I've got a D3 and a BA Falcon. I see the same trends when both are serviced. Apprentices do most of the work with little or no supervision and they are "guided" by diagnostic procedures that work 80% of the time. Due to the nature of the diagnostic procedures they do not think about the fault and what may be causing it, rather they concentrate on the test and it's results.
I had what I thought was a compressor failure on the D3 over the weekend, the supply fuse was blown and the vehicle was logging a suspension fault.
My repair strategy would have been to replace the compressor first and ask questions later.
The dealer needed to apply 3 firmware updates that had an effect on compressor behaviour first. Then they put in a new compressor and found the fuse had blown. replaced the fuse and all was well. Swapped the old compressor and found that the fault was actually caused by bad connections on the plug connecting the compressor. Refitted the old compressor and all is working (at the moment).
My service strategy would have fixed the fault but at considerably more expense.
Their strategy took longer and inconvenienced the customer more but was a better financial result for LR.
What service organisations need to do is better communicate and staff appropriately so that they can perform these procedures without inconveniencing their customers and stopping them complaining.
I dont think that we are going to stop the "dumbing down " of the service force as this is a strategy seen across the computer industry as well where multinational companies do not invest in their workforce and figure that if they can employ a service person for $5 less and hour by reducing their training and quals they will.
/rant off
Regards,
Tote
Go home, your igloo is on fire....
2014 Chile Red L494 RRS Autobiography Supercharged
MY2016 Aintree Green Defender 130 Cab Chassis
1957 Series 1 107 ute - In pieces
1974 F250 Highboy - Very rusty project
Assorted Falcons and Jeeps.....
Bookmarks