Thread: WARNING: Nanocom ACE Bug

No worries Madtom & Arragon, most happy to help you as i am with almost any Nanocom owner.

And i will definately be looking into those Key issues you PM'd me about Madtom

It simply seems that for an ACE ECU to report itself as used rather then new, it must have both its "Calibrated" and "Tested" Flags set.
In the function of setting the Tested flag with the Nanocom, the calibrated one is knocked down. Hence the requirement to set the calibrated one afterwards. Therfore this so called "bug warning" is really nothing more than a mis understanding of proceedural requirement.

Interestingly, in our own equipment, we have never provided any such independant and by passing flag setting function.
We simply provide the proper 2 sensor calibration and 5 stage test functionality that seems to automatically set these two flags and thus provides a Used rather than New status.

Fortunately for any owner who is not replacing an ECU for a New one, or an accelerometer sensor, neither function is actually required to be used anyway.

In any event, it will be fixed appropriately in the next upgrade anyway.

I am of course very pleased to have got to the very bottom of this particular aspect, but i have little doubt that other proceedural or functional errors may well exist in the Nanocom software.

It's pretty difficult as the coverage of the Nanocom is in systems and functionality we debugged and got sorted fully near 10 years ago, but non the less I assure all Nanocom owners that we will be doing our very best to track any incorrect functionality down and rectify it as best and as quickly as we can.

Hiya Daryl

Sorry to have offended you, but to the best of my knowledge neither Madtom or Arragagon ever paid me a cent, and if either them or anyone else had just cause to criticise me, i would accept it quite happily and willingly.

I appreciate how my post might seem to you in the lack of further knowledge and understanding, But i assure you I am a decent, fair and honerable chap. My comments were not without due or worthy justification or reason and i only ask you to give me the benefit of doubt in the lack of your fullest understanding.

Warmest Regards

ds23man and circlework.
You have both been infracted for personal attacks on BBSGuy.
Please do not resort to attacking the person in further posts.
Andrew

Originally Posted by LandyAndy

ds23man and circlework.
You have both been infracted for personal attacks on BBSGuy.
Please do not resort to attacking the person in further posts.
Andrew

So you where in the Nanocom Evolution deal????

This is my last post here, moderator's who are deleting links to respected newspapers with public information about convicted criminals should watch the news better, dictatorship will not last long. See the middel East!

I dunno this ones lasted 10 years,,

and it IS a dictatorship.
what the OWNER says, goes.

If you dont like it,, ----------

Originally Posted by ds23man

So you where in the Nanocom Evolution deal????

This is my last post here, moderator's who are deleting links to respected newspapers with public information about convicted criminals should watch the news better, dictatorship will not last long. See the middel East!

No I wasnt in the Evolution deal,more than happy with my Nanocom bought from Rovercraft.
Take your bat and ball and go play eleswhere if you wish.NO LOSS TO US
Andrew

Thanks Andrew

Land Rover Zone springs to mind as a place this person feels at home.

Originally Posted by BBS Guy

Hiya Madtom

It seems the Set tested function in the Nanocom system inadvertently also clears the set calibrated flag, resulting the ECU behaving as a Virgin one.

This will obviously be fixed in the next firmware upgrades.
In the meantime, you simply need to aways to run the two accelerometer calibrations and the set calibrated function after using the Set tested one

Collin. How do I tell if my Nanocom has the latest upgrade?