Advice on getting a S/H entry level DSLR Recommendations

[procrastination inc]

I like taking pictures but constantly bump into the limitations of our sony happy snapper and our cheap canon digi vid camera.

20 yrs ago, I had a nice relationship with a minolta srt101b 35mm slr. But processing costs put an end to that when I had my first kid.

I want:

fast shutter speeds for action shots
Good low light capability
auto everything but easily over-riden manually
robust, my teens will want to use it
macro capability and a decent zoom lens (I had a great 50-235? for my minolta)

I'd rather not spend more than a grand

Any tips?

[moose]

The sony alpha DLSR's take some minolta lenses if you still have them (Minolta and Konica Minolta AF lenses), though a lot of people here will prefer other brands.
I'm very new to the world of photography, but I'm very happy with my sony a350

[bblaze]

Nikon D60 with kit lenses will cover your bases. Lenses are 18-55 and 55- 200 cheers
blaze

[bblaze]

Heres one, just need to add the 55-200 vr lense
Nikon D60 Kit AF-S 18-55mm VR Lens Digital SLR Cameras (http://www.dwidigitalcameras.com.au/store/product.asp?idProduct=1790)
cheers
blaze

[inside]

Pentax K-x should be about a grand when it gets here. You'll have trouble finding a better specified camera for the price.

PENTAX K-x A High-Performance Entry-Class Digital SLR Camera, Packaging Movie Recording, High-Speed Continuous Shooting and User-Friendly Operation in Compact, Lightweight Body (http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/2009/200918.html)

[series3]

Hey mate where are you located?

[feraldisco]

Pentax K-x should be about a grand when it gets here. You'll have trouble finding a better specified camera for the price.

PENTAX K-x A High-Performance Entry-Class Digital SLR Camera, Packaging Movie Recording, High-Speed Continuous Shooting and User-Friendly Operation in Compact, Lightweight Body (http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/2009/200918.html)


$750 at JB Hi-Fi - a lot of camera for the $... and you can even get a bright red one if that's your thing...

[dmdigital]

Pentax K-x is getting good reviews. It's comparable to the Nikon D5000 rather than the D60 or D3000. dpreview.com has just done a comprehensive review of the camera.

[big guy]

I would go Canon or Nikon and for the money you said, go new and get a warranty.
Technology has come so far now that you be amazed what you get.
reason for canon is that they are probably market leaders right now in digital and especially in their compact and entry level digital.
They are not as robust as the nikon.

Happy shopping, go to a shop after xmas and u are sure to get a bargain.
Have a play with all of them and see which feels best in your hands and has fast start up, and easy to use menu.
Easy for you that is not the shop assistant.

[inside]

I would go Canon or Nikon and for the money you said, go new and get a warranty.
Why would you when arguably the best entry level camera at the moment is the K-x? Sure maybe if you had aspiring dreams to become a sports or wildlife professional some day go the canikon route but money is money and it's wise to spend it where you get the most value and this isn't with Canon or Nikon at the entry level DSLR

[dmdigital]

I would go Canon or Nikon and for the money you said, go new and get a warranty.
Technology has come so far now that you be amazed what you get.
reason for canon is that they are probably market leaders right now in digital and especially in their compact and entry level digital.
They are not as robust as the nikon.
Nether the Nikon or Canon entry level DSLR's will take much abuse. Nikon's above this are definitely better sealed than their Canon counter parts. The Nikon does come with slightly better built basic kit lenses than the Canon.

The only reason Canon is considered the market leader at the lower end is Marketing. Originally it was because they had the first entry level DSLR to market. In many markets now the Nikon D40/D60/D3000 outsells the Canon EOS 400D/450D/500D.

The bottom end of the market has now shifted a lot though with more players: Sony (ex-Minolta), Pentax, Olympus, etc. Some of these cameras and their lenses are a much better pick than either the Nikon or Canon. Especially if you are only starting out.

Ergonomically and functionally Nikons are probably the most superior. I was playing with the menus on a D60 this morning alongside my D3s and both work exactly the same. One just has a LOT more options and sub-menus and things to change settings of. But of course this isn't necessarily relevant as you want the camera to feel right when you hold it. For me Nikon wins hands down, but for others it is not the case.

I do agree that going new in the <$1000 range is a better option. Most of these cameras aren't built to take more than about 20,000 to 30,000 pictures.

Also consider the Micro Four-Thirds cameras that are available from Olympus and Panasonic.

[DeanoH]

Canon and Nikon are certainly the market leaders and for a very good reason, they both make excellent cameras; although the Canon vs Nikon choice can become akin to a Holden vs Ford argument. Both are excellent cameras, though there are differences. Visit your friendly second hand camera store and have a play. All things being equal the one that feels the best in your hands is probably the one for you.
I agree with dm_td5 that the Nikon is superior but I'm probably biased.
My sugestion would be to buy a second hand Nikon from a reputable dealer ( I recently bought a D70 body with new battery and charger for <$350 and reckon it was a good buy), but spend the bulk of your budget on a decent lens or lenses. Don't buy cheap glass for your main lens, get a decent factory lens to go with the body. Avoid cheap kit lenses as they can be a real disapopintment. This also allows you to upgrade to a 'better' camera in the future without having to start afresh.

My two bobs worth.

Deano