Quote:
Originally Posted by
Basil135
It is more to do with legal requirements. By naming a person or business in a forum such as this, you leave yourself & the site admin open for a lawsuit. :nazilock:
It's a pity that this is what it has come to, but the world is changing, and we have to change with it.
I've been a site admin in the past (on a site that has had an history of p*ssing people off) & I've never personally been bothered by the risk of lawsuits. From Defamation in Australia:
Truth (which is also called justification) is probably the best defence. Formerly in some states (such as NSW, Queensland, Tasmania and the ACT) truth was only a defence if you could prove that a ‘public interest’ was served by publishing the defamatory words. This requirement has been dropped from the Uniform Defamation Law and now there is a defence if the defendant can prove that the defamatory imputations are substantially true.
...
To use the defence of honest opinion you do not need to prove the truth of your comment. In some cases this is not possible, especially if it is an opinion rather than a fact. You only need to convince the judge or jury that your comments were your honestly-held opinion ...
Note that other Australian fora have no problems with the name & shame concept ... just do a search for Peter Stevens over on Netrider & you'll see what I mean :twisted:
I think it's important that we can, as a community, speak our minds to our fellow enthusiasts. A timely warning about a dodgy mechanic might literally save lives.