As long as laws are made by politicians (driven by faceless bureaucrats?) we will have lots of stupid ones...
But, when the interpretation of said stupidity, is 'assumed' by the same conflicted Interested Party and not challenged by the public and/or the judiciary... then we have a real problem. Or worse still, legislation is framed in such a way to make sensible remedies 'impossible'... (Dullbird's change of plasitc)
In this case Martin Luther King's comment regarding civil liberty etc bears some relevance.
“One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.”
Taking the situation that dullbird found himself in... The Law permitted and endorsed his behaviour...then condemned it when he would have been better aquainted with our driving conditions...and therefore a SAFER driver.
How silly is the drafting and enforcement of a Law.... that prevents and penalises the observance of it's 'intent'
No wonder the Law and its agents are held in disrespect!

