Rather difficult for the majority of people watching that show when some so called 'experts' in the fields turn out to have mail order qualifications (PhD) in the field they claim expertise in.
How are people supposed to know what is of value or not when this is done without disclosure by Catalyst.
By doing a research in the same way that Media Watch have done it.
I am not who is going to assume that people cannot do that, it will be an arrogant view.
12th November 2013, 05:55 PM
Chucaro
Quote:
Originally Posted by isuzurover
I am not so sure... There are plenty of "true believers" out there who only see what they want... (just look at the vaccination thread).
The presenter seems to be one of those... [note that the producer decided the initial cut of the program was biased and forced her to include a heart surgeon]...
That is a different issue, people that choose to not have statins do not affect others.