Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 92

Thread: driving around with full set of bonnet tools is it ok

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bracken Ridge - Brisbane - QLD
    Posts
    14,276
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post

    The Perentie is only ADR certified for two front seat passengers for on road use. The rear sideways facing seats are installed only for use in military restricted areas, where state road rules don't apply. e.g. the 1/15 RNSW Lancers had several Perentie 6X6 troop carriers, when they went on exercises to Holsworthy, the Perenties were driven with only two troopers in the front and the rest of the unit travelled in buses. Once inside the Holsworthy training area, the troopers disembarked the bus and mounted the troop carriers.

    Yes and no, not sure when it was a blanket decision was made, but in the units I was posted to plenty of troops travelled in the backs of 4x4 and 6x6's between Brisbane and wide bay/shoal water bay.

    I was part of the bushmaster trial, Darwin to Brisbane return leg when I was a chocko, the grunts preferred to travel in the back of the 6x6 over taking their turn in the taipan (driver and section commander has to endure the day)......this was after 1997 so troops were still riding I the back of 6x6's. It would have been earlier for 4x4 and unimogs that troops could ride I the back, maybe when the IIMV's arrived.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bush Animal View Post
    Without creating WW111
    I wouldn't worry about it. WW111 has already been raging for quite some time.
    Unfortunately the most entertaining threads were deleted from various fora quite some time ago. There was a particularly good one on AULRO a few years ago but it got way too silly.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,481
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyG View Post
    Back in the 70's was in the Engineers and we had 6*6 Tippers.
    We also had seats so we could sit inside the tippers.


    Wont even ask about Civvies sitting inside tippers.
    This is possible in S.A., provided that the vehicle was manufactured before the need for seatbelts, and that the seats are an OEM fitting.

    Aaron

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Central Coast NSW
    Posts
    1,103
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Everyone, and that means everyone is covered by WHS legislation - hence no transport in the back of Perenties, Mogs, aircraft etc without the proper seating and harnesses.

    It's a load of dung, but if the organisation leaves itself open to litigation, it's an easy target.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Heart in the Deep Nth of FNQ,Body in the Deep Nth of Brisneyland
    Posts
    1,623
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As to compiance with the respective ADRs at date of manufacture;
    What is more likely- The whole disposal process come to a screeching halt if someone reads 'Old mates' letters on a slow media day/ wants a bigger office OR someone whips out a study on pedestrian safety and retrospectively bans the bonnet protrusions in line with current Light vehicle Modification policy.
    Most juristictions are being reasonable and apply a reasonable and equitable equitable risk assessment process (Probability/ consequences) but there are noted Individuals/ inspection locations that are being unreasonably Bureauocratic about things.
    I'm not scaremongering or drumming up business. Just aware of how fickle policy can be.
    Cheers, BDave.
    Replace "You are...!", with "Are you...?"

    Army Land Rover Buyers Guide.
    buymilitaryvehicles.com

    Reunited with RFSV 51 680, 'Sleazy'!!
    '00 VeryDisco TD5 Auto,
    Nanocom Evo for D2 TD5 and Puma
    Gone:RFSV, 51-699, Carryall 48-358.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by weeds View Post
    Yes and no, not sure when it was a blanket decision was made, but in the units I was posted to plenty of troops travelled in the backs of 4x4 and 6x6's between Brisbane and wide bay/shoal water bay.

    I was part of the bushmaster trial, Darwin to Brisbane return leg when I was a chocko, the grunts preferred to travel in the back of the 6x6 over taking their turn in the taipan (driver and section commander has to endure the day)......this was after 1997 so troops were still riding I the back of 6x6's. It would have been earlier for 4x4 and unimogs that troops could ride I the back, maybe when the IIMV's arrived.
    Of course this could all be related to ComCare we both remember that the Mack NIL trucks had their original rear suspension modified to protect the spines of the troops riding in the back. About the same time as they were all converted to air suspension, the rules were changed and troops were prevented from riding in them.

    It seems that one level of Defence weren't talking to the other.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  7. #27
    MrLandy Guest
    Surely it also comes down to common sense? If you've got sharp protruding potentially lethal weapons bolted all over the outside of your Landy, it would be prudent to remove them, at least when you're driving around the burbs and you're highly unlikely to need them. It's not mad max dudes, there's not going to be an invasion where you need to axe and pick your way out of a 'situation' at a moments notice! seriously? Just take the tools off til you need them. ...And the side facing seats with no seatbelts a thing? Or whatever it is. Hilarious. It's obviously a disaster waiting to happen. It's got nothing to do with regulations and getting around them, it's simply common sense.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MrLandy View Post
    Surely it also comes down to common sense? If you've got sharp protruding potentially lethal weapons bolted all over the outside of your Landy, it would be prudent to remove them, at least when you're driving around the burbs and you're highly unlikely to need them. It's not mad max dudes, there's not going to be an invasion where you need to axe and pick your way out of a 'situation' at a moments notice! seriously? Just take the tools off til you need them. ...And the side facing seats with no seatbelts a thing? Or whatever it is. Hilarious. It's obviously a disaster waiting to happen. It's got nothing to do with regulations and getting around them, it's simply common sense.
    Using that logic, you shouldn't be driving that lethal 4WD around the burbs. Just a fatality waiting to happen. And why do you need a bull bar and winch in the burbs? They're not pedestrian friendly. And what of them sub standard old cars. The old clunkers should be put off the roads.

    I've heard them all before. All absolute rubbish.

    Maybe you should have a read of this:
    Australia nanny state: Have we become a nation of idiots?

  9. #29
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MrLandy View Post
    Surely it also comes down to common sense? If you've got sharp protruding potentially lethal weapons bolted all over the outside of your Landy, it would be prudent to remove them, at least when you're driving around the burbs and you're highly unlikely to need them. It's not mad max dudes, there's not going to be an invasion where you need to axe and pick your way out of a 'situation' at a moments notice! seriously? Just take the tools off til you need them. ...And the side facing seats with no seatbelts a thing? Or whatever it is. Hilarious. It's obviously a disaster waiting to happen. It's got nothing to do with regulations and getting around them, it's simply common sense.
    Why is a pick or shovel a lethal weapon when bolted to a vehicle? You trying to run people over?

    If some dufus steps out in front of my 101 they are going to have a really bad day anyway, the pick and shovel will just add insult to injury.

    Vehicles are inherently dangerous contraptions anyway - lets just ban them all together. Wait, we'd find some other way of killing ourselves....

    Oh, and don't eat bacon or salami - they will kill you too apparently...

    Said it with my last post - we are a nanny country trying to protect ourselves from ourselves. It's about time we took some responsibility for our own actions and went back to 'survival of the fittest'. That way, within a couple of generations we would have weeded out the 'stoopid' gene from our society and we won't need to have these conversations.

    ....then, we can take over the world...... (Insert evil laugh and cat here)
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    All these regulations are about pedestrian safety.

    With the height of a Perentie brush guard top rail, you would have to be travelling very fast or hit an extremely tall pedestrian for them to be thrown onto the bonnet where they could be injured by the gardening tools. Unfortunate as it sounds, with a Perentie Vs pedestrian crash at that speed, the tools would be the least of their worries.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 3 of 10 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!