Just another side to the same story.
Cattle are currently selling for around $2.30 / kg. Based on a 600kg cow, that is a cost of $1380 paid to the farmer.
By the time it is transported etc, and ends up in the shop, the cost to the consumer is, on average, somewhere around $10 kg. (Taken over all useable product).
This means that if you were to buy a whole (useable portion) cow at the supermarket, it would cost you $6,000, or 430% mark-up.
Now, while there are a number of people involved in getting that cow from the farm gate to the bbq, that sort of mark-up is just plain crazy.
IMO, the biggest factor in this scenario is transport costs. There would be 3 or 4 separate trips required to deliver it to you. But someone is making an absolute fortune out of this, and it isn't the guy in the floppy hat that gets up at dawn, and relies on Mother Nature to be able to survive.
Ask any farmer if he would be happy to accept another 50% for supplying the raw product, and just wait for the stampede to your door.
The same formulation can be applied to most other products. The point is, if a product is manufactured, (grown, built etc) in Australia, then the laws of reasoning dictate that that product should be cheaper here.
We should not have to pay more for a product that is Australian made. Especially when that same product can be bought over seas for much less than we can get it for.
I think the major problem with all of this, is that a very small amount of people are making the majority of the money, and that is not filtering down to the people that are doing the work. If net profits were reduced by 1% across the board, and those funds distributed amongst the workers, and reflected in the shelf price, then most of this argument would be solved.
I accept that there are economies of scale, but price gouging Joe Public has become an acceptable past-time for many major companies.

