Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: What's your most used lens?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Aussie Expat in NZ
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kenleyfred View Post
    Very interested in this thread. I am soon getting my first SLR and have chosen the Nikon D7000. Was going to be asking a similar question of you learned people as to what lens I should start with.
    Kenley.
    Hi Kenley,

    Well done on the D7000 - its an astonishing camera. I pair mine up with the 17-55 F2.8 nearly all the time, they are very well matched. As it is a cropped frame (no good for full frame cameras) lens you can get them second hand for a very reasonable price.

    Since I've had these, I have not picked up my other cameras!
    Hercules: 1986 110 Isuzu 3.9 (4BD1-T)
    Brutus: 1969 109 ExMil 2a FFT (loved and lost)

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    892
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I don't really enjoy zoom, I much prefer prime. Looking to get a (Nikon) 50mm 1.4 as soon as my finances allow...settling for the D over the G looks like my only option to avoid a 1.8.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Aussie Expat in NZ
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LSD_AUTOMOTIVE View Post
    I don't really enjoy zoom, I much prefer prime. Looking to get a (Nikon) 50mm 1.4 as soon as my finances allow...settling for the D over the G looks like my only option to avoid a 1.8.
    Yeah the 1.8 is very disappointing, anything less than 2.8 will be soft and without contrast.
    Hercules: 1986 110 Isuzu 3.9 (4BD1-T)
    Brutus: 1969 109 ExMil 2a FFT (loved and lost)

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    892
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by flagg View Post
    Yeah the 1.8 is very disappointing, anything less than 2.8 will be soft and without contrast.
    I've heard as much, I guess the price is an indicator though. Easily under $150...I just ordered a new 1.4D from the US (significantly more than $150!). This thread is dangerous Perhaps I'll swing for the G when I upgrade camera down the track. I'm only a hobbyist

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by flagg View Post
    Yeah the 1.8 is very disappointing, anything less than 2.8 will be soft and without contrast.
    The 50mm f/1.8 very disappointing
    It is an awesome glass regarding as one of the best premiers for the money after the f/1.4 G lens.
    It is not only mi opinion, have a look THIS reputable site.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Goolwa SA - but top ender forever
    Posts
    2,515
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kenleyfred View Post
    Very interested in this thread. I am soon getting my first SLR and have chosen the Nikon D7000. Was going to be asking a similar question of you learned people as to what lens I should start with.
    Kenley.
    A fine choice of camera, the 64 (million) $$ question is what do you want to take photos of?

    Primes (f2.8 or lower) are the fastest and best for low light but you are locked to one size

    Zooms are more flexible in photo size but you are limited in the speed and light level you can take photos in.

    best rule of thumb, the highest quality glass you can afford the better off you are.

    I'm still trying to work out which ones though hence the thread to ask the people who use them

    What I dont want to end up with is 10 lenses that seemed like a good idea at the time but only end up using a couple of them regularly
    Last edited by blitz; 9th May 2011 at 03:44 PM. Reason: dylexic head

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It is very hard to answer the question without knowing for what the camera is going to be used.

    As an example, I dedicate my photography to nature so I use only one lens for landscaping (Tokina 12-24 f/4) and one lens for birds, wildlife and close up shots (insects flora etc) the 70-300VR
    I have in the second body a Nikon 35-70 which I use for family shots but not very often.
    If you are going to use the lens for general photography (walk about and family shots) perhaps the best out there will be the 24-70
    If money is a problem the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR for under $1200.00 can be an option.

    Cheers

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    892
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucaro View Post
    The 50mm f/1.8 very disappointing
    It is an awesome glass regarding as one of the best premiers for the money after the f/1.4 G lens.
    It is not only mi opinion, have a look THIS reputable site.
    I've had a number of professional (portrait) photogs steer me away from the 1.8...it's good especially when taking into account the price but the 1.4 is better. From what I've heard the main issue with the 1.8 is the lower apertures not giving decent results. Basically - Low light situations where you need to open all the way up and you get proper exposure indicated but you're getting very soft results and spend too much time in PP... It's not worth it. For me I shoot children (ha) so you can't be too far away from them either - if you need the lower aps for decent bokeh and such you want them to still be crisp... Not to mention if you have to stick to a higher ap then your shutter speed will start to suffer and the flailing limbs of a 6 month old = unnattractive motion blurs If you're taking in a landscape or you've got older, better behaved subjects I am sure the 1.8 is great....but it won't be the best option for all situations I think the general consensus is a full stop adjustment will make the 1.4 and 1.8 comparable in terms of sharpness - but I want as much range as possible. The 1.8 would no doubt kick butt compared to a zoom in terms of sharpness though

    edit to add an example of what I mean
    http://www.clubsnap.com/forums/threa...w-clubsnappers!

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Tyrendarra Vic (South West Vic )
    Posts
    1,729
    Total Downloaded
    0
    For me Nikon 18-200 on my D300 98% of the time Excelent all round lense & Tamron 28-200 on my F100 again 98% . Don't have to change lenses much / lazy I know but faster.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!