on the replacement for the perenties

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lambrover

my ASM (boss) told me the G-wagon is not going over seas, so the rover will still be used as the deployed vehicle. So the SASR vehicles will still be playing in the sand pit, can be fixed with wire and leatherman :p. To clear somthing up too, we currently have to many rovers, and wont be replacing all the rovers with G-wagons.

Some one said will they come with computors so the operators can fix them, NO BLOODY WAY do you want operators with computors, you will have experts every where then, I have to fix the problems the operators create, dont need bigger ones.

Drivers are known as zipper heads. (where they pull there brains out)
hope no truckies are on here.:p

---

Computer litracy out there is so poor that most of em wouldn't know how to turn it on.

Merc have been suppling military vehicles long enough I've got little doubt the G-wagon will be pretty well sort although there will be a break in period. If you go to the supercat/nary link it says it is internally loadable to a Chinook. So while people have been lining up all misty eyed for the LRPV's I've seen a reservist 110 1992 built with 8000kms on the clock thinking that might be the go when the auctions start.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by isuzubob

It looks like this might be the replacement for the SAS LRPV. I thought they were going to get some armoured Pommy Bushmaster thing (Ocelot?) but have read that the smaller shape (and radar "footprint") of a Land Rover with no windscreen is still preferable in certain situations.

http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/1...6x6softtop.jpg

More info here:
WOW! in General G-wagen Discussion Forum

---

Not much tech on that link unfortunately. I'm interested in what type of rear suspension design and driveline for the rear bogie.
The poor articulation and under spring ground clearance,plus the short life(around 45,000Km) of the rearmost double Cardan propshaft of the Perentie 6x6s didn't impress me much.
Wagoo.

Its a shame, but land rover can only blame themselves, no one else.

Now our troops have to drive around in the same car as Ms Spears :(

PHP Code:

---

Its a shame, but land rover can only blame themselves, no one else. 


---

I disagree, if the request for supply (or what ever its called) goes out and asks for the supplier to supply a 4x4, a truck that can carry 10 tonnes and a 53 seater bus, Land Rover cant blame them selves, they dont produce those vehicles.

Hay Ewe

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hay Ewe

PHP Code:

---

Its a shame, but land rover can only blame themselves, no one else. 


---

I disagree, if the request for supply (or what ever its called) goes out and asks for the supplier to supply a 4x4, a truck that can carry 10 tonnes and a 53 seater bus, Land Rover cant blame them selves, they dont produce those vehicles.

Hay Ewe

---

I think you would discover that Tata the parent company probably does produce that range of vehicles and a whole lot more.
Wagoo.

At the time of the tender, Land Rover was owned by Ford.

CC

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blknight.aus

something like this

https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/im...11/02/1392.jpg

the civvy version can be seen in britney spears video clip to "you want a piece of me"

---

Do you know how Gay you sound knowing that!!!!! Bahahahaha ;)


( Nothing against people who bat for the other team by the way before the rest try to flame me)

QUOTE=twitchy;1419035]Do you know how Gay you sound knowing that!!!!! Bahahahaha ;)


( Nothing against people who bat for the other team by the way before the rest try to flame me)[/QUOTE]


mate that is so funny, I think dave is in the RAAF as well :Rolling::Rolling::Rolling:. Sorry mate had to go there.

Not that there's anything wrong with that...