Thread: Internet Censorship - again

Originally Posted by JDNSW

That is a pretty accurate picture, although to be fair, laying additional cables is almost certainly beyond the resources of any except perhaps the largest ISPs, and even there it is unlikely that any except Telstra would have the capital resources to consider it - and they seem to regard other things as more important.

I can assure you that cable planning is an ongoing thing.

The problem is that there is little money in transporting internet traffic.

Originally Posted by p38arover

I can assure you that cable planning is an ongoing thing.

The problem is that there is little money in transporting internet traffic.

As I said, Telstra has better things to spend money on! As with many areas where Australia is contrasted adversely with overseas countries, it comes down to geography - in this case the distance to the rest of the world compared to the amount of traffic.

John

It has nothing to do with protecting the kiddies and everything to do with exercising control over all of you.

Anyway, attached is an interesting article from a conference I was at last month in San Francisco.

Alan

Originally Posted by disco2hse

It has nothing to do with protecting the kiddies and everything to do with exercising control over all of you.

Anyway, attached is an interesting article from a conference I was at last month in San Francisco.

Alan

Interesting article, nothing new in it though. It does, however, fall into the same error that the politicians seem to have - it regards the internet as a "medium" like television, books, movies etc, whereas in fact it is more akin to Australia Post - and I don't see any move to censor everything that arrives in your mailbox.

John

Originally Posted by JDNSW

Interesting article, nothing new in it though. It does, however, fall into the same error that the politicians seem to have - it regards the internet as a "medium" like television, books, movies etc, whereas in fact it is more akin to Australia Post - and I don't see any move to censor everything that arrives in your mailbox.

John

True, but he does put it together in a more or less coherent form.

About the medium, do you not think that if they could censor your mail they would?

And as it is you do have customs who look for contraband, so in a way there are already searches done on it. Slunnie sent me some stuff and it had been opened in Australia.

Alan

Originally Posted by disco2hse

True, but he does put it together in a more or less coherent form.

About the medium, do you not think that if they could censor your mail they would?

And as it is you do have customs who look for contraband, so in a way there are already searches done on it. Slunnie sent me some stuff and it had been opened in Australia.

Alan

There is a slight difference - they don't open and read your letters (yet) (that I know of!); the internet is information only.

John

Originally Posted by JDNSW

There is a slight difference - they don't open and read your letters (yet) (that I know of!); the internet is information only.

John

Ah yes, but again, if they could censor your mail they would, wouldn't they?

That's one of the things that annoys me about Australia. We just let them do this to us! Aaaargh.

That is one good thing about the US (and I know there are many bad things). If the citizens don't want something done to them by way of restrictions it doesn't happen. They have a constitutional right to freedom where all we seem to have is "privileges" which governments take away at their will. They just try and do it at the start of their term in the knowledge that it will be forgotten by re-election.