to be changed!! It should be a nice red. When i got mine the auto box oil was stuffed! It was brown colour and had been serviced by a so called "good" rover workshop in sydney.

This has just reminded me its due for another oil, filter change and diff oils aswell. has any one used the filter kit thats been selling on ebay the last few months?

PaulP38a
24th May 2009, 12:34 AM
This might sound dumb but does it have the right amount of oil in it? You haven't said if you have check that. These boxes are different to check then most autos. You have to check the oil level when its cold not hot as you do with most autos. I had a trimatic with a shift kit on a few other bits done to it and unless it had the right amount of oil in it the thing wouldn't change gears when it should.

Fair comment. I had it serviced at CMW a few weeks ago and they did change the filter and the oil. Didn't make much difference to driving at the time. I assume they put the right amount of fluid in but will check again myself.

In the 99 model, there is no dipstick for the AT. You've got to get under the car and unscrew the filler plug.

2door grover
24th May 2009, 04:33 PM
I'd be getting under your car and checking, wouldn't be hard on yours :)

most auto shops will check the box when warm because "thats how you do it for holden and ford so every other car must be the same" as i was told when 1st asking question about my car.

PaulP38a
24th May 2009, 07:04 PM
I'd be getting under your car and checking, wouldn't be hard on yours :)

Took your advice and checked it. Far from being underfilled - it spewed a fair bit of fluid out of the filler hole. Colour was bright red and clean, with the odd metallic sparkle (guessing that's from bits of gears breaking off inside). Got my son to work through the gears while I collected fluid in a tray underneath.
Approx 600ml came out before it slowed to a trickle.
Took it for a run up the road and not much difference... still hunting between changes, but it did go up the 3rd and then 4th without as much complaining as yesterday. Will take it to work tomorrow and see how it goes.

Hoges
25th May 2009, 06:34 PM
Yep, according to the RAVE the AT should be checked when cold and it's critical that it NOT be overfilled. Best thing is to wait till it's cold then open the drain plug until it stops dripping - level with the bottom of the filler hole on a level floor ar standard height is the recommended practice apparently.

cheers

RRv8
29th May 2009, 03:07 AM
regarding checking tranny oil level

my workshop manual must be wrong then as it says the level is checked with the engine running and after going thru the gears a few times

I forgot this the first time i did mine lucky I remembered checked the manual and corrected before driving anywhere
I ended up adding 2000ml more oil

I would think that being low on oil by 2 litres could be just as harmful as having too much