The pdf looks like it's a "by hand" version of an Octave script published to the same forum...
Definitive answer on Key Fob Reprogramming - Land Rover Forums - Land Rover Enthusiast Forum
One of the caveats given along with the barcode generation script is:
A later post on Land Rover Forum suggest you need to replace the final checksum with a ?. The last checksum is for the barcode itself and is a add-on to the Code 39 barcode standard.I still cannot get my Hawkeye to program a used key using my generated codes.
I have a key that used to work, but stopped and has possibly "lost sync." I generated the barcodes using my algorithm and then used the Hawkeye to program those codes, but no luck. Unlike the Nanocom, the Hawkeye does not support a separate "sync key" function that may explain the failure. BearMach (the makers of the Hawkeye) do not claim to be able to program used keys.
Definitive answer on Key Fob Reprogramming - Page 4 - Land Rover Forums - Land Rover Enthusiast Forum
There is a google spreadsheet of the barcode calculator which gives both the full and ?'d versionsOne more note on status. I have reports of success using a Hawkeye, but the codes used were non-standard. They do not conform to the same barcode standard that all of the other reported barcodes do.
The difference is that the check characters are replaced by a '?'. For example, the standard barcodes for inner code 27821d are:
*J28721D27821CFFS*
*FFFFFFFFD87DE25*
The non-standard versions that *may* work using a Hawkeye in this example are:
*J28721D27821CFF?*
*FFFFFFFFD87DE2?*
disco2_fobcode_20130409 - Google Sheets


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks