Never-mind guys, joke has passed and I don't expect anyone to commute on gravel roads on vibrating rollers.
But they certainly will flatten them. No-one claimed remove them.
Printable View
Correct practice (not always observed) in compacting fill is to build up in lifts of no more than about 12"/300 mm. Adequate compaction, usually expressed as 94 ASHO, is difficult to achieve in deeper lifts than 12". If soil tests show inadequate compaction the only solution is to remove the fill down to where it is adequately compacted and put it back again properly this time. Worst scenario is that once practiced in real estate "developments" on the Gold Coast. Ti-tree and paperbark swamps were pushed over and sand pumped in to create land above water level. These were given minimum compaction or just left to settle. When building applications were made sometimes years later the soil tests showed the land as unsuitable for foundations and permission was refused. Much of the pushed over vegetation had not rotted down and attempts to compact using vibratory rollers failed miserably. It was like trying to compact an inner spring mattress. The solution was to rip out the fill, dump the vegetation elsewhere, put the fill back in lifts and compact properly. This would probably cost more than the land was then worth.
Sorry guys, as I said previously, corrugations are a surface defect mainly due to use of poorly-binding basecourse materials. The corrugations do not reflect or form at depth. If you make a longitudinal trench in a corrugated road, you will not see corrugations on the bottom of the pavements layers or deeper. If you do see evidence of material displacement, you have a soft subgrade issue and this is a pavement failure, not corrugations forming at depth.
Compaction by roller is only effective at shallow depths (300-500mm max.), the deeper depths by using some serious deadweight machinery or huge vibration, which is generally not good for community relations :D....
Could this be the answer to corrugated roads :D
https://www.aulro.com/afvb/images/im...014/05/726.jpg
Oh woody alert
Imagine going through the bottle shop in that
No expert here but just having a guess.
While it make sense that a roller won't have a effective compaction at anything over shallow depths. I would think that years of continual compaction from heavy vehicle could go much deeper.
I'm not saying they form below the surface but once formed in the surface the compaction from the corrugations can run deep.
Once the material is compacted in waves below the surface, no amount of surface grading is going to take that away and once the surface is graded the corrugations may form faster from the deeper compaction. Even if the road was cut back, filled and compacted 300 - 500mm, if the corrugation compaction runs deeper than that, they will form again faster than vigin ground.
Happy Days.
Someone mentioned the Anne Beadell has some of the worst corrugations anywhere. I have never been there, but lets accept that if we can.
This would be very low traffic since the 70's ?, so why corrugated? OR are they preserved since a burst of heavy traffic in the 50's and 60's ?
The worst corrugations I ever see are on skifield roads. Particularly on the inside of the switchback corners.
Loose surface, low traction, reasonably steep and most vehicles get some axle tramp in those conditions. You should see the Prado's wallowing.:D
Heaviest vehicles on these roads are buses at maybe 11 ton a piece. 200mm deep corrugations are common.