I'll see what i can find out, could be a few days .
I'll see what i can find out, could be a few days .
The first part was just my experience with bio diesel in a commercial transport application , personal observation based on conversations with the guys from the work shop. The second part you will notice the word " Apparently ". Nothing to do with internet rumour ,just what i was told by a mate that works for Parks.
No need to get indignant about it.
Merry Christmas to you to mate.
The other way of looking at it is ask a silly question, get a silly answer
There is no merit, empirical evidence or science behind adding 2 stroke oil to diesel. If you want to rely on heresay and non scientific opinion, go for it
But if you do, people like me that believe in science will continue to poke fun![]()
Zzzzzz the conversation has moved on. You are starting to bore me
So finally, have been waiting to see when someone would finally mention what is the actual lubricant in diesel fuel! SULPHUR !!!!
And what is diesel fuel called now? - LOW SULPHUR DIESEL FUEL -
Why? because for those that can remember we used to have super petrol then it became unleaded. Why because lead is supposed to be bad for you. But what did the lead content actually do? It was the the upper cylinder head lubricant for the valves. Remember all the aluminium cylinder heads on cars that the started to have valve recession and then required steel inserts fitted.
Now move forward to the into introduction of low sulphur diesel fuel. Same principal. the sulphur is the lubricant within the fuel. This lubricates all the moving parts within the transfer pumps, fuel pumps, and injectors. But sulphur is supposed to be bad for you as well! so the content of sulphur to a minimum so as when fuel mixture is burnt will expel low emissions. But only provides minimum lubrication.
So by adding 2 stroke oil you are providing the lubrication aspect back into the fuel.
A lot of highway truck engines were suffering injector failures early on when low sulphur fuel was introduced due to the fact that that the sulphur content was so low and not providing adequate lubrication.
Sorry, but you are wrong. This is another myth perpetuated by many people. If you go back a page or 2 and read the journal paper abstract I posted it explains the truth: Lubricity of diesel was found to be adversely affected by the methods used to remove sulphur. However sulphur itself is not a lubricant in diesel.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks