I understand that the accused is pleading not guilty. So, you would have to assume that he has given nothing away and that there was another person involved who is being offered some sort of immunity or a plea bargain in exchange for being the star witness. Because of the specific and tiny search area, I also suspect this 'witness' was present at the time the body was placed in this location and that the information was not just based on the accused discussing the crime with someone. This confirmation that it was Daniel's remains would have to hugely increase the value of this 'witness' to the prosecution's case.

