The thing is VWs still give fantastic fuel consumption don't they? My daughters Polo gets about 5.5 i think, over 40 mpg.
That's the real world benefit, less fuel consumption means less pollution.
Look at the "combined cycle" urban and highway fuel consumption for most of the modern diesel cars. Its between 5-7.5 l /100 kms. ( 38 to 56 miles per gallon).
Twenty years ago that type of fuel economy was motorcycle country. My estimation is we probably getting 50-60% more miles for every gallon than 20 years ago, a remarkable achievement.
The Americans are indignant but they often drive big pick up trucks with V8 & even V10 engines . If they were really serious about it they would tax cars according to their emmisions. ( guaranteed vote looser)
On the mater of the Australian design rules , its a racket to protect the Australian motor importers and dealers. Are we so arrogant that we think motor maker need to make cars to our rules? There's something special about us? A RHD Mercedes, VW, Pugoet, Toyota needs to be specially modified for us? It's an artificial barrier to free trade in vehicles, that makes our vehicles more expensive.
I had to laugh when i wanted to import my 2001 Vespa PX 200, from Singapore "no can do" doesn't comply with the ADRs.
Like yeh, Piaggio made
5 million of them and sold them in every country in the world, for 40 years, but mine doesn't comply to the ADR.
Same with a RHD Defender, sure landrover make special ones just for Australia.
My Moto guzzi V7 classic astounded the Americans for value, it was in the dealerships for sale at less than 9000 USD. In Australia 14,000 $A, at the time when the aussie dollar was worth more than the USD. How come?
The sooner we adopt a common emission and design rules with other big RHD markets like the UK, Singapore, India, this monopoly can be broken. there'll be no obstical to importing our own vehicles and applying the 10 % GST. Rant over,

simmo
Bookmarks