In the days when "real" maths was taught in school:angel::wasntme:, we learned in yr 8 ("Form 2" as it was called in those days) that as a rough approximation, the distance to the horizon in nautical miles was 1.2 x the square root of your height above the water measured in feet.... thispost reminded me that this was one of those days I actually paid attention:eek::D
so say 2m approximates to 6 feet, and the square root of 6 is 2.5, thus 2.5 x 1.2 = 3 nautical miles which multiplied by 1.8 to convert to km = approx 5.4 km
just goes to show you can learn something useful on this forum every day!! So as Billy Connelly would say...stay awake and pay attention;)
the issue of refraction and total internal reflection is really interesting because due to atmospheric conditions, light is actually internally reflected off upper layer. This phenomenon is most evident travelling the Hay plains west of Narranderah at night... while cruising at 120kmh one night some 30 yrs ago I dipped the lights for oncoming traffic: it took 10 minutes before the traffic passed. Assuming they were cruising at similar speeds, that was a closing speed of 240kmh or 4km /min...thus 40km separation at first sighting. It was a coolish night and I'm assuming the lights were being reflected and refracted between narrow layers of air/water vapour...amazing!

