My niece and her husband have just put one of their farms (next door to me, in fact) on the market - he had, over the years, worked to get three farms, having three sons. The oldest, with an agriculture degree, is well into a career aas an agronomist, and is unlikely to go back to farming - his present job (with an agricultural supplier) pays better and is a lot less risky, and shorter hours. The second son is engaged to a lawter who does not want to leave Sydney, and the third one has just married a vet in Geraldton.
I suspect this is a typical story.
It is not just farmers either - the median age of rural doctors is, I believe, even higher. In my own profession (geophysics) I suspect the median age is well over sixty, and the same will apply to many technical professions where technology advances and industry consolidation over the last thirty years has meant few jobs for new entrants to the profession.
Our society has, over the last thirty or forty years, consistently shown that it values non-technical professions and jobs more highly than the technical ones. There are a few exceptions to this, particularly in IT, but I think it is generally true. Similarly, we apparently value non productive occupations such as sports, law, banking, politics, shuffling red tape, entertainment, much more highly than productive ones such as engineering, manufacturing, mining, agriculture, research, medicine.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Bookmarks