Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Origin of TD5 engine.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,170
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    As I understood it, the common aspect I think were bore/stroke with the 200/300tdi and the head bolting method from the L series, but thats about it.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  2. #12
    clean32 is offline AULRO Holiday Reward Points Winner!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SA, Newton
    Posts
    2,104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    The TD5 was developed from the L series Freelander engine - basically the L series with an extra cylinder - a lot of the internals are similar but the head design and injection systems are updated. The L series is a first generation electronic diesel (pump controlled but not injectors) and was replaced with the common rail TD4. The L series and TD5 are Rover designed engines (L series used in a range of cars) and have nothing to do with BMW.

    Garry
    almost, a 2ltr 4 2.5ltr 5 and a 3lter 6 cylinder using basically the same components, smart really with only the major parts being different, crank, cam, Head and manifolds.

    As already posted originally the injectors were to be cam operated with an electronically ( Lucas) controlled fuel pump. Quite smart really, still a mechanically controlled common rail injection system with a fuel pump more inline with what we see ( or NZ sees) with the Jap 300 TDI. Then along came BMW, junks all that and replaces it with common rail, hence why the injector harness is run inside the rocker cover and the internal placement of the injectors.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clean32 View Post
    almost, a 2ltr 4 2.5ltr 5 and a 3lter 6 cylinder using basically the same components, smart really with only the major parts being different, crank, cam, Head and manifolds.

    As already posted originally the injectors were to be cam operated with an electronically ( Lucas) controlled fuel pump. Quite smart really, still a mechanically controlled common rail injection system with a fuel pump more inline with what we see ( or NZ sees) with the Jap 300 TDI. Then along came BMW, junks all that and replaces it with common rail, hence why the injector harness is run inside the rocker cover and the internal placement of the injectors.
    But it's not common rail, as BMW/Bosch use, (a simplified system) it's a unit injector setup.

    I believe the story went they (Rover) borrowed or pinched people from either Detroit Diesel (the DD60 Series was the first electronically controlled unit injector setup in the late eighties) or CAT for the unit injector setup.

  4. #14
    crl Guest
    Thank you all for your input. I'm glad to hear that it really is a Land Rover engine after all these years of doubt!

    crl

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,170
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    I think the unit injectors allow much much higher injectin pressures (around 23,000-27,000psi on the TD5???) and those little units are probably also largely responsible for the increased power outputs from diesel engines, especially in comparison to common rail etc.

    I think the TD5 was the first non truck (or heavy) motor to use this technology. Mind you peizo may be the go these days.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  6. #16
    clean32 is offline AULRO Holiday Reward Points Winner!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SA, Newton
    Posts
    2,104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    But it's not common rail, as BMW/Bosch use, (a simplified system) it's a unit injector setup..

    We may be talking the same but with different words.

    Each injector would have been activated by a lobe on the cam and not as it is now by an electrical pulse.

    The high pressure fuel pump would have been electrically controlled as to pressure in the common rail or fuel line to all the injectors. The only controlling required would have been overall pressure as the pulse dwell time was fixed by the cam


    .[/QUOTE]

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The TD5 fuel pump supplies high pressure fuel to the injectors. The extremely high injection pressures are generated inside the actual injector by the inbuilt pressure pump (cam activated). The injector is opened / operated by electronic injector pulse (ECU generated).

  8. #18
    clean32 is offline AULRO Holiday Reward Points Winner!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SA, Newton
    Posts
    2,104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BigJon View Post
    The TD5 fuel pump supplies high pressure fuel to the injectors. The extremely high injection pressures are generated inside the actual injector by the inbuilt pressure pump (cam activated). The injector is opened / operated by electronic injector pulse (ECU generated).

    AHHHH ok got it now, thanks

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,668
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Along the same lines but nothing to do with the TD5.

    Did you know that Rover were prototyping a 5 cylinder petrol engine way back in the 1960's?

    The intent was to repower the P6 car (TC2000 4 cylinder) with 2.5 litre 5 cylinder. The engine under development was similar to the Land Rover 2.283 and Rover 80 car engine but with an added cylinder. There was also a 6 cyl variant under development.



    however the option to use the ex-Buick 3.5 litre V8 came along (thanks to Land Rover of North America) and the rest is history.

    see: The Rover 5 Cylinder story

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!