Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: I got some new glass!

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Excellent choice, now get the X1.4 converter for your close up shots

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    167
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by stooge View Post
    Woooooooooooaaaaaaaaaaahhhhh! That is nice, see bigger is better and already a great shot shown!


    Quote Originally Posted by Chucaro View Post
    Excellent choice, now get the X1.4 converter for your close up shots
    Thanks, I think I'll get a new body and a super wide zoom before the tc.

    Was looking at the X2 though, hopefully with the next generation body's I'll be able to bump up the iso to compensate for the light loss.

    Anyone have a tc? does it noticeably affect your image quality?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by C0L0N3L View Post




    Thanks, I think I'll get a new body and a super wide zoom before the tc.

    Was looking at the X2 though, hopefully with the next generation body's I'll be able to bump up the iso to compensate for the light loss.

    Anyone have a tc? does it noticeably affect your image quality?
    I have a friend who is an excellent photographer and among his collection of lens he is using the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 with TC
    Have a look some of his examples [ame="http://www.ausphotography.net.au/forum/showthread.php't=53464"]HERE[/ame]

  4. #14
    dmdigital's Avatar
    dmdigital is offline OldBushie Vendor

    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arnhem Land, NT
    Posts
    8,492
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have the 1.7x TC. Optically this is the best before they brought out the new aspherical 2x TCIII. No problems at all with using it. You loose 1.5 stops (f/2.8->f/4), a 2x will loose 2 stops. So f/2.8 means you would be back to f/5.6 with the 2x. What body are you using? The more important issue at f/5.6 and above is the AF sensor's ability in lower light.
    MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6

    Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    167
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucaro View Post
    I have a friend who is an excellent photographer and among his collection of lens he is using the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 with TC
    Have a look some of his examples HERE
    Quote Originally Posted by dmdigital View Post
    I have the 1.7x TC. Optically this is the best before they brought out the new aspherical 2x TCIII. No problems at all with using it. You loose 1.5 stops (f/2.8->f/4), a 2x will loose 2 stops. So f/2.8 means you would be back to f/5.6 with the 2x. What body are you using? The more important issue at f/5.6 and above is the AF sensor's ability in lower light.
    Hmm not really liking the bokeh from the X2 I thought the larger focal length it would be a lot smoother.

    Yeah I have the D3000 at the moment wich is... very basic. I think I would be using it with the tc for sport/bright outdoors type shots so AF shouldn't be an issue.

  6. #16
    dmdigital's Avatar
    dmdigital is offline OldBushie Vendor

    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arnhem Land, NT
    Posts
    8,492
    Total Downloaded
    0
    At long focus (towards infinity on the lens) the hyperfocal distance even with f/2.8 means you have a reasonable DOF anyway.

    e.g. 200mm f/2.8 30m is about 2.6m whilst f/4 is about 3.5m and f/5.6 is 5m

    The AF issue is to do with the AF sensor which sits below the sensor. On the D3000 this is a fairly good performer in low light. The D40/50/60 all had a much harder time of it. This is also a problem with some of the super zooms (e.g. Sigma 18-250) as they can go out to f/6.5 at the long end of the zoom and this can be problematic for the focus system.

    One thing to watch with that 80-200 is the weight it places on the lens mount. Bodies like the D3000 don't like the weight of the heavier lenses on the mount as much as the D300/D3 bodies or even the D90. I would be ensuring you get in the habit of picking the camera and lens up by the lens barrel. Also always mount on a tripod/monopod using the foot on the lens, not the camera body.
    MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6

    Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]

  7. #17
    dmdigital's Avatar
    dmdigital is offline OldBushie Vendor

    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arnhem Land, NT
    Posts
    8,492
    Total Downloaded
    0


    70-200 f/2.8 VR + 1.7 TC @ 340mm f/4.8 1/400sec.
    MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6

    Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Adelaide, SA
    Posts
    2,221
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That's exactly what I'd be doing, but that's based on my shooting preferences.

    Quote Originally Posted by C0L0N3L View Post


    Thanks, I think I'll get a new body and a super wide zoom before the tc.

    Was looking at the X2 though, hopefully with the next generation body's I'll be able to bump up the iso to compensate for the light loss.

    Anyone have a tc? does it noticeably affect your image quality?
    I've got all of the above (a 70-200mm, a 2xTC, and a 10-22mm wide-angle zoom -all in Canon), and the wide angle zoom gets significanty more use than the TC.

    I bought the 2xTC for a one-off occasion, and have only used it a handful of times since. I wouldn't be too worried about the loss of two F-stops from f/2.8 for occasional use. Mind you, at 2xTC and 1.6 multiplication factor for a smaller sensor, my 70-200mm f/2.8L turns into a 224-560mm f/5.6 monster.

    I have not had any problems shooting normal moving subjects or wildlife in daylight, even when used without a tripod / remote shutter release. That said, it depends on the type of photography you're into.

    I imagine it would be invaluable for bird photography in particular, and that's where an extra f-stop will definately count...

    I myself don't have the patience required for that & tend to do a lot more landscape / architecture / portraiture & general travel photography, so don't get much use out of the 2xTC.

    Just my $0.02 worth.

    Cheers

    Bojan

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    167
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Nice shot.

    I think I'll have a good play with all of the tc when Im closer to buying one.

    Bojan, yeah I'm with you, I mainly shoot landscapes.. not too much patience for wildlife, though I did chase a dragonfly for 20 mins today...

    Had to manual focus.. found it too difficult to track with the AF.. missed it a little bit but I like the bokeh.


  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hobart Tasmania
    Posts
    3,690
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I thought the other issue with the tc2 was IQ - images become softer and for birding this is not a good thing!

    C0L0N3L - chasing a dragon fly for 20min to me sounds like you got PLENTY of patience

    Manual focus too, not a bad effort at all, in fact damn good to even get it really. Bokeh is fantastic too, soft apearance adds to sharpness of subject.
    Carlos
    1994 Land Rover Discovery 300tdi
    1963 Land Rover Series 2a 88
    Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu3...BtsNIuTyGkAo5w
    Instagram: https://instagram.com/rover_tasmania/

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!