Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 81

Thread: Inappropriate or Pointless Land Rover Modifications...

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    653
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Yes you will be. I guess you've never had to be back to 2nd gear to get up a hill on the highway with a Rover 6 that a Holden engine would go up in top. I guess you've never had to change burned valves in a Rover 6 or had to pay the cost of reconditioning a Rover engine. On second thought a Holden Engine in a Land Rover is about as pointless as an Isuzu engine in a Land Rover.
    LOL! Must have been a hell a surprise finding that an old Land Rover was a bit underpowered. As for burned valves and reconditioning, I would say it's all about doing your homework. And tragic as it may be, sometimes cars break down and they cost money to fix. Isuzu engines? Weren't they fitted by Land Rover at the big building they called a factory?

    If you want a high performance 4x4, get something like Lamborghini LM002. If you want a cheap one, get a Lada. If you're a Land Rover enthusiast, suck it up and buy a Land Rover.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeJay View Post
    The guy I bought it off had the vehicle totally refurbed, he was a truckie & it even had ( I got rid of it) a pyrometer, so add that to the useless list as it's a petrol Chev.
    The holes were where he had 3 fuel guages. He had 3 fuel tanks, 3 guages & 3 pumps - no kidding..but sold them off prior to me getting it, & yes, all work.

    Another pic of the dash- as some on here were interested

    The 3 fuel tanks intrigue me, I assume two were set up as auxiliary tanks feeding to the main? If you don't mind, how much fuel would he have had all up? Fascinating, Bob
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  3. #43
    Tombie Guest
    Bunch of snobby old snots some of you lot

    In my opinion what you drive is the same as what is expressed on the Motorcycle and Tattoo forums I'm in..

    It may not be others taste - but it doesnt have to be... Its got to suit YOUR tastes...

    I dont agree with a lot of mods, but it is the owners choice to fit them and thats fine - To me, as long as they are safe - Wont endanger my family or friends etc... Then go for it....

    I may laugh at "unusual" modifications, but they have the right to do so!

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, Sunshine Coast, Gladstone, QLD
    Posts
    1,351
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bob10 View Post
    The 3 fuel tanks intrigue me, I assume two were set up as auxiliary tanks feeding to the main? If you don't mind, how much fuel would he have had all up? Fascinating, Bob
    Not to sure how these tanks where set up but a mate of mine had a similar setup in his GQ Patrol. 180 litres or so and each tank worked independantly of each other. Flick a switch on the dash and his factory fuel gauge would read the other tank instead and pump fuel from that tank etc.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sometimes ''different'' mods actually work well and I like people who think outside the square.I bought my X-Tech just because it's different,it stands out from all the white Prado's we have here and seriously I can't drive the thing anywhere without people asking me about it,twice people have knocked on my door to have a chat and I let a bloke take it for a drive last saturday.I can't wait for all the bits to arrive from England that I've ordered as it'll look cool fitted out. Pat

  6. #46
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CJT View Post
    Not to sure how these tanks where set up but a mate of mine had a similar setup in his GQ Patrol. 180 litres or so and each tank worked independantly of each other. Flick a switch on the dash and his factory fuel gauge would read the other tank instead and pump fuel from that tank etc.
    I'm getting a sill tank made up for my puma that fills from the lower guard and then will fill the main through a transfer pump with a water trap and filter,dirty fuel is my only worry with the TDCi. Pat

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,665
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    It all depends upon the fuel system, the old systems had a single line that went from the tank, through a filter and pump and into the carby. These systems auxiliary tanks were merely switched over with a mechanical fuel switch and if fitted a fuel tank guage switched over with a separate switch on the dash. (SIIa Army are a classic example of these.) More advanced systems had the fuel guage switch in the change over switch. With electric fuel pumps, each tank usually had it's own pump into a manifold connection in a common fuel line. Whichever pump you had running supplied fuel to the engine.

    In the full flow systems usually those with injectors fuel is constantly circulating and returning to the tank. Switching both the supply and return lines is more complicated and the simple solution is to have transfer pumps to move the fuel into the main tank from the aux tank. The problem with these systems is when the main fuel pump fails or you hole the main tank, you are immobilised, even though you still have a functional tank and transfer pump.

    So is fitting additional tanks innappropriate and is fitting transfer pumps innappropriate. I hardly think so.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brisbane, Sunshine Coast, Gladstone, QLD
    Posts
    1,351
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That is exactly how my mates patrol was set up and it was running fuel injection on a GM 5.7litre V8 from a Commodore.

    I am not sure of the details, however I remember the mechanic joking it had to be built by NASA...due to how complicated it was.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    It all depends upon the fuel system, the old systems had a single line that went from the tank, through a filter and pump and into the carby. These systems auxiliary tanks were merely switched over with a mechanical fuel switch and if fitted a fuel tank guage switched over with a separate switch on the dash. (SIIa Army are a classic example of these.) More advanced systems had the fuel guage switch in the change over switch. With electric fuel pumps, each tank usually had it's own pump into a manifold connection in a common fuel line. Whichever pump you had running supplied fuel to the engine.
    Last edited by CJT; 12th October 2011 at 02:56 PM. Reason: Edit

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    How about 38.5" Tyres on a 101?

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,665
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Sleepy View Post
    How about 38.5" Tyres on a 101?
    Given that the OEM fitted Michelin 255/100 R16 XZL were 36.38" (923mm) an aprox 2.16" increase hardly seems worth mentioning!

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 5 of 9 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!