Civil Liberties caused all this kerfuffle.
Btw, let's be clear, only non criminals care about civils liberties or play by the rules.
Eg. One OMCC can specifically target members and family of another. No reference to civil liberties at all.
However, the law and the overwhelming populace are restricted by civil liberties and rules. In effect fighting with one arm tied behind their back. Our laws and constitution prohibit (generally) targetting a specific group.
At the risk of being flamed mercilessly, how long would organisations such as OMCC, Mafia, Crips, Bloods etc last if the non criminal populace was allowed and encouraged to apply the same standard of play to them?
At the risk if enraging Chukka, some of the methods used by administrations and regimes throughout history worked! They may be immoral by our current western standards, but maybe it is time to fight fire with fire? I am sure Chukka could talk at length about the Argentinian phenomenom of 'disappearing'. The mafia perfected 'cement boots'. North Korea and China(?) use 're-education camps'.
I pose the question? How would OMCC membership progress if some of these methods were allowed to be used by the law? My bet is membership would fall.
Many of us here know Chopper Read is now dead. Just as many think he deserved it. But almost as many quietly or tacitly accepted or approved that he took out other crims!
Flame away!
Ralph


Reply With Quote




Bookmarks