Thread: I don't have much sympathy for this bloke

well the victim didn't say no.

Originally Posted by Eevo

well the victim didn't say no.

Unless she spoke in her sleep, she was rather unlikely to.

Go on, have another go, see if you can drag it down a little further.

MAY HE ROT IN HELL

Originally Posted by Eevo

well the victim didn't say no.

I guess (and hope) that you said that in the context of what a bastard solicitor can put as argument of a very sick act.

Originally Posted by Chucaro

I guess (and hope) that you said that in the context of what a bastard solicitor can put as argument of a very sick act.

from watching law and order SVU, the victim must say no.

Originally Posted by Eevo

from watching law and order SVU, the victim must say no.

Are you serious?
You really think that is a theme were we can joke about it?
Please explain.

thats sick if a person must say no. that means men can legally rape us women in our sleep because we dont say no, even though they are violating our bodies!!!!!!!!!! men cover mouths so you cannot speak or make a sound or even open your mouth!!!!!! it cant be true that in not saying no, that its then not classed as rape!!!!!!!!!! it still is! and i hope that low life does not go after her for damages! what he did to her was far worse! i just hope he doesnt get away with it and go rape other women and not only ruin their lives, but also give them a disease that ruins their lives even more!!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by Epic_Dragon

thats sick if a person must say no.

i agree thats its sick. to make sure there is no doubt that a female is not consenting is for her to say no.

lawyers can easily argue if she doesnt say no, then she was consenting and enjoying it.
lawyer: why didnt she say no? maybe cause she was enjoying it?


in the article link given, we're assuming that lack of consent