one_iota
2nd March 2010, 07:03 AM
Came across this in the Sydney Morning Herald:
Automotive Industry | Recalls | Car recalls | Toyota (http://smh.drive.com.au/motor-news/total-recall-20100226-p84n.html)
The article reports on vehicle recalls but the author seems to have a tenuous grasp on the facts:
Careful wording is the name of the game for product recall notices, with most companies perfecting the art of the understatement when announcing recalls.
Land Rover, which had a problem with windscreen fitment on its Defender, noted that "full windshield retention may not be achieved in the event of a crash of sufficient severity to deploy the front airbags". Translation: the windscreen could fall out in a prang.
I guess the rest of the article should be taken with a grain of salt.
Automotive Industry | Recalls | Car recalls | Toyota (http://smh.drive.com.au/motor-news/total-recall-20100226-p84n.html)
The article reports on vehicle recalls but the author seems to have a tenuous grasp on the facts:
Careful wording is the name of the game for product recall notices, with most companies perfecting the art of the understatement when announcing recalls.
Land Rover, which had a problem with windscreen fitment on its Defender, noted that "full windshield retention may not be achieved in the event of a crash of sufficient severity to deploy the front airbags". Translation: the windscreen could fall out in a prang.
I guess the rest of the article should be taken with a grain of salt.