Moon photos!

Conspiracy theories abound! hahaha Actually if you look at the front tyre right side below the gold camera you can see a tyre track heading rear and to the left. There is also a horizontal set of tracks between the astronaut and the rover, well behind the astronaut lol. I remember the movie "Capricorn one" and the recent,, well within the last decade,, conspiracy theory about not going to the moon. It does make for good conversation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chucaro

It is interesting that there are not visible the marks of the tyres on the sand. Photo shoped image by NASA :D
A

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chucaro

I did not base my comments on conspiracy bad in what appears as a bad post processing job not to conceal facts but to touch up possible defects on the original before dveloping.
Looks in that way to me.

---

Wasnt having a crack at you personally, just one of those broad general things. :p:p:p:p:p:p

Yes love good conspiracy.

I have read of amateur radio operators using their gear to listen to the signals from Apollo missions. This requires pointing high gain antennas at the moon. Not much point if they weren't there;)

MMMmm Maybe they had a repeater installed on the moon;)

And back to the thread - there is absolutely 1000's of similar images on that site - so they must have had a big set to fake them all.

As for photshopping this may have been a little difficult in 1972 when that photo was published - perhaps hand painted changes were available but I think that would show.

Mythbusters did a good show on Moon Conspiracy Theories. They recreated a moon scene to demonstrate how the shadows don't have to be parallel and also why the flag can be seen to wave in some shots.

forgive my intrusion,,
but in the first shot,
why is the light beam on the right cut off?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift

forgive my intrusion,,
but in the first shot,
why is the light beam on the right cut off?

---

I think its a pano thats been stitched together from several photos.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift

forgive my intrusion,,
but in the first shot,
why is the light beam on the right cut off?

---

It's a mosiac of a least 2 photos. Probably avoiding pointing lens directly at the sun.

Thanks sleepy!
I'm reading the tech debrief of Apollo13:cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sleepy

You can see with this shot that no stars are visible:

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/im...09/04/1329.jpg

---

How many stars do you wanna see....i see about 50...on each flag:cool::eek:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sleepy

Thought this link might be of interest to you lot:

I've heard there are still a couple of Hassleblad's still on the surface (Not sure if you could still get film for them though:D)

---

Of course you can still get film for them, they are a 6x6cm frame size and use 120 format film which is still extensively used in professional photography as well as by amateurs. :D