Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Something other than R380?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,229
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB

    Something other than R380?

    I'm not sure if this is the right place for this, so feel free to move it.
    Does anyone know of a relatively simple, reasonably priced conversion to replace the R380 gearbox in a 300TDi Disco? The 380 is a nice box to use, but I've never come across a manual box so subject to complete, unexpected, failure. It's time to move on.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by johntins View Post
    I'm not sure if this is the right place for this, so feel free to move it.
    Does anyone know of a relatively simple, reasonably priced conversion to replace the R380 gearbox in a 300TDi Disco? The 380 is a nice box to use, but I've never come across a manual box so subject to complete, unexpected, failure. It's time to move on.
    The suffix K or L box is easily strong enough and give very few problems, I'm guessing yours is 1994 to 1997 then? Suffix J were pretty average in the performance and reliability department. There is no other easily adaptable trans avialable that I know of, so start looking for a box from a 1998/9 D1 Tdi, or order one from Ashcrofts in UK, they will build one in Suffix L spec for you.

    JC

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quaife in the UK are about to release a six speed sequential shift dog 'box to replace the R380, but I'd reckon you'd need a pretty good $$$$$ limit on your credit card to acquire one

    [edit]It's been released, 8950.00 quid http://www.quaife.co.uk/shop/products/qbe86g

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    R380's are prone to sudden failure just like any other manual box,thats the way it is.I also don't think the problem is as dramatic as you put it as many R380's are doing fine at big K's,I'd get an Ashcroft built box and forget about it. Pat

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The new Gold Coast, after ocean rises,Queensland
    Posts
    13,204
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think if you just get it rebuilt with new hi quality bearings and seals itll be as good as new for a long time

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yup, Like Pat says, I have seen many in the 400,000km bracket, and some fail at 100K, change the oil at regular intervals, don't try and put 400Hp through it and use a Suffix K or L and you should be fine for ages.

    What is the history of yours?

    JC

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    3,536
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by justinc View Post
    Yup, Like Pat says, I have seen many in the 400,000km bracket, and some fail at 100K, change the oil at regular intervals, don't try and put 400Hp through it and use a Suffix K or L and you should be fine for ages.

    What is the history of yours?

    JC
    Don't want to change the direction of the thread but how do you find ZF4P22's around 97/98 fare? (Well technically that is "something other than R380"... so on topic).

    Mine is regularly serviced with Transmax Z and has been pressure tested and I'm told its as good as the day it was made. But at nearly 300 grand I think it might be time to start a rebuild money jar

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by B92 8NW View Post
    Don't want to change the direction of the thread but how do you find ZF4P22's around 97/98 fare? (Well technically that is "something other than R380"... so on topic).

    Mine is regularly serviced with Transmax Z and has been pressure tested and I'm told its as good as the day it was made. But at nearly 300 grand I think it might be time to start a rebuild money jar
    A piece of string question, is it behind a Tdi or V8? If a V8 they tend to last longer strangely enough if driven sensibly, when they fail it is usually sprag or TC . The Tdi version suffers a lot more from heat, and the fact that the smaller TC is very light duty in the lock up clutch etc etc.

    I have seen many V8 ones at over 300K, but lots of Tdi ones fail at 200 to 250K.

    Best ones IMO were 1998/9 versions of both V8 and Tdi, they seem to have upped the line pressures and shift quality etc they are noticeably crisper to drive.

    JC

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    under a rock, next to a tree, at Broadmarsh
    Posts
    6,738
    Total Downloaded
    0

    J to L

    Quote Originally Posted by justinc View Post
    The suffix K or L box is easily strong enough and give very few problems, I'm guessing yours is 1994 to 1997 then? Suffix J were pretty average in the performance and reliability department. There is no other easily adaptable trans avialable that I know of, so start looking for a box from a 1998/9 D1 Tdi, or order one from Ashcrofts in UK, they will build one in Suffix L spec for you. JC
    Hi JC

    What is required to upgrade a R380 J to a K or L suffix ?
    Besides a load of Martin Cash !
    Can a J suffix case, be used in doing the upgrade?

    Cheers Arthur

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wrinklearthur View Post
    Hi JC

    What is required to upgrade a R380 J to a K or L suffix ?
    Besides a load of Martin Cash !
    Can a J suffix case, be used in doing the upgrade?

    Cheers Arthur
    From what Dave and Ian Ashcroft have said in the past, a new box Arthur

    I started to write something but found this in another thread....

    This suffix J did unfortunately have a couple of design flaws which gave the R 380 some bad press, they were prone to the mainshaft shearing across the oil feed holes, the layshaft also sheared at a stress concentration behind the sandwich plate causing loss of 5th and reverse also early ones still suffered from mainshaft wear until the cross drilled transfer case gears became fitted as standard on the suffix G transfer cases.
    In 1999 the suffix K was used very briefly for a few months then came the suffix L. The K and L are virtually identical, the only difference I have found is the L outer main casing has an additional strengthening rib, internals are the same. The J and K/L are very different, 2 of the bearings were substantially uprated and pinion and layshaft teeth were widened again, this results in a much stronger unit.
    From here R380 Layshaft failure
    So I'd infer from that they are substantially another box.

    Dave posted recently that they are looking at modifying/upgrading a few of the bearings (bigger) again in the R380 to make it a bit more reliable.
    [edit] here http://www.aulro.com/afvb/1487155-post45.html from this thread R380 5th gear

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!