Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: gear ratios

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    51
    Total Downloaded
    0

    gear ratios

    I have a 04 TD5 auto and was wondering if there is a way to lower the ratio in top gear by about 500 rpm to improve fuel economy for highway driving. Cheers

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Arkansas, USA
    Posts
    182
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Are you trying to lower the gears, and raise the RPM or are you trying to lower the RPM?

    You could get 1.003 gears put in the high range of the transfer case to lower the RPM on the highway...

    or you could get 1.410 gears in the high range to raise the RPM.

    See: Ashcroft Transmissions

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    51
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Trying to lower the rpm in top gear. Currently top gear sit at about 2500rpm at 110kph. I want to get that down to around 2000rpm at the same speed..

  4. #4
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Captcav View Post
    Trying to lower the rpm in top gear. Currently top gear sit at about 2500rpm at 110kph. I want to get that down to around 2000rpm at the same speed..
    Based on what logic?

    What RPM range do you think its most efficient at?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    51
    Total Downloaded
    0
    About 2000 - 2200 its at its most effecient, which is eqivulent to 90-100 kph.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    thats more of an areodynamics thing than an engine revs thing.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  7. #7
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Captcav View Post
    About 2000 - 2200 its at its most effecient, which is eqivulent to 90-100 kph.
    Considering the TD5 engine in stock form makes most of its torque at 2400 rpm dropping below that by 400 rpm will result in worse efficiency than stock.

    As Blknight has commented, the vehicle is more efficient at the speeds you listed above due to aerodynamics....

    I had 4.11 gears put in, and for a short while was running wheels too small a diameter for that gear set (was doing about 2900rpm at 110km/h)...
    Fuel use was only 0.2L/100km worse...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,170
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    When I changed from 29" tyres to 33" tyres the fuel economy improved on the highway but it became worst around town. Running at the standard gearing makes the economy a lot more consistent also than with altered gearing.

    This is for a TD5
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,382
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It is based on these arguements I , cash gods willing , would like to see about a six speed gearbox. Probably not economically viable but an interesting idea.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    51
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Considering the TD5 engine in stock form makes most of its torque at 2400 rpm dropping below that by 400 rpm will result in worse efficiency than stock.

    As Blknight has commented, the vehicle is more efficient at the speeds you listed above due to aerodynamics....

    I had 4.11 gears put in, and for a short while was running wheels too small a diameter for that gear set (was doing about 2900rpm at 110km/h)...
    Fuel use was only 0.2L/100km worse...
    I'm not sure this argument has much merit, as a car that produces all its torque at 8500rpm cannot claim that driving it at that level would result in ideal fuel economy. The best fuel economy figures that can be produced with a TD5 are at speeds of 100kph, which in standard tune is 2200rpm. The problem with this is it's 10kph below our national speed limit and would put me 50km behind on my 5hr journey to our holiday destination.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!