Thread: Nanocom or ECU????

Mike did my upgrade, so I am fairly confident in what he says.

There are no issues with the car that I can tell, and the only thing that has changed is that i now have the ability to read some of the info.

What is also interesting, is that if I look at the recorded maximums during a trip, I have set a top speed of over 200 km/h, and the temp hit a high of over 170 degrees. Not bad considering the trip was during peak hour, and thru the suburbs...

I recorded the trip home last night, and in over 1700 lines of data, there were two peaks of 136 km/h & 162 km/h. They only lasted for 1 line and are obviously these magical ghost errors. Its more intriguing than annoying - for the moment anyway

Originally Posted by Redback

The issue I see Mike with these ghost faults is how do you determin the ghost faults from the actual faults the car may have.

Baz.

In the coming financial year I am looking to put in place new mapping based on a database of all previous clients vehicles...

Those who need new mapping to clear these ghost faults will get an upgrade done gratis.

I have some issues to work through at my end financially at the moment before I can move forward with my business ventures. Will then be working harder on the tuning side.

Whats even funnier is an un-modified Defender TD5 will show "Can Bus Errors - Automatic transmission"


Driver demand errors are common on all TD5s mapped or stock...
A/C errors and EGR also common...
Injector faults are common...

To log a fault only requires a "blip" in the data, not long and often not noticed either.