Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Helicopter ground resonance

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wannanup WA
    Posts
    1,477
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Helicopter ground resonance

    Slow news day. This phenomena only occurs in helicopters with fully articulated rotor systems, and more often those with 3 main rotor blades.
    In small helicopters, such as the Hughes 300 shown here, the onset is very rapid and requires instant response from the pilot.

    As an aside: the comments mention the oleo struts in this case MAY have contributed to the event. During my training I did some time on these particular machines (I do NOT like them). With an instructor on board one day approaching to land he noticed that one landing skid was hanging down lower than the other. The bloody oleos on one side had slipped apart, a bit like a car shocker that has a screwed in end cap on it, allowing the skid to hang down. After some discussion it was decided that ONE of us would have to get out and try and put the offending strut(s) back in place!
    As he was the better pilot, guess who drew the short straw! So while he kept the helicopter in a steady hover out I went and managed to put the bloody thing back in place, and he landed without a problem! I dread to think what may have happened if he had not noticed the skid hanging low.




  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    15,795
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Farang View Post
    In small helicopters, such as the Hughes 300 shown here, the onset is very rapid and requires instant response from the pilot.
    I believe my instant response would be not to get in the damn thing in the first place. I have seen similar footage before, but had no idea that it was caused by engineering seeking a problem rather than a solution.
    OF, do such birds require separate endorsement? Seems to me that a higher level of training would be required.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    ​Getting involved in discussions is the best way to learn.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wannanup WA
    Posts
    1,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins View Post
    I believe my instant response would be not to get in the damn thing in the first place. I have seen similar footage before, but had no idea that it was caused by engineering seeking a problem rather than a solution.
    OF, do such birds require separate endorsement? Seems to me that a higher level of training would be required.
    had no idea that it was caused by engineering seeking a problem rather than a solution.
    Ah, rather the other way around. The problem is induced by the pilot (mostly), the C of G of the rotating mass gets displaced and the engineering attempts to rectify it.

    do such birds require separate endorsement? Seems to me that a higher level of training would be required.
    All helicopters require an individual endorsement, as compared with group endorsements for fixed wings. Ground resonance is covered in theory studies, but as you cannot demonstrate it, even in an incipient stage, some folks just don't get it!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    507
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Wouldn't have liked to be sitting in the back of the CH-47 when the rear mast came off. I think that one was flight testing/demonstrating ground resonance, wasn't it?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wannanup WA
    Posts
    1,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Jars View Post
    Wouldn't have liked to be sitting in the back of the CH-47 when the rear mast came off. I think that one was flight testing/demonstrating ground resonance, wasn't it?
    Yeah, not sure just what they are up to there, John. After all, they are probably Americans! What I first thought were test monitoring lines running off, a closer look at the lines show they may just be tether lines to prevent it flying off into the ether by itself.

    But I do think it was some type of testing, and I doubt that anyone was on board.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    15,795
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh Jars View Post
    Wouldn't have liked to be sitting in the back of the CH-47 when the rear mast came off. I think that one was flight testing/demonstrating ground resonance, wasn't it?
    Had a couple of rides in a Chook back in the day. Didn't know a thing or I might have risked being disciplined for disobeying a lawful command.... I was silly enough to ask the crew about its auto rotational capabilities. Got told that the "****er has all the auto rotational capability of a housebrick". I look back in horror...
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    ​Getting involved in discussions is the best way to learn.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wannanup WA
    Posts
    1,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins View Post
    Had a couple of rides in a Chook back in the day. Didn't know a thing or I might have risked being disciplined for disobeying a lawful command.... I was silly enough to ask the crew about its auto rotational capabilities. Got told that the "****er has all the auto rotational capability of a housebrick". I look back in horror...
    They were just rattling your chain mate!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    507
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins View Post
    Had a couple of rides in a Chook back in the day. Didn't know a thing or I might have risked being disciplined for disobeying a lawful command.... I was silly enough to ask the crew about its auto rotational capabilities. Got told that the "****er has all the auto rotational capability of a housebrick". I look back in horror...
    I went for a ride in a Huey when on a promotion course in Amberley with the ATC cadets, way back when. The loadmaster sat me at the left door gunner position, which had the best view in the house.

    I was lucky and had a helmet and headset on, and could hear the crew talking over the intercom. We spent most of the flight chasing roos at treetop level. When the captain announced his intent to do a practice autorotation, I had no idea

    When the engine spooled down I got the idea. My life flashed before my eyes, but of course the manoeuvre was well executed.
    It was one of my most memorable flights as a sprog in a Service aircraft
    Sadly, the crew were lost in a prang a few months later. I was shocked to read it in the RAAF News.

    John R.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Wannanup WA
    Posts
    1,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have flown a Huey (while working offshore), but I am not endorsed on them. Auto rotations (successful ones!), depend a lot on the inertia in the rotor system. It is said of the Huey that there is enough inertia in the rotor system that; if sitting on the ground at flight idle you cut the engine it is possible to lift off the ground and turn a full circle and land again without damage.

    The first helicopter that I owned was a Robinson R22. A very low serial number and one of the first imported into Australia.
    Now that DID auto like a brick! It had about as much inertia as a paper bag. So much so that one of the first mods carried out by the factory was to install weights in the tips of the main rotor blades. (from Serial number 200 on if I recall correctly).

    That did improve it, but it was still a delicate manoeuvre! It was also very easy to overspeed the rotor system, so it took a LOT of practice to become proficient.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    15,795
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Farang View Post
    I have flown a Huey (while working offshore), but I am not endorsed on them. Auto rotations (successful ones!), depend a lot on the inertia in the rotor system. It is said of the Huey that there is enough inertia in the rotor system that; if sitting on the ground at flight idle you cut the engine it is possible to lift off the ground and turn a full circle and land again without damage.
    With a rotor diameter of nearly 15 metres there would be a fair bit of inertia...
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    ​Getting involved in discussions is the best way to learn.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!