View Full Version : Disco 4 review 5/5
martinozcmax
9th August 2009, 04:47 AM
Land Rover Discovery 4 review - Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/carreviews/5978302/Land-Rover-Discovery-4-review.html)
loanrangie
9th August 2009, 08:25 AM
Land Rover Discovery 4 review - Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/carreviews/5978302/Land-Rover-Discovery-4-review.html)
Another step closer to D3 affordability :), bout time they upped the TDV6 to 3ltr.
PAT303
9th August 2009, 01:54 PM
Another step closer to D3 affordability :), bout time they upped the TDV6 to 3ltr.
Yep all they need to do now is drop the ''old'' 2.7 with auto into the defender. Pat
V8Ian
9th August 2009, 01:56 PM
It's still ugly.:(
Disco_owner
9th August 2009, 02:14 PM
Looking at the article the discovery 4 has a twin-Turbo Charger setup ,now would this be 2 identical turbo chargers running in parallel , or are they referring to a sequential turbo charging like one developed by BMW?
big guy
9th August 2009, 02:44 PM
Disco Owner
The article says one turbo cuts in early and one later, does that answer your question?
More power, more torque, more economy. Can't beat that really.
Land Rover Aust could give all Disco one owners a special deal and take us into the next generation of transportation, now that would be agreat deal.
Any takers here?
Chucaro
9th August 2009, 03:09 PM
Any takers here?
Nope, give me the Isuzu 3.9 ot the Tdi 300 any time for Ozi remote trips :D
big guy
9th August 2009, 03:14 PM
I do agree with you, well almost, not a suzi man but technology is a way we are going and yes that will make outback travel more difficult/dangerous but the time will come when we be forced to take our old faithful off the road for a new enviro friendly car.
I give them 5-10 years. Thoughts?
Chucaro
9th August 2009, 03:20 PM
I do agree with you, well almost, not a suzi man but technology is a way we are going and yes that will make outback travel more difficult/dangerous but the time will come when we be forced to take our old faithful off the road for a new enviro friendly car.
I give them 5-10 years. Thoughts?
It will be when the price and maintenance will be afforable for a pensioner :D
I am on the waithing list for a 2008 diesel RR at $ 10000 :p
Disco_owner
9th August 2009, 03:43 PM
Disco Owner
The article says one turbo cuts in early and one later, does that answer your question?
More power, more torque, more economy. Can't beat that really.
Land Rover Aust could give all Disco one owners a special deal and take us into the next generation of transportation, now that would be agreat deal.
Any takers here?
aha... so it is Sequential Twin Turbocharging.
I agree , Technology is the way to go , better performance , better Fuel economy , less particulates , more power Torque etc. I would buy a Defender with a TDV6 engine , if they released one with better ergonomics. :wasntme:
ducks for cover....
stevo68
9th August 2009, 04:40 PM
It's still ugly.:(Actually that would be incorrect........just because you think its ugly....doesn't in fact mean it's ugly. I fail to see the relevance of that comment in relation to the post. You would also be incorrect in that the majority of people....including myself...think it is a fantastic looking vehicle...aside from all the other aspects to the D3/D4.
I could think of many, many things that could be considered "ugly".... an LR...let alone a Disco 3/4 is not. It's a bit like hearing that an Aussie has won gold at the Olympics and someone goes....yeah but he's ugly....instead of lauding praise or saying something positive. Sorry but posts like that in an LR forum just **** me off as it does many other D3 and soon to be D4 owners,
Regards
Stevo
Chucaro
9th August 2009, 04:47 PM
Stevo....do you have a bad day :eek::confused:
Take it easy mate :D
Ricey
9th August 2009, 05:02 PM
Talking to a D1 owner the other day, he said he didn't like the D3 as it was too 'Boxy' all the while standing in front of his D1 which, well, is as boxy as a D3 imo. I love the look of the D4!
V8Ian
9th August 2009, 05:23 PM
Actually that would be incorrect........just because you think its ugly....doesn't in fact mean it's ugly. I fail to see the relevance of that comment in relation to the post. You would also be incorrect in that the majority of people....including myself...think it is a fantastic looking vehicle...aside from all the other aspects to the D3/D4.
I could think of many, many things that could be considered "ugly".... an LR...let alone a Disco 3/4 is not. It's a bit like hearing that an Aussie has won gold at the Olympics and someone goes....yeah but he's ugly....instead of lauding praise or saying something positive. Sorry but posts like that in an LR forum just **** me off as it does many other D3 and soon to be D4 owners,
Regards
Stevo
Well sorry Stevo, that's my opinion, I'm entitled to it and I stand by it. If your opinion differs I respect your right to like it, and as such I won't get **** off by it.
George130
9th August 2009, 05:49 PM
Looks fine. They could have kept the roof buldge bigger. It's a signature look for the Disco's.
PAT303
9th August 2009, 06:20 PM
It's still ugly.:(
Yeh they should follow tojo and make it look like the 200-klugga and Rav,man they make my heart jump. Pat
V8Ian
9th August 2009, 06:28 PM
Yeh they should follow tojo and make it look like the 200-klugga and Rav,man they make my heart jump. Pat
I personally prefer the more conservative style like a D1 or 2, but I respect your preference.
Disco_owner
9th August 2009, 06:33 PM
I personally prefer the more conservative style like a D1 or 2, but I respect your preference.
:Rolling:I Think pat was having a dig at the Toyomota Lambbruiser 200 or the Klugger's styling.
loanrangie
9th August 2009, 10:09 PM
I personally prefer the more conservative style like a D1 or 2, but I respect your preference.
Unless hes being sarcastic, i dont respect his right to like toyota 4wd's- now there's a stable of fugly vehicles.:wasntme:
willem
10th August 2009, 05:48 AM
Now, now children, behave yourselves!
Just remember what they say in the classics - beauty is in the eye of of the beholder!
Willem
martinozcmax
10th August 2009, 08:41 AM
Using the same logic,just because you think it is not ugly,doesn't mean it isn't.It is just an opinion,Everyone has one and no one is right or wrong,only to themselves.:)
Opinions are like arses everyone has one but nobody wants to see anyone else's. :D :D :wasntme:
martinozcmax
10th August 2009, 08:47 AM
I personally won't buy a D3 or D4. I like my old 93 Tdi 200 because I can service it myself and buy any parts I need from ebay UK cheaply. I use a mechanic I trust for anything too hard for me and he doesn't rip me off with silly hourly rates or work charged for and not done.
I hate getting ripped off by the dealers and the outrageous servicing costs. I also think the old mechanical less electronics vehicles are less likely to leave you stranded. The only three amigo's in my life are on celluloid. :)
But as several people have stated it's each to their own. We all have more in common than differences, after all we are all on the aulro site through choice.
Regards
Martin
stevo68
10th August 2009, 08:49 AM
Well sorry Stevo, that's my opinion, I'm entitled to it and I stand by it. If your opinion differs I respect your right to like it, and as such I won't get **** off by it.
Using the same logic,just because you think it is not ugly,doesn't mean it isn't.It is just an opinion,Everyone has one and no one is right or wrong,only to themselves.No need to be sorry.....we all know the saying about opinions. My point was that someone posted something good about LR...in this case a D4 and that was the best you can come up with....."its still ugly". Point being?? So hooray for having an opinion.....its relevance to the topic is nil. Yes...why don't we all knock our marque when something good is said about it? For sure be critical if warranted...but knock it for knockings sake?
As to logic....well opinions are easily torn to shreds...factual information is a lot harder to refute. In terms of the statement "being ugly"....that is an opinion. Being the top rated 4WD around the world, winning countless awards and people spending upwards of $60k-$100k + would confirm that the opinion of it being a great looking car along with other aspects...would be correct.
So yes we all have opinions yada yada........ what I fail to see is the point of innocuous statements such as that...in a positive article about an LR...one may as well go buy a Toyota or Nissan as they seem to revel in putting things down,
Regards
Stevo
dullbird
10th August 2009, 09:08 AM
No need to be sorry.....we all know the saying about opinions.
My point was that someone posted something good about LR...in this case a D4 and that was the best you can come up with....."its still ugly". Point being?? So hooray for having an opinion.....its relevance to the topic is nil. Yes...why don't we all knock our marque when something good is said about it? For sure be critical if warranted...but knock it for knockings sake?
As to logic....well opinions are easily torn to shreds...factual information is a lot harder to refute. In terms of the statement "being ugly"....that is an opinion. Being the top rated 4WD around the world, winning countless awards and people spending upwards of $60k-$100k + would confirm that the opinion of it being a great looking car along with other aspects...would be correct.
So yes we all have opinions yada yada........ what I fail to see is the point of innocuous statements such as that...in a positive article about an LR...one may as well go buy a Toyota or Nissan as they seem to revel in putting things down,
Regards
Stevo
he is still allowed an opinion stevo....and it is relevant to the thread as it is about the car.
the poster only put up a review of someone elses opinions.
If someone posted up a review that slated the marque does that mean that everyone that posts in that thread can only say bad things as saying good things wouldn't be relevant?:D
IanV8 if you think that cars ugly.........good for you.:p I dont I like it and knowing what the D3/4's can do makes it even nicer.....
We are ALL guilty for pointless posts probably even you stevo thats part and parcel of writing something on here. Not everyone is going to like what you say:)
JohnF
10th August 2009, 09:27 AM
It will be when the price and maintenance will be afforable for a pensioner :D
I am on the waithing list for a 2008 diesel RR at $ 10000 :p
Knowing the second hand pricing of an old RR you might not have to wait that long for it to be affordable
stevo68
10th August 2009, 09:35 AM
he is still allowed an opinion stevo....and it is relevant to the thread as it is about the car.
the poster only put up a review of someone elses opinions.
If someone posted up a review that slated the marque does that mean that everyone that posts in that thread can only say bad things as saying good things wouldn't be relevant?:D
IanV8 if you think that cars ugly.........good for you.:p I dont I like it and knowing what the D3/4's can do makes it even nicer.....
We are ALL guilty for pointless posts probably even you stevo thats part and parcel of writing something on here. Not everyone is going to like what you say:)Ahhh DB....you've probably being waiting months to counteract something I have said..seeing that I have been so quiet :p. Now quite clearly...I haven't said anyone isn't allowed an opinion.
The risk one takes though by expressing that opinion...as I have....is that you may cop some flak over it. That said...some opinions deserve more flak than others......I think that deserves flak. Whether the "piece" was positive or negative...is irrelevant....I think to put down one of our "own" is not much chop....and quite thoughtless as we have many D3 and soon to be D4 owners who will join this forum.
Plus if one is going to make a statement...at least back it up...its ugly because???
And really...if that's ugly...them I'm a monkeys uncle.......
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2009/08/1326.jpg
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2011/05/972.jpg
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2009/08/1327.jpg
Regards
Stevo
dullbird
10th August 2009, 09:57 AM
Ahhh DB....you've probably being waiting months to counteract something I have said..seeing that I have been so quiet :p. Now quite clearly...I haven't said anyone isn't allowed an opinion.
The risk one takes though by expressing that opinion...as I have....is that you may cop some flak over it. That said...some opinions deserve more flak than others......I think that deserves flak. Whether the "piece" was positive or negative...is irrelevant....I think to put down one of our "own" is not much chop....and quite thoughtless as we have many D3 and soon to be D4 owners who will join this forum.
Plus if one is going to make a statement...at least back it up...its ugly because???
And really...if that's ugly...them I'm a monkeys uncle.......
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2009/08/1326.jpg
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2011/05/972.jpg
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2009/08/1327.jpg
Regards
Stevo
:lol2: you wish:D.......you haven't been that quiet stevo I have enjoyed reading your posts up until this one. Wow your a very sensitive guy stevo to think that when ever i reply to your post I have been sitting and waiting to do so......your not that important mate;).
In fact you may notice that I often have a say when I feel anyone is having a go at someone on here when its not necessary
I replied as I feel you have been very harsh.....if you feel he needs to back up his statement couldn't you have just asked why he feels the way he does? rather than going off on one like that and try to make him look small in front of the whole forum.:)
Outlaw
10th August 2009, 09:58 AM
And what is this thread actually about again????? OH YES a review on a D4 not on a questionably looking boxy D3 :p
dullbird
10th August 2009, 10:03 AM
And what is this thread actually about again?????
OH YES a review on a D4 not on a questionably looking boxy D3 :p
says the man that drives a house brick:D
V8Ian
10th August 2009, 10:12 AM
No need to be sorry.....we all know the saying about opinions. My point was that someone posted something good about LR...in this case a D4 and that was the best you can come up with....."its still ugly". Point being?? So hooray for having an opinion.....its relevance to the topic is nil. Yes...why don't we all knock our marque when something good is said about it? For sure be critical if warranted...but knock it for knockings sake?
As to logic....well opinions are easily torn to shreds...factual information is a lot harder to refute. In terms of the statement "being ugly"....that is an opinion. Being the top rated 4WD around the world, winning countless awards and people spending upwards of $60k-$100k + would confirm that the opinion of it being a great looking car along with other aspects...would be correct.
So yes we all have opinions yada yada........ what I fail to see is the point of innocuous statements such as that...in a positive article about an LR...one may as well go buy a Toyota or Nissan as they seem to revel in putting things down,
Regards
Stevo
You must have been a Chinese editor in a previous life, where only the positive spin may be published, true or not. You're in Australia now, where we have freedom of speach, thought and opinion. My free opinion still considers the D3 ugly! If you want one, good for you, I hope you get many years of happiness from it. If you do ever aquire possession of one, rest assured I will not be launching bombastic attacks upon you for your (right of) choice. As a democratic Australian, I will respect everyone's choice and right to hold a differing opinion.
I may not agree with your views, but will fight for your right to hold and express them.
olbod
10th August 2009, 10:38 AM
I could live with the new D4, especially now Cooper are producing an AT
tyre to fit the bigger wheel diamaters.
I must admit tho that it would be a base model with less electrical gadgets.
I am not completly sold on the shape of the D3-4 but I think this new one would be good vaue for money and they have also increased its off road capability.
TJM make a very nice bullbar for them also.
gone bush
10th August 2009, 11:07 AM
I THINK IT LOOKS AWESOME AND I WANT ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks martin for posting the review.
cheers JP
PAT303
10th August 2009, 11:27 AM
I personally prefer the more conservative style like a D1 or 2, but I respect your preference.
I agree with you,I like the D1 over all the others too but I also like the way LR have not copied the japanese in making all thier vehicles look the same with the rounded body work and stupid looking lights and oversize plastic bumpers. Pat
WhiteD3
10th August 2009, 11:33 AM
I could live with the new D4, especially now Cooper are producing an AT tyre to fit the bigger wheel diamaters..
Yes but one small problem remains re 18" tyres. The spare wheel well will only take a 265 (255 being the standard tyre). If you want to go bigger, to say a 275 ATR, the spare either won't fit or has to be deflated first.
x-box
10th August 2009, 11:37 AM
I also drive a house brick and love it!!!! The D4 just looks like a more fancy brick, but by golly i would love one.
Electronics or not, they are getting better and more reliable - and my view of D3's offroad has been amended (we have a few in our club and they go places!)
So ugly or not is irrelevant (for me) - different strokes etc etc...... I love them and would have one in a flash
WhiteD3
10th August 2009, 11:45 AM
Personally I love the look of the D3/4. One big plus is it doesn't look like anything else on the road.
My only complaint re the D4 is the colour-coded bumpers. I, like everyone else who's been off road in the D3, have scrapped the rear bumper while exiting washouts, creeks, etc. In the D3 they're mat black so the odd scrape makes little difference. Doing the same thing to a colour-coded bumper add a degree of stress (and $$) which I don't need.
I think the "sand start" mode and launch changes to the HDC will be very good.
stevo68
10th August 2009, 11:48 AM
:lol2: you wish:D.......you haven't been that quiet stevo I have enjoyed reading your posts up until this one. Wow your a very sensitive guy stevo to think that when ever i reply to your post I have been sitting and waiting to do so......your not that important mate;).
In fact you may notice that I often have a say when I feel anyone is having a go at someone on here when its not necessary
I replied as I feel you have been very harsh.....if you feel he needs to back up his statement couldn't you have just asked why he feels the way he does? rather than going off on one like that and try to make him look small in front of the whole forum.:)Actually I have been quiet in regards to getting involved in any sort of discussion....got old getting flagged in the mods area. Sensitive.....highly unlikely....SWMBO would love it if I was more sensitive instead of being like a bull at a gate :). As for harsh....I think putting down an LR on a LR forum is harsh.
You must have been a Chinese editor in a previous life, where only the positive spin may be published, true or not. You're in Australia now, where we have freedom of speach, thought and opinion. My free opinion still considers the D3 ugly! If you want one, good for you, I hope you get many years of happiness from it. If you do ever aquire possession of one, rest assured I will not be launching bombastic attacks upon you for your (right of) choice. As a democratic Australian, I will respect everyone's choice and right to hold a differing opinion.
I may not agree with your views, but will fight for your right to hold and express them. Chinese?? I'm in Australia now?? Bombastic?? You and a few others seem to miss the point. I couldn't care less about your opinion....so you think its ugly......care factor 0. It was the point of making the comment in the first place.....why? What value did it hold? Someone puts up a positive report on the D4...so what...we malign it instead? Thats what we do?
I think the "opinion" component has been covered. What I want to know is if someone posts up a positive report on an LR...any LR....then that it is ok to knock it one form or another...opinion or not. When negative reports are posted....folks are up in arms...when someone on our own forum does it....must be ok. If the general consensus is that it is ok...guess I will happily stay in the minority.
As for respecting everyones choice and opinions...personally I do not. Think about some peoples opinions and choices...can one really respect them?? Oh and no not Chinese.........have been in Australia all my life....bombastic....will give that one to SWMBO..she's always looking for new things to call me....and yes have already owned a D3...thought the pics were a dead giveaway...best damn vehicle I have ever owned.
Regards
Stevo
djhampson
10th August 2009, 11:55 AM
Dropped into Austral LR on Sunday to test drive a D3 SE TDV6.
Apparently the prices for the D4 will be confirmed soon but... the V6 SE has been dropped and the SE will only be available in the 3.0 TDV6 at approx $91k
The 2.7TDV6 S will be around $70-80k mark.
That means the Discovery has gotten 10 - 15k more expensive. :(
Chucaro
10th August 2009, 11:59 AM
Dropped into Austral LR on Sunday to test drive a D3 SE TDV6.
Apparently the prices for the D4 will be confirmed soon but... the V6 SE has been dropped and the SE will only be available in the 3.0 TDV6 at approx $91k
The 2.7TDV6 S will be around $70-80k mark.
That means the Discovery has gotten 10 - 15k more expensive. :(
Oh well it will be a 2025 project then :D
dullbird
10th August 2009, 12:00 PM
Actually I have been quiet in regards to getting involved in any sort of discussion....
got old getting flagged in the mods area. Sensitive.....highly unlikely....SWMBO would love it if I was more sensitive instead of being like a bull at a gate :). As for harsh....I think putting down an LR on a LR forum is harsh.
Chinese?? I'm in Australia now?? Bombastic?? You and a few others seem to miss the point. I couldn't care less about your opinion....so you think its ugly......care factor 0. It was the point of making the comment in the first place.....why? What value did it hold? Someone puts up a positive report on the D4...so what...we malign it instead? Thats what we do?
I think the "opinion" component has been covered. What I want to know is if someone posts up a positive report on an LR...any LR....then that it is ok to knock it one form or another...opinion or not. When negative reports are posted....folks are up in arms...when someone on our own forum does it....must be ok. If the general consensus is that it is ok...guess I will happily stay in the minority.
As for respecting everyones choice and opinions...personally I do not. Think about some peoples opinions and choices...can one really respect them?? Oh and no not Chinese.........have been in Australia all my life....bombastic....will give that one to SWMBO..she's always looking for new things to call me....and yes have already owned a D3...thought the pics were a dead giveaway...best damn vehicle I have ever owned.
Regards
Stevo
what made you think you were getting flagged in the mods area?
only people that go out of there way to upset others or constantly don't abide by the rules get flagged in the mods area.
Chucaro
10th August 2009, 12:15 PM
Bugger.......I just wonder if it is something on the water :( :confused:
I never get agro for something like that, perhaps we can have "The bitters corner" in the forum isntead of the sims bin :angel:
stevo68
10th August 2009, 12:24 PM
Bugger.......I just wonder if it is something on the water :( :confused:
I never get agro for something like that, perhaps we can have "The bitters corner" in the forum isntead of the sims bin :angel: Don't confuse putting across a perspective as being aggro or bitter. Your making an assumption, whereas in fact I am happily munching on cheese and toast. Now if I were to mention unions, the down trodden or governments, there would be a whole dialogue from yourself forthwith :p....horses for courses when it comes to subject matter,
Regards
Stevo
WhiteD3
10th August 2009, 12:31 PM
Dropped into Austral LR on Sunday to test drive a D3 SE TDV6.
Apparently the prices for the D4 will be confirmed soon but... the V6 SE has been dropped and the SE will only be available in the 3.0 TDV6 at approx $91k
The 2.7TDV6 S will be around $70-80k mark.
That means the Discovery has gotten 10 - 15k more expensive. :(
I expected as much. That rules our a D4 for me, unless its an S with the TR option.
martinozcmax
10th August 2009, 12:56 PM
Never in my wildest dreams did I imagine posting a review of a new LR could be so divisive.
I'll have to watch what I post next time.
Live and let live guys and gals. We don't all have to love the same shapes and styles to be Land Rover afficionados :eek:
Martin
olbod
10th August 2009, 01:06 PM
Yes but one small problem remains re 18" tyres. The spare wheel well will only take a 265 (255 being the standard tyre). If you want to go bigger, to say a 275 ATR, the spare either won't fit or has to be deflated first.
I think we will find the wheel sizes will be around 20" or more, maybe 19
on the base model.
With the capability of the new D4 offroad, I dont think oversize tyres would be warranted.
With the new AT tyres now in these sizes, it will be even better offroad
because of the extra strength these tyres will provide.
The new AT tyres are also made to fit the late model RR and Sport.
Would have to be much better than running road tyres on the outback roads.
Travelling from Maree to the Alice I know what I would rather be wearing.
Cheers.
Chucaro
10th August 2009, 01:19 PM
Never in my wildest dreams did I imagine posting a review of a new LR could be so divisive.
I'll have to watch what I post next time.
Live and let live guys and gals. We don't all have to love the same shapes and styles to be Land Rover afficionados :eek:
Martin
It is good Martin specially for the members down south, it keeps the "fire" going :D
PAT303
10th August 2009, 03:45 PM
For the record the disco has the ''boxy'' shape for a reason,room.It has won alot of awards because you can seat adults into it comfortably with lots of leg,head and shoulder room were as the cruiser,even though it is bigger struggles to fit adults in the middle seats if the front are back and the third row are for people with no legs and are as comfy as a milk crate with a towl on it.In the end everything is a compromise and LR have done the best job out of all the makers,hence the most awards. Pat
willem
10th August 2009, 05:00 PM
As I have said before, I reckon the Disco 3/4 shape is all class. A really distinctive, attractive shape shape that will be recognised by posterity as being a work of art - just as the Rangie Classic was.
But it is also a very efficient shape, as someone else has pointed out. It is a car the designers sat down and asked all the right questions and got some first rate answers.
I am just waiting till the time comes when I can afford one. It is one of those cars that just clicked the first time I saw it. It all adds up, every box is ticked, etc.
Willem
Panda
10th August 2009, 08:50 PM
May well be ... but I know someone who's looking at buying a new four wheel drive, & has specifically said he won't buy the D4 because it is "ugly" to look at & too boxy. So his opinion is relevant to an extent, to an extent that the shape of the vehicle puts some people off buying it.
No need to be sorry.....we all know the saying about opinions. My point was that someone posted something good about LR...in this case a D4 and that was the best you can come up with....."its still ugly". Point being?? So hooray for having an opinion.....its relevance to the topic is nil. Yes...why don't we all knock our marque when something good is said about it? For sure be critical if warranted...but knock it for knockings sake?
As to logic....well opinions are easily torn to shreds...factual information is a lot harder to refute. In terms of the statement "being ugly"....that is an opinion. Being the top rated 4WD around the world, winning countless awards and people spending upwards of $60k-$100k + would confirm that the opinion of it being a great looking car along with other aspects...would be correct.
So yes we all have opinions yada yada........ what I fail to see is the point of innocuous statements such as that...in a positive article about an LR...one may as well go buy a Toyota or Nissan as they seem to revel in putting things down,
Regards
Stevo
Panda
10th August 2009, 08:52 PM
Don't worry Martin ... the cricket'll be back on in a couple of weeks :Rolling:
Never in my wildest dreams did I imagine posting a review of a new LR could be so divisive.
I'll have to watch what I post next time.
Live and let live guys and gals. We don't all have to love the same shapes and styles to be Land Rover afficionados :eek:
Martin
Panda
10th August 2009, 08:57 PM
I'm not particularly enamoured with the rear myself ...
It's still ugly.:(
PAT303
10th August 2009, 10:16 PM
May well be ... but I know someone who's looking at buying a new four wheel drive, & has specifically said he won't buy the D4 because it is "ugly" to look at & too boxy. So his opinion is relevant to an extent, to an extent that the shape of the vehicle puts some people off buying it.
Thats the trouble,the people who buy a vehicle don't sit in the back.Give me a boxy shape anyday if it means I haven't got my knees at my chin and someone else's elbo's in my ribs.The Discovery deserves every award it has. Pat
dullbird
10th August 2009, 10:27 PM
the Disco is a box, that off roads well straight out of the box and comes from a country that has as much space as a box.
its in its heritage:D
Panda
11th August 2009, 07:55 AM
I don't doubt it. My point is some people have a certain perspective, & it doesn't matter what you say, what they read, etc, they won't change it come hell or high water. :)
Thats the trouble,the people who buy a vehicle don't sit in the back.Give me a boxy shape anyday if it means I haven't got my knees at my chin and someone else's elbo's in my ribs.The Discovery deserves every award it has. Pat
martinozcmax
11th August 2009, 08:32 AM
As Panda has noted, coming soon. roll on the cricket !! :angel:
V8Ian
11th August 2009, 08:35 AM
Chinese?? I'm in Australia now?? Bombastic?? You and a few others seem to miss the point. I couldn't care less about your opinion....so you think its ugly......care factor 0. It was the point of making the comment in the first place.....why? What value did it hold? Someone puts up a positive report on the D4...so what...we malign it instead? Thats what we do?
I think the "opinion" component has been covered. What I want to know is if someone posts up a positive report on an LR...any LR....then that it is ok to knock it one form or another...opinion or not. When negative reports are posted....folks are up in arms...when someone on our own forum does it....must be ok. If the general consensus is that it is ok...guess I will happily stay in the minority.
As for respecting everyones choice and opinions...personally I do not. Think about some peoples opinions and choices...can one really respect them?? Oh and no not Chinese.........have been in Australia all my life....bombastic....will give that one to SWMBO..she's always looking for new things to call me....and yes have already owned a D3...thought the pics were a dead giveaway...best damn vehicle I have ever owned.
Regards
Stevo
Your post graphically displays your depth of arrogance, Stevo.
You may not respect other's or my opinions, nor care less for them; obviously you are concerned that I hold massive sway amongst intelligent folk though. I can visualize the headlines of financial broadsheets across the globe.....
MASSES AVOID LAND ROVER
IAN SAYS D3 & 4 UGLY
Share Prices Plummet
How many prospective customers do you think my humble opinion will turn away. My opinion is not a negative comment, it is a purely, 100% subjective observation. Some may not subscribe to my appreciation, that's fine too. The smart thinkers will merely say, "I don't accede to your view, I'm going to buy one." instead of running off at the mouth.
Take a good look at yourself Stevo, you have executed a brilliant swallow dive from a high bridge, only to discover a train line below instead of a river.
Best wishes,
Ian.
Tote
11th August 2009, 08:47 AM
I expected as much. That rules our a D4 for me, unless its an S with the TR option.
Never would imply that sales people would be less than truthful about the new pricing on an upcoming model but have a look at the current situation.
They want to sell vehicles NOW.... best to make a customer think the D4 is dearer, will have different specs etc
The $AUD is going Ok against the pound so no surprises there
The Landcruiser is the only real competition for the D4, TATA want to incresase market share, making the D4 $10K dearer would push customers to the Cruiser.
I reckon they'll fiddle with the spec to get a small increase in price with maybe a few less accessories/trim combinations to keep the price competitive if necessary.
Regards,
Tote
olbod
11th August 2009, 10:10 AM
Some more pics of the D4.
I must say that it's growing on me the more I think about it.
Barra1
11th August 2009, 11:40 AM
I collect underpants
Aussie, we need you here.....now!;):eek:
Ricey
11th August 2009, 11:44 AM
Aussie, we need you here.....now!;):eek:
ROFL
He might not like 'boxers' though :D
Jamo
11th August 2009, 11:47 AM
making the D4 $10K dearer would push customers to the Cruiser.
Regards,
Tote
Not necessarily Tote. The LC200 Sahara is around $110,000 before options and has the fitout of an SE D3.
PAT303
11th August 2009, 11:53 AM
And thats the reason people are sticking to the 100 series or buying Prado's.I have met,heard of a few people that have bought D3's because of the value they have over the 200 and all of them bar none have been supprised how good the D3 is. Pat
Jamo
11th August 2009, 11:55 AM
I considered the 'Ugly' comments here at length and chose to ponder on them whilst I drove across wet paddocks in 'Mud & Ruts" mode, whilst listening to the Harmon Kardon, relaxing on the Connolly leather and not listening to the TDV6, which is rather quiet; and was upset that I had an 'Ugly' Car.:dbcry::dbcry::BigCry::BigCry::BigCry:
Maybe I should save myself the pain and buy a D1, then sit back on the vinyl and turn up the Ferris to try and drown out the rattle. At least then I'd be safe from those staring eyes, who were no doubt questioning why I had bought such an ugly car.
No, I shall stick with my D3 for now (until I get a D4 that is!;)) and put up with the shame!
stevo68
11th August 2009, 11:58 AM
Aussie, we need you here.....now!;):eek: Its ok...I'm still trying to recover from my shallow swan dive....I'll be in traction for a while ;),
Regards
Stevo
willem
11th August 2009, 01:08 PM
Some more pics of the D4.
I must say that it's growing on me the more I think about it.
Strewth a D4 would be hard to take! ;):D:D:D:D
Willem
VladTepes
11th August 2009, 01:15 PM
I'd have a Disco 4 in a heartbeat if I could afford one.
V8Ian
11th August 2009, 01:35 PM
I considered the 'Ugly' comments here at length and chose to ponder on them whilst I drove across wet paddocks in 'Mud & Ruts" mode, whilst listening to the Harmon Kardon, relaxing on the Connolly leather and not listening to the TDV6, which is rather quiet; and was upset that I had an 'Ugly' Car.:dbcry::dbcry::BigCry::BigCry::BigCry:
Maybe I should save myself the pain and buy a D1, then sit back on the vinyl and turn up the Ferris to try and drown out the rattle. At least then I'd be safe from those staring eyes, who were no doubt questioning why I had bought such an ugly car.
No, I shall stick with my D3 for now (until I get a D4 that is!;)) and put up with the shame!
You have no shame to put up with, you are as entitled to like the car as I am to dislike it. I am in no way disrespecting the vehicle or those who find it attractive. My Disco is sans vinyl, Ferris and rattles, yet I feel no shame.;) Go forth proudly in your D3, just don't ask me like the look of it.:)
PAT303
11th August 2009, 03:15 PM
I considered the 'Ugly' comments here at length and chose to ponder on them whilst I drove across wet paddocks in 'Mud & Ruts" mode, whilst listening to the Harmon Kardon, relaxing on the Connolly leather and not listening to the TDV6, which is rather quiet; and was upset that I had an 'Ugly' Car.:dbcry::dbcry::BigCry::BigCry::BigCry:
Maybe I should save myself the pain and buy a D1, then sit back on the vinyl and turn up the Ferris to try and drown out the rattle. At least then I'd be safe from those staring eyes, who were no doubt questioning why I had bought such an ugly car.
No, I shall stick with my D3 for now (until I get a D4 that is!;)) and put up with the shame!
Jamo when are you getting your D4?,I'm holidaying in Esperance over Xmas,can I have a drive. Pat
willem
11th August 2009, 04:06 PM
I'd have a Disco 4 in a heartbeat if I could afford one.
Me too!
Willem
Graeme
11th August 2009, 04:43 PM
Ozi D4 prices were public info on 1st August, so complete specs must be too. Base model is 2.7 (c/w TR), SE is 3.0, HSE is 3.0 or 5.0.
djhampson
11th August 2009, 05:38 PM
Ozi D4 prices were public info on 1st August, so complete specs must be too. Base model is 2.7 (c/w TR), SE is 3.0, HSE is 3.0 or 5.0.
You got a link to the prices? I can't find em and the dealer wouldn't say anything definitive.
martinozcmax
11th August 2009, 06:00 PM
At the risk of causing a riot, I have changed my mind and like the look of them. They do grow on you. I want one !
:angel:
Graeme
11th August 2009, 06:04 PM
Melb metro on-road prices, advised as being public info. I assume its for white on models where white is available.
DISCOVERY 4 PRICING
Discovery 4 TDV6 2.7L
$68490 RRP
$74675 On Road Price
Discovery 4 TDV6 3.0L
$81990 RRP
$88845 On Road Price
Discovery 4 TDV6 HSE 3.0L
$94990 RRP
$102495 On Road Price
Discovery 4 5.0L V8
$126460 RRP
$135695 On Road Price
It will be interesting to see what discounts, if any, can be obtained.
tony
11th August 2009, 06:10 PM
what a load hot air over nothing, I don't like the shape of a disco either be it D1, D2 D3, D4 or double dimond..(that was'nt a bad drop come to think of it) and i got a d1 as well give me a range rover any day of the week
dullbird
11th August 2009, 06:30 PM
Does anyone know why the difference between RRP and onroad cost differ so much between the models. would it be due to the vehicle weight perhaps?
D4 2.7ltr = 6185
D4 3.0ltr = 6855
D4 HSE 3.0 ltr = 7505
D4 5.0ltr = 9235
PAT303
11th August 2009, 06:30 PM
What happened to all the $50,000 4wd's?.All of them are too dear. Pat
dullbird
11th August 2009, 06:34 PM
What happened to all the $50,000 4wd's?.All of them are too dear. Pat
lmfao even the defender isn't $50,000:D....you a bit out of touch pat:p
Graeme
11th August 2009, 06:42 PM
Does anyone know why the difference between RRP and onroad cost differ so much between the models. would it be due to the vehicle weight perhaps?
D4 2.7ltr = 6185
D4 3.0ltr = 6855
D4 HSE 3.0 ltr = 7505
D4 5.0ltr = 9235
Stamp Duty at rego time and probably higher pre-delivery charges for more bells and whistles.
Hoges
11th August 2009, 07:59 PM
interesting thread! I'm sure there's a sociologist:eek: sitting out there somewhere advising LR how to tap the "real" LR spirit. It's interesting how LR drip feed little dobs of the pioneering Series I "dna" psyche in their sales pitch, make a tentative offering of same in the Defender range then manufacture heavier and more complicated loungechairs... D4/RR etc. Maybe it IS all in the mind...except for the true believers on this forum who actually "get it!"
I luv my P38 with all its foibles... but a D4 @ 2.7 tonnes ...? (watch out for incoming!.....:twisted:)
John W
11th August 2009, 09:22 PM
Stevo, need I remind you that it is unAustralian to be positive. We must knock all good things, it is the only way we know we are loved by our mates if we are ribbed. Who cares (but you) if there are negative comments about LR.
Now for opinion, all land rovers are ugly but I love them, just coz Toyo et al are even uglier does not make LR pretty. Do you buy a 4x4 because it is pretty? Babies, puppies, wombats & chicks are pretty.
PAT303
11th August 2009, 10:40 PM
interesting thread! I'm sure there's a sociologist:eek: sitting out there somewhere advising LR how to tap the "real" LR spirit. It's interesting how LR drip feed little dobs of the pioneering Series I "dna" psyche in their sales pitch, make a tentative offering of same in the Defender range then manufacture heavier and more complicated loungechairs... D4/RR etc. Maybe it IS all in the mind...except for the true believers on this forum who actually "get it!"
I luv my P38 with all its foibles... but a D4 @ 2.7 tonnes ...? (watch out for incoming!.....:twisted:)
Wait a few years,LR's are going on a serious diet.Alloy bodies on alloy subframe,chassis. Pat
Zute
11th August 2009, 11:31 PM
I think the D3/D4 is ugly from some angles. But that wouldnt stop me from buying one. I buy 4wds for what they can do. Now if I had the money and looks came into it, give me a Sport.:woot::burnrubber::BigThumb:
CaverD3
13th August 2009, 08:37 PM
Thats what SWMBO wants, but the dog won't fit in the back of one.:o
With the D3/4: "form follows fuction."
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.4 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.