Master
Is it the ECU? Is the 3.5 one much different to the 3.9 one? I'm currently running. 3.9 one on a 1991 3.5, part numbers are different but plug is the same. It runs a lot better than the old one did, although the best fuel consumption I can get is 6.7 k's to the litre or 14.9 litres/100 k's. Is that a bit much? The car has done just over 200k, it feels like it pulls ok but I have nothing to compare it to. I have no idea if the camshaft is worn but going on some comments on ALRO I can expect it to be effecting fuel consumption figures.
Thanks
LordRover
SupporterI cannot answer the question about the ECUs but 14.9 out of a D1 for mixed driving is not bad.
In my old D1 3.9 I got 14.5 cruising along the highway at a steady 100-110kph, 17 around town and 21 in heavy offroad/on the beach.
So your consumption sounds not bad.
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
Master
Thanks Gary, sounds like it's somewhere near it should be.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks