Printable View
Hi Baz,
Why not join this forum and have a look around before jumping in at the deep end ;) Very friendly and helpful bunch ( bit like here ) and you could even find somebody local to you who will advise and let you listen to their systems
StereoNET Australia
Source,control and playback are the three major elements in every system.
I used to be a deranged audiophile but then found land rovers :D
Baz,
If you can deal with a fairly minimal feature set its worth taking a look at the NAD T748 amp. They sell for around $700 but the emphasis has been put on sound quality. The T748 is rated at 40w per channel but this is measured with all channels driven and at 0.08% Thd so in reality it's more powerful than the onkyo for example.
You'd have to sure you could live with trading off the bells and whistles for audio performance.
http://nadelectronics.com/products/a...Sound-Receiver
Cheers
Paul
OK it's funny what you persevere as good quality or high end when shopping around, our current unit is a RX-V492 and is the same price it was 25yrs ago and is identical right down to the remote:D
But this was what I've been looking at:ohyes:
just brousing the HiFi Trader
Yamaha RX-A1030 A/V Receiver
.
Baz.
Sounds like you are a bit of a Yamaha fan ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Redback
I'm biased towards the NAD gear as I've owned their gear over the past 30 years, and like what they do, so can understand the loyalty factor involved.
If you are playing in the $1500 price bracket you should at least have a look/listen at the NAD T-757.
It's had very good reviews and I don't think you'd be disappointed with the sound or picture quality.
There is a pretty comprehensive review here: NAD T757 7.1 A/V Receiver - Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity
cheers
Paul
X2 on the NAD gear, just had to sell my 317 and 3x 214's:(
Beautiful amps.
X3 on the NAD gear, I'm running an old 3020i from the 80's through a pair of similar age Jensen 100w speakers and love the sound.
Barry,
Have a chat to Caringbah Hi-Fi in Port Hacking road. They used to be good - have been around as specialist for better than 30 years.
Martyn
Anyone remember when SONAB amps. were one of the boutique lines.
Mine is still alive and kicking through a pair of Polk Audio speakers also bought in the 70's. Still sounds awesome.
No RCA sockets on this baby, all 5 pin DIN sockets.
Redback, if you like your current sound , clean out the pots and replace a few capacitors and just think of all the extra dollars to spend on new CD's.
Cheers Peter.
You seem to be stuck on Yamaha but you should consider others. I had a Yamaha RX-V490 and it had the worst reciever I have ever had. The signal was weak and dropped out all the time, I turn my radio on in the morning and leave it on all day, but the 490 was so pathetic I used to play cds all day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Redback
When I moved out here to the sticks I even resorted to putting up an external antenna and the signal would still drop out. I had the unit looked at by a couple of quality stereo shops but they said this was typical Yamaha.
I then bought the Harmon/Karndan for around the same price as the new Yamaha and the radio works even without the external antenna and has never dropped out.
So it depends how you use your stereo what you will need, but I will never own another Yamaha.
If they have home shows or similar where you are, go and check out some of the stereo stands or go to shops with room where you can compare amps/receivers with the same speakers and cd players.
Hope this helps
Neale
Never had any issues with mine in all the years I have had it, it's been brilliant.Quote:
Originally Posted by Corgie Carrier
I'm only brousing at the moment, I will be going out and looking at other Amps.
Baz.