I don't have any issue with pricing/taxing carbon/polluting technologies to drive demand for cleaner alternatives.
I do have a problem with the way the money collected is circulated.
No good taxing 'the big polluters' then giving allmost all of the money back to those controlling the actual consumption (that's you and me), so they can afford the increased charges.
First rule is: reduce consumption within your control.
So don't turn it on unless you actually need it, turn it off, turn it down, use it less where possible and appropriate.
Second rule is: make it better.
Replace inefficient or dirty technology with improved versions/alternative as appropriate and when available/affordable.
Follow these rules at an individual level and this has a much bigger (positive) impact than a handful of tax dollars doing the rounds.
Third rule: Private business won't do it unless there is money in it for them.
So governments around the world must invest directly in R&D and pilot schemes for cleaner or more efficient technologies.
This is where the taxes collected must go.
Sometimes life does need to be tough.
Back in my day.....walked 6 miles.....rant....rant...hobby horse......soapbox etc.......



Reply With Quote



Let alone the crippling to the aussie manufacturing and steel industry.
Bookmarks