you have gotta be kkidding me

[tony]

Where have I mentioned another member, I can't help it if someone

has a guilty conscious Inc, even in the kingdom there has to be a bit

of sence

For all you know I might be converting to Budisium and the dog that

bite me goat just got run over....


Tony

P S If i have offended any member (s) on here step up and I'll see if I can set the record stright




You have received an infraction at Australian Land Rover Owners
Dear tony,

You have received an infraction at Australian Land Rover Owners.

Reason: Personal Attack on Other Member(s)
-------
entirely dissapointing behavior..

and in no way acceptable around here tony...
-------

This infraction is worth 3 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:
http://www.aulro.com/afvb/general-ch...ml#post1123236 (http://www.aulro.com/afvb/general-chat/93268-karma.html#post1123236)
Quote:
Christ its good

might even become a Buddhist its so good




sorry Baz, inc I just could'nt resist:angel::angel::angel::angel::angel::angel:



Tony
All the best,
Australian Land Rover Owners
__________________
1959 SII 88 O'drive ARN 110-574
1985 4BD1 110 - The Incasaurus
1996 Tactical Trailer ARN 234-678
1976 Hi-Ace - Toyosawarsuswrex
-= Military Vehicle Collectors AU =- (http://www.mvca.com.au/)
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2009/11/251.jpg

[incisor]

you were guilty by your own admission mate

you apologised in your own post...

i might add that i dont give a flying fig who it was directed at, the behavior is unacceptable.

[tony]

you were guilty by your own admission mate

you apologised in your own post...

i might add that i dont give a flying fig who it was directed at, the behavior is unacceptable.



Mate I couldnt aggree more theres some things a bloke just never does or at least anyone with any self respect never does.still its a good wake up call thoes that offer the hand of frindship most probley have a switch blade in the other

[twitchy]

apparently they aren't kiddin ya mate!!

[Redback]

Is that sorry directed at me:eek:

Did I miss something:confused:

[Blknight.aus]

Makes me wish I'd seen the original post.

Must have been a corker and think Im sure I've missed something good here.

[incisor]

I've missed something good here.
nope....

[twitchy]

nope....


Man of few words :D

[clean32]

Man of few words :D

and a delete button

[incisor]

long as your not wearing it i wouldnt be complaining...

;)

i just love this time of year...

peace on earth and goodwill to all men and women on earth

my arse... it seems

[EchiDna]

can we hold a poll on the 100% removal of politics and religion as discussion topics? I for one can't stand the discussions as they just end up in slanging matches most of the time. I'm here to discuss Landies (potentially religiously I admit :)) and what we do with em, not what I personally believe or for the purpose of arguing with someone that I'm unlikely to ever meet that believes the polar opposite to me...

[The ho har's]

The answer to that is.....no!! ;)


and that's why I deleted my post ...we don't want to upset Inc or he may well close down this site and then we would be on Skpe :eek: or fackbook:eek:or ever:o


Mrs ho har;)

[incisor]

you are having me on surely

if enough people decided it shouldnt be used i would consider it ;)

[vnx205]

can we hold a poll on the 100% removal of politics and religion as discussion topics? I for one can't stand the discussions as they just end up in slanging matches most of the time. I'm here to discuss Landies (potentially religiously I admit :)) and what we do with em, not what I personally believe or for the purpose of arguing with someone that I'm unlikely to ever meet that believes the polar opposite to me...

If such a poll were to be posted, I would vote against the removal of such threads.

I don't believe I have ever once looked at a post that looked as if it had something to do with a P38a. I have only once or twice looked at one on D3s and Freelanders. Anyone else like me who has a deeply held religious belief that they are not proper Land Rovers :p is free to ignore them too. They can also do the same with threads on religion, politics, the economy, the GFC, the AFL, Y2k, PMT, WMDs, ABS, GBRMPA and other such irrelevant posts.

I quite like being amused, entertained, embarrassed, horrified, informed, intrigued, reassured, puzzled and provoked by the comments members make about a whole range of topics. If the thread ceases to do any of those things, I just stop reading it. :)

[dobbo]

can we hold a poll on the 100% removal of politics and religion as discussion topics? I for one can't stand the discussions as they just end up in slanging matches most of the time. I'm here to discuss Landies (potentially religiously I admit :)) and what we do with em, not what I personally believe or for the purpose of arguing with someone that I'm unlikely to ever meet that believes the polar opposite to me...


I tend to agree, religious talk turns ordinary people into complete Farnickles, but, I don't agree with such white washing of life. So I wouldn't vote for it.


Speaking of whitewashing life, If Tony was to personally attack another member, he wouldn't be doing it online. Up close and personal is his modus operandi. What has been posted was in jest and sarcasm.

Mind you I have been pinged for the same in the past.

[B92 8NW]

Mind you I have been pinged for the same in the past.

Probably in part my fault. I genuinely apologise to you.

I've met a lot of people off this forum recently, made good friends, and I'd be inclined to caution anybody against drawing conclusions or creating animosity because of a difference of opinion online.

[EchiDna]

If such a poll were to be posted, I would vote against the removal of such threads.

I don't believe I have ever once looked at a post that looked as if it had something to do with a P38a. I have only once or twice looked at one on D3s and Freelanders. Anyone else like me who has a deeply held religious belief that they are not proper Land Rovers :p is free to ignore them too. They can also do the same with threads on religion, politics, the economy, the GFC, the AFL, Y2k, PMT, WMDs, ABS, GBRMPA and other such irrelevant posts.

I quite like being amused, entertained, embarrassed, horrified, informed, intrigued, reassured, puzzled and provoked by the comments members make about a whole range of topics. If the thread ceases to do any of those things, I just stop reading it. :)

A very rational approach which I do agree with - IMHO, it's the *ahem* shall we say 'less rational' among us that tend to give rise to raising moderator's blood pressure - the mod's job is crappy enough as it is without the slanging matches that go on related to religion and politics.

[vnx205]

A very rational approach which I do agree with - IMHO, it's the *ahem* shall we say 'less rational' among us that tend to give rise to raising moderator's blood pressure - the mod's job is crappy enough as it is without the slanging matches that go on related to religion and politics.

I understand your point, but i remember that a good while back, before I worked out some of the characters on this forum and before I came to understand a bit about the way some members' sense of humour worked, the first post that I noticed where I felt that someone was slagging off at another member was not about religion or politics.

The topic was about someone's ability to drive on wet grass (or something like that). So it is possible to be irrational or offensive, or appear to be, on any topic, even how to drive Land Rover.

Just in case someone has a long enough memory to remember the thread I am talking about, I should add that now that I know just a little more about the members involved in what I thought at the time was a heated exchange, with hindsight, I am not sure that it was anything more than a good natured ribbing about driving technique.

In spite of the fact that I disagree, I think I can understand some of the reasons some forums have a complete ban on what they call "religious debates".

They don't mean debates about religion. They mean debates about things which can't be proven, where people have firmly held views and where no-one is likely to change their mind. Examples of what they call "religious debates" would be Holden v Ford, AFL v ARL, Windows v Mac v Linux. I suspect that TDi v TD5 v Puma v Isuzu would fall into that same category.

However, even if i think people are talking rubbish (in my opinion), I am often interested to see how their minds work, so I am still against the idea of a ban.

[B92 8NW]

The wet grass incident was me. I was making a joke, it was poorly executed and I reacted badly. I also did not know the personalities of many members at that point.

Several members of this forum who have driven off road with me will know that I am not an idiot, and that I can competently drive off road. I am not fearful of admitting mistakes and I'm not, and have never claimed to be omniscient.

[hiline]

The wet grass incident was me. I was making a joke, it was poorly executed and I reacted badly. I also did not know the personalities of many members at that point.

Several members of this forum who have driven off road with me will know that I am not an idiot, and that I can competently drive off road. I am not fearful of admitting mistakes and I'm not, and have never claimed to be omniscient.

well thats debatable :angel::wasntme:

sorry mate i couldn't resist :D:D

[clean32]

I understand your point, but i remember that a good while back, before I worked out some of the characters on this forum and before I came to understand a bit about the way some members' sense of humour worked, the first post that I noticed where I felt that someone was slagging off at another member was not about religion or politics.

The topic was about someone's ability to drive on wet grass (or something like that). So it is possible to be irrational or offensive, or appear to be, on any topic, even how to drive Land Rover.

Just in case someone has a long enough memory to remember the thread I am talking about, I should add that now that I know just a little more about the members involved in what I thought at the time was a heated exchange, with hindsight, I am not sure that it was anything more than a good natured ribbing about driving technique.

In spite of the fact that I disagree, I think I can understand some of the reasons some forums have a complete ban on what they call "religious debates".

They don't mean debates about religion. They mean debates about things which can't be proven, where people have firmly held views and where no-one is likely to change their mind. Examples of what they call "religious debates" would be Holden v Ford, AFL v ARL, Windows v Mac v Linux. I suspect that TDi v TD5 v Puma v Isuzu would fall into that same category.

However, even if i think people are talking rubbish (in my opinion), I am often interested to see how their minds work, so I am still against the idea of a ban.

Agree Isuzu is designed By god and no further evolution is necessary. ( well apart from a turbo)

[Redback]

Agree Isuzu is designed By god and no further evolution is necessary. ( well apart from a turbo)

and some sound deadening, decent door seals............................................. .............:p

[The ho har's]

Agree Isuzu is designed By god and no further evolution is necessary. ( well apart from a turbo)


We can have further discussion on this matter in person when we meet at the BBQ:p:D


Mrs ho har:angel:

[clean32]

We can have further discussion on this matter in person when we meet at the BBQ:p:D


Mrs ho har:angel:

LOL

50 Bucks says you mental picture of me, dont fit LOL

we will probably head up early thursday and set up camp in morgan national park say finished by 8am. if we dont like it we may just move up and down the riverlands back in adelaide monday night.

[adm333]

I don't believe I have ever once looked at a post that looked as if it had something to do with a P38a. I have only once or twice looked at one on D3s and Freelanders. Anyone else like me who has a deeply held religious belief that they are not proper Land Rovers :p is free to ignore them too.

[bawl]

Alright, I know they're not proper Land Rovers, but I tried driving a proper Land Rover and I spilled my Latte all down my lilac cardigan.

[clean32]

and some sound deadening, decent door seals............................................. .............:p

why do you need then?? if they were necessary then God would have provided them LOL

[The ho har's]

[bawl]

Alright, I know they're not proper Land Rovers, but I tried driving a proper Land Rover and I spilled my Latte all down my lilac cardigan.


:Rolling::Rolling::Rolling::Rolling:

:TakeABow:


Mrs ho har:angel:

[olbod]

An God is the one true God.

[The ho har's]

LOL

50 Bucks says you mental picture of me, dont fit LOL

we will probably head up early thursday and set up camp in morgan national park say finished by 8am. if we dont like it we may just move up and down the riverlands back in adelaide monday night.


as it is aften said you don't know someone till you actually meet them;)

We may be able to stay at diggers friends place yet will PM you:D


Mrs ho har:angel:

[dobbo]

and some sound deadening, decent door seals............................................. .............:p



Baz, in all honesty after the first week you hardly notice the sound.



After the 3rd ear syringe in 6 months.