PDA

View Full Version : 101 V8 bellhousings to R380



Lotz-A-Landies
1st January 2010, 05:31 PM
Just a question about 101 LT95 bellhousings, I believe they are shorter than the regular RRc bellhousings (with a shorter primary pinion as well).

Has anyone ever successfully grafted a 101 with an R380 and did they use the short 101-LT95 bellhousing?

What happens to the R380 primary pinion which would presumably be too long?

I would like to lose about 100-200mm off the overall length of a RV8 and R380/LT230.

Diana

Dave Jump
3rd January 2010, 11:47 AM
Hi Diana

I've been investigating putting an R380 into my 101 for a while but have put the idea on the back burner after your roverdrive information. If you also factor in the winch pto drive on the 101 there is quite a bit of work in making the R380 fit. I thought the way forward with the bellhousing would be to use one from the 2wd applications of the R380 or LT77. The bellhousing for both is the same but the pinion must be from the MGB RV8 which I think is the only 2wd R380 application ( could be wrong? ). I looked at this for the 101 and it gets the propshaft drive flanges close to their original positions with the LT95. However I was recently told the 2wd bellhousing wont accomodate the larger clutch used on 4wd vehicles but I haven't checked this out yet.
Hope this helps
Dave

101RRS
3rd January 2010, 12:31 PM
I have somewhere in the back of my mind that the bellhousing and input shaft for a R380/300TDi Defender is shorter than a the V8 version in the Disco. Am I right or wrong?? If correct is this any use??

Garry

isuzurover
4th January 2010, 03:15 PM
I have somewhere in the back of my mind that the bellhousing and input shaft for a R380/300TDi Defender is shorter than a the V8 version in the Disco. Am I right or wrong?? If correct is this any use??

Garry

The LT77/S in the defender had a short bellhousing, and I believe some interim models had the same bellhousing with R380.

Ashcroft have recently started selling the latter (R380 short bellhousing)
Ashcroft Transmissions (http://www.ashcroft-transmissions.co.uk/part_119.html)

The downside is they only come in a Tdi/5 bolt pattern.

http://217.34.53.228:9876/uploads/44L.jpg

As the V8 has a smaller spigot diameter, I can't imagine it would be too hard to buy one of these, machine the input shaft down, and machine the engine side of the bellhousing down and weld a new ring on which mates to a V8.

101 Ron
6th January 2010, 11:53 AM
The 101 I drove with the R380 gearbox and later transfer case used standard bell housing and the the gear box mounts were moved rearwards to make the thing fit.
How the the standard R380 stuff could fit with the steep tailshaft angles was because the chassis was lenghten to 130 inches.......search for the thread in this section of aulro.
Why would you want to go to a weaker and less reliable R380 gearbox when the the LT90 works so well ?
I have just arrived home from Holidays pulling 1.5 tonne of trailer cruising at 100 kph at 2800 rpm with stock 3.5 litre v8 on gas using stock gearbag.
transfercase ratios,diff ratios and overdrives can all be changed on a 101 to get what you want and there has been much discussion about this in previous threads..
Garrycol has recently fitted the fairly overdrive to his 101 and it would be interesting to hear his thoughts.
use the fairly overdrive only in top gear and it should last a long time.
I could be wrong....but I though a R380 is a straight 5 speed box and not overdrive in 5th any how and shouldnt make any difference.
Interestingly my 101 starts off from standstill n 2nd gear with light loads with first only used for hill starts . off road work and getting heavy trailer moving from rest.

101RRS
6th January 2010, 01:35 PM
The Fairy overdrive works as advertised - on the highway engine speed is reduced - I do not have a tacho to check by how much - fuel consumption on gas is improved by 10% and the truck is a little quieter (I do not have the O/d whine most complain about) though it is tyres and noise from the exhaust pipe that is unchanged. Top speed is unchanged (113-115kph) and struggles to get there with O/d.

With O/d in the 101 is a bit of a slug and as expected is slow to accelerate and dies pretty quick - however on mine I find 3rd gear much more usable with O/d on than when it is out - 3rd normal is a bit low when going up hill where 3rd (O/d) is just right.

Overall I do not like using O/d unless cruising on open flat highways - the 101 is just so much sweeter to drive with no O/d. I guess it is that the torque of the 3.5 is just a little shy of what is needed to run higher gearing. But then as said - the O/d works well for what it is supposed to do. I think with high speed gears and O/d it may be a bit much for a 3.5 in all but ideal conditions - downhill with a tail wind - certainly going into wind would be a problem.

PeterP is putting in both into his 101 so I will be interested to see how it goes - though he has a new engine and is hi compression. I have a 3.9 to rebuild one day and am looking at options for this project if it ever happens so watching this thread with interest. As I have a good spare LT95 out of a Stage 1 was contemplating using the gearbox as spare parts for my 101 and cutting off the tfr case and connecting it to a R380 and a short bellhousing on the back of my 3.9 and putting that in the 101. Short Gearbox/tfr length is important in a 101 (same as a RRC with a 5" lift). I think it would easily pull higher gearing using combinations of R380 5 speed, different tfr case gears and even the Fairy O/d.

Any one tell me the length of an R380 gearbox housing and how far the output shafts and input shafts stick out of the gearbox.

Cheers

Garry

isuzurover
6th January 2010, 04:07 PM
Why would you want to go to a weaker and less reliable R380 gearbox when the the LT90 works so well ?



I could be wrong....but I though a R380 is a straight 5 speed box and not overdrive in 5th any how and shouldnt make any difference.


I didn't think Diana was talking about fitting it to a 101 necessarily???

You are wrong. 5th is 0.77:1 in diesel boxes and 0.73:1 in V8 boxes.

The R380 seems to hold up behind a 4BD1T (including in 120s and 130's). I can't see why it wouldn't hold up in a 101.

101 Ron
6th January 2010, 05:16 PM
Diana is looking to fit a ex disco V8 and R380 into a 109 F/C and I can see no problem with that other than finding room for the motor under the cabin.
The longer chassis and different layout should help lenght wise.
Dave jump is looking to fit the R380 to a 101 and is a different machine with its own problems.
I own a defender with a 300 TDI and a R380 and I know witch gearbag lasts longer and doesnt drop brass at every oil drain or wears the splines and front main shaft bearing.
I also have had a lot of time with a Stage one V8 series three table top with LT95 and it never had any gearbox or transfercase weaknesses.

isuzurover
7th January 2010, 01:45 AM
I know witch gearbag lasts longer and doesnt drop brass at every oil drain or wears the splines and front main shaft bearing.


No arguments here. However if and when I acquire an FC, it will be getting an isuzu engine and isuzu 6-speed...

101 Ron
7th January 2010, 07:32 AM
Garrycol
I noticed the big gap between 3rd and 4th gear with your 101 by both driving and following it.
My 101 doesnt have that gap.
Something is different and I do not know what it is.
The effect is 3rd gear is lower than normal.
I wonder if your gears in the transfercase have all ready been change from standard and to what.?
Garry your motor is going hard enough and so it is the gearing making the difference.
When I drove your 101 on the oberon/ gouldburn rd that time the top speed gearing didnt appear lower that mine and i had the feeling you have higher ratio tranfer gears all ready fitted ?
Are range rover. stageone and 101 gearbox ratios all the same with the old 4 speed.

Lotz-A-Landies
7th January 2010, 07:44 AM
The LT77/S in the defender had a short bellhousing, and I believe some interim models had the same bellhousing with R380.

Ashcroft have recently started selling the latter (R380 short bellhousing)
Ashcroft Transmissions (http://www.ashcroft-transmissions.co.uk/part_119.html)

<snip>
Thanks Ben

Ashcrofts page is enlightening, but it doesn't look like the short bell-housing will solve my problem as it is only 30mm less and I'm looking for 170mm.

Seems another solution is required. :( :( :(

Diana

101RRS
7th January 2010, 08:58 AM
I noticed the big gap between 3rd and 4th gear with your 101 by both driving and following it.
My 101 doesnt have that gap.
Something is different and I do not know what it is.


I agree - I am tempted to pull the top plate off the tfr case and count teeth. Likewise in Abercrombie trip - I was often having to go into low range when you were able to stay in hi range. Also as you mentioned - are alternative gears available for the LT95 that could explain 3rd gear.

Garry

isuzurover
7th January 2010, 02:57 PM
Thanks Ben

Ashcrofts page is enlightening, but it doesn't look like the short bell-housing will solve my problem as it is only 30mm less and I'm looking for 170mm.

Seems another solution is required. :( :( :(

Diana

I think you misunderstand Diana. That bellhousing is 30mm shorter than an LT77 SHORT Bellhousing. This is because the R380 is 30mm longer than an LT77.

You would save ~150mm as a rough guess. This is what a standard (long) R380 bellhousing looks like:
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/imported/2010/01/1189.jpg

And a side-by-side comparison:
http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-snc1/v320/233/43/667984881/n667984881_1293056_4982.jpg

























I agree - I am tempted to pull the top plate off the tfr case and count teeth. Likewise in Abercrombie trip - I was often having to go into low range when you were able to stay in hi range. Also as you mentioned - are alternative gears available for the LT95 that could explain 3rd gear.

Garry

LT95s came with the high range ratio options:

0.996:1
1.11:1
1.17:1 (FC101)
1.34:1

It is possible someone has fitted 1.11 or 0.996 ratios to yours, however you should notice the difference in all gears.

I don't believe there were any options for main box ratios.

EDIT2 - I just realised you have a fairey. I take it you didn't fit it? I suspect most would be 1.11:1 ratio???

101 Ron
7th January 2010, 04:05 PM
This transmission is from a Dec 1994 build TDI300 defender.
IMG]http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p299/101Ron/DSCF0842.jpg[/IMG]
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p299/101Ron/DSCF0843.jpg
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p299/101Ron/DSCF0844.jpg
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p299/101Ron/DSCF0845.jpg
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p299/101Ron/DSCF0846.jpg
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p299/101Ron/DSCF0847.jpg
It is a very low K spare I have.
gearbox measures 390mm end face to end face.
bell housing measures 259mm end face to end face.
Bell housing as stock is very long with alot of wasted space inside.

Dave Jump
7th January 2010, 08:39 PM
Hi Guys

Just to add my opinion to the gearing debate. I ran 0.996 gears and an overdrive on my 101 in the UK and as Garry says it's ok in ideal conditions. It's also worth noting that was on bargrips, I now run XZL's which are noticably taller.
Looking at the ratios in a range rover LT95 and a Range rover R380, the R380's are higher. Presumably due to the higher power developed by the later V8's.
I like the idea of putting an R380 in the 101 but agree with Ron the LT95 is a solid box and if Roverdrive come through with an overdrive I'll have all the gears I need.
Also I can't believe all these gearboxes people have lying around!

isuzurover
7th January 2010, 10:32 PM
This transmission is from a Dec 1994 build TDI300 defender.

Don't want to sell it do you Ron???

101 Ron
7th January 2010, 10:54 PM
No sale.......too hard to come by good R380s
I was lucky and unlucky to have it.
My defender was involved in front end smash and extensively damaged at the 60k mark.
the front diff moved back and broke the alloy bolt ears on the gearbox and transfercase housings.
With the repairs a complete new gearbox,diff and transfercase was fitted.
all the internals I will use to rebuild my current transmission if it ever gives trouble.

101RRS
8th January 2010, 05:14 PM
LT95s came with the high range ratio options:

0.996:1
1.11:1
1.17:1 (FC101)
1.34:1

It is possible someone has fitted 1.11 or 0.996 ratios to yours, however you should notice the difference in all gears.

I don't believe there were any options for main box ratios.

EDIT2 - I just realised you have a fairey. I take it you didn't fit it? I suspect most would be 1.11:1 ratio???

Ron and I were wondering if there were different gear ratios available for the gearbox (know about tfr case) - my third gear seems a bit lower than other LT95s but other gears seem the same.

I have fitted the overdrive and it is a nice quiet specimen. Just haven't worked out the linkages yet - so it is the climb under to engage O/d for highway runs and climb back under for to take it out for around town and 4wding.

I think the o/ds are about .78:1.

Garry

101RRS
8th January 2010, 05:18 PM
Don't want to sell it do you Ron???

He is going to give it to me :D

Garry