Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Just when you thought the C130 was a large A/C to go Fire Hedgehopping.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    507
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Farang View Post
    Yes, there are now aircraft designed just for fire fighting, but mostly twin engine and up. The old Piper Pawnee single engine top dressing/spraying aircraft was used very successfully for many years.

    I believe Col Pay was testing some new type of "scoop", rather than the airframe.
    Yes, that's what I thought. Essentially, Col was using an aircraft without floats and trying a risky technique where the wheels skipped across the surface of the water (like a flat stone, see video) and the attached scoops would fill the tank/s. I think for someone as skilled as Col, it would have been a relatively easy task in benign conditions. However, the technique is very risky for the average pilot. Throw in a bit of chop and the risk far outweighs the benefit. It's so easy for a wheel to dig in (as what happened with Col) and it's game over.
    I couldn't envisage pilots doing such demanding flying to refill after having been on duty for over 10 hours.

    Kevin Quinn World Record Plane Water Ski - YouTube

    The 747 could land at any airport with a suitable pavement (or a pavement concession). Bearing in mind it would normally not have a lot of fuel onboard for fire bombing, so the aircraft would be relatively light compared to if it were doing an international flight. That would reduce the length of runway needed to operate.

    I remember PAXing from Avalon to Tulla in 1992 after the airshow. There were about 50 of us onboard. The captain (Ray Heiniger) made a PA saying he was doing a "max performance takeoff' for the crowd. That involved a higher than usual flap setting and a standing start. We were only on the ground foe a few seconds. I suspect well under 1000m. That was impressive.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Boeing 747 Global SuperTanker at the LNU Lightning Complex fires - YouTube

    They are crazy brave those 747 pilots..
    Regards PhilipA

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills. South Australia
    Posts
    13,349
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Farang View Post
    Yes, there are now aircraft designed just for fire fighting, but mostly twin engine and up. The old Piper Pawnee single engine top dressing/spraying aircraft was used very successfully for many years.

    I believe Col Pay was testing some new type of "scoop", rather than the airframe.

    50th Anniversary of Aerial Firefighting in Australia | Emergency Victoria

    https://safecom-files.s3.amazonaws.c...h%20Australia.


    That is what I read also, but my point about the airframe was that in modifying the Scooper was something else affected?

    Seems Col Pay was a very experienced aviator & would have been very careful when Mods took place, but as you would be aware with your experiences it only takes a small problem to bring down an a/c. He was also flying solo even though the a/c was a DuaL seater & he may have had his hands full when the brown stuff hit the spinny thing.


    But I guess we will never know & it really surprises me when I read Crash Reports just how many prangs remain unsolved/unexplained.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills. South Australia
    Posts
    13,349
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Jars View Post
    Yes, that's what I thought. Essentially, Col was using an aircraft without floats and trying a risky technique where the wheels skipped across the surface of the water (like a flat stone, see video) and the attached scoops would fill the tank/s. I think for someone as skilled as Col, it would have been a relatively easy task in benign conditions. However, the technique is very risky for the average pilot. Throw in a bit of chop and the risk far outweighs the benefit. It's so easy for a wheel to dig in (as what happened with Col) and it's game over.
    I couldn't envisage pilots doing such demanding flying to refill after having been on duty for over 10 hours.

    Kevin Quinn World Record Plane Water Ski - YouTube

    The 747 could land at any airport with a suitable pavement (or a pavement concession). Bearing in mind it would normally not have a lot of fuel onboard for fire bombing, so the aircraft would be relatively light compared to if it were doing an international flight. That would reduce the length of runway needed to operate.

    I remember PAXing from Avalon to Tulla in 1992 after the airshow. There were about 50 of us onboard. The captain (Ray Heiniger) made a PA saying he was doing a "max performance takeoff' for the crowd. That involved a higher than usual flap setting and a standing start. We were only on the ground foe a few seconds. I suspect well under 1000m. That was impressive.

    Thanks John, it is always good to read your informed comments you being "in the trade" so to speak.I


    I hope you are now getting more hours up of late.




    Your "max performance takeoff" reminded me of our Cathay 747 flight out of Kai Tak to Aust. in about 1980.


    Heavy storm brewing & the Capt wanted to get moving asap. We sat on the thresh-hold, brakes on, 4 engines screaming their nuts off when the brakes were released. Suddenly we found ourselves going into orbit & out over the Harbour & away. From memory I seem to recall the A/C being parked as far back as possible on the Landward end which would have given him maybe a 100' extra length.

    He did have the courtesy to explain what he was going to do so that made it a bit easier & it certainly was exhilarating.

    All in a Day's work for him I reckon.


    Then they built the new airport & took all the fun out of it.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!