Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Wheel alignments - a word of warning.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    1,643
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Wheel alignments - a word of warning.

    I'm not usually one to complain, but I've had four wheel alignments over the years from various big mobs in town (which almost covers the whole of town), and ALL of them either wanted too or have put toe in on the Rangies.

    Excessive toe in does conveniently chew tires out though...

    I'll be asking for the print out from now on.

    Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Godwin Beach Qld
    Posts
    8,688
    Total Downloaded
    0
    G'day Benji

    I gather you are talking RRC here, so from my Range Rover Classic W/shop book they are as follows:

    Front Wheel Alignment: 0.046 to 0.094 (1.2 to2.4 mm) TOE OUT
    Camber angle unladen: 0 degrees
    Caster angle unladen: 3 degrees
    Swivel Pin Inclination : 7 degrees-----unladen

    UNLADEN= vehicle empty but with water,oil,and 20 litres of fuel in it.

    NOTE:that would be with standard 205 x 16 radial tyres on standard Rostyle steel rims.

    hope that helps

    Those specs should be the same for D1's as they use the RRC chassis and running gear.

    cheers

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Free Again Thanks Dan
    Posts
    10,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by UncleHo View Post
    G'day Benji

    I gather you are talking RRC here, so from my Range Rover Classic W/shop book they are as follows:

    Front Wheel Alignment: 0.046 to 0.094 (1.2 to2.4 mm) TOE OUT
    Camber angle unladen: 0 degrees
    Caster angle unladen: 3 degrees
    Swivel Pin Inclination : 7 degrees-----unladen

    UNLADEN= vehicle empty but with water,oil,and 20 litres of fuel in it.

    NOTE:that would be with standard 205 x 16 radial tyres on standard Rostyle steel rims.

    hope that helps

    Those specs should be the same for D1's as they use the RRC chassis and running gear.

    cheers
    And in saying this why do some pay for it where anyone with a tape measure and a couple of spanners can have it done in no time

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,804
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rangieman View Post
    And in saying this why do some pay for it where anyone with a tape measure and a couple of spanners can have it done in no time
    Because a lazer has a degree of accuracy. That is like asking why some pay to have their cars spray painted when, with a six inch brush and a couple of litres of house paint it can be done in no time.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Godwin Beach Qld
    Posts
    8,688
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Don't forget Benji that all your radius bushes need to be in good condition both front and rear, or it will throw any wheel alignment out, and cause you vehicle to track crabwise a little therefore scrubbing the tyres,I have seen both Holdens and Falcons with this problem,it is easily seen from a following vehicle.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    1,643
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes, its purely for accuracy.

    My 93 had the least amount of tire wear at .8 mm toe out, so it does differ for every vehicle. But had to literally swear at the bloke for him to do it.

    I just had the p38 done by a place that was recomended as knowing 4wds, and they set it to 1mm toe in - since fixed that to 1mm toe out - just a bit peeved that's all.

    I might bite the bullet and buy a laser machine myself.



    Sent from my GT-I9305T using AULRO mobile app

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Free Again Thanks Dan
    Posts
    10,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by V8Ian View Post
    Because a lazer has a degree of accuracy. That is like asking why some pay to have their cars spray painted when, with a six inch brush and a couple of litres of house paint it can be done in no time.
    Each to their own The cars i have owned in the past ect RRC x3 , Defender x2 and a D1 i have all done with a tape measure with ill effect to tyre wear or handling
    Luck maybe but seriously those models only have toe in toe out adjustment it aint rocket science and the wheel does not need to be reinvented for something so simple

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gosnells
    Posts
    6,148
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As a wheel alignment techie explained to me way back in the last century...

    Rear-wheel drive cars have toe IN, as the rolling resistance/drag from being pushed from the back only, tends to force the front wheels backwards and thus compresses and flexes the suspension components. Nett result is:- front wheels pointing pretty well dead-ahead under speed.

    Front-wheel drive cars are set toe-OUT, as the 'pulling' of the front wheels flexes everything so that the wheels try to go forward and leave the car behind, and the end result is... Front wheels point dead-ahead. (More or less....)

    All-wheel drive cars such as a D1/2 or Rangie are sort-of somewhere between, and I suspect can be more finicky when setting and more easily influenced by tyres, driving techniques, condition of suspension components -as has been mentioned as Very Important - and the price of Tea in China.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    392
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by superquag View Post
    As a wheel alignment techie explained to me way back in the last century...

    Rear-wheel drive cars have toe IN, as the rolling resistance/drag from being pushed from the back only, tends to force the front wheels backwards and thus compresses and flexes the suspension components. Nett result is:- front wheels pointing pretty well dead-ahead under speed.

    Front-wheel drive cars are set toe-OUT, as the 'pulling' of the front wheels flexes everything so that the wheels try to go forward and leave the car behind, and the end result is... Front wheels point dead-ahead. (More or less....)

    All-wheel drive cars such as a D1/2 or Rangie are sort-of somewhere between, and I suspect can be more finicky when setting and more easily influenced by tyres, driving techniques, condition of suspension components -as has been mentioned as Very Important - and the price of Tea in China.
    This maybe so in CV joint driven, independent front suspension vehicles but in a vehicle with a live axle I would be surprised if the axle housing flexes that much..... I have set my toe adjustment for years with around 1 to 2 mm toe out, tyre wear and steering effort has always been good

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gosnells
    Posts
    6,148
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Agree. (BTW, thanks for the idea of only 1 to 2mm toe-out)
    I understood his explanation as including the steering joints and hinges etc, as well as the straight-out suspension rubbers and bushes. Lots of tiny amounts of free-play to add up.

    I'd hate to think the LR axle housings flex to a measureable amount during normal road-running...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!