
Originally Posted by
ozscott
Rick your results are aligned with td5 drivers I have spoken to. It really puts into perspective those threads where people ask about petrol v diesel and you get the plethora of diesel owners bagging the v8 economy. Now some other makes diesels are more economical. I had a mate on the Cape York trip with me and his auto NM diesel Triton used 30 per cent less fuel on the 6000k trip than my 4.6. He had a roof road but no lift and stock highway tyres but still it was a lot less fuel usage.
Cheers
When I first got mine we took it from the Dandenongs in Vic to Willunga in SA. Three adults, one big dog, all the associated luggage. No roof rack, no lift in those days, standard size A/Ts. Out through Melbourne, and all the way to the Adelaide hills, where we filled before driving down to Willunga. Exactly 700 Km, exactly 70 litres. The caveat, I filled it to first click at each end, and bowsers can differ, but I thought that was pretty good, travelling at an indicated 105 KM/h, or more when legal. I don't think the 4.0 Ford we have would do any better.
The car is chipped, old school by Ritters. Of course, around where I live it gets nothing like those figures.
JayTee
Nullus Anxietus
Cancer is gender blind.
2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
OKApotamus #74
Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.
Bookmarks