That's a joke!!!
Well I finally got a reply from LRA, if this is what you could call it and NOTE, this is the ONLY correspondence I have EVER received, you will understand when you read the reply.
All I can say is I'm speechless!
Dear Mr ######,
*
We understand that you have posted some comments regarding your vehicle on an internet forum regarding your Range Rover Vogue indicating you have not had a reply from Land Rover Customer Care.
*
Thank you for your loyalty to the brand and naturally, we very much regret to learn that the ownership experience of your Range Rover has not lived up to your expectations. We ask you to accept our sincere apologies for any inconvenience caused by us not replying sooner.
*
Regarding the concern with seat trim that was raised with ( DEALER’S NAME ) Land Rover, it was noted as a wear and tear item as per previous dealership advice and as such was a retail repair. We understand this decision was conveyed at the time as per your correspondence.
*
If you have further concerns with your vehicle then we recommend presenting your vehicle to an authorised Land Rover dealership for repairs.
*
Land Rover Australia issued your vehicle with a Three Year (3) or 100,000KM (which ever occurred first) New Car Warranty on the 30th of November 2007. This warranty was in place to cover the owner for any costs associated with unforeseeable defects in manufacture, within the timeframe.
*
Land Rover Australia is not in a position to assist financially to your vehicle due to the age of vehicle. While we understand this may not be the answer you were looking for, but we are bound by the terms and conditions of the new car warranty.
*
We hope this clarifies our position in regards to this matter.
*
Yours sincerely
*
#### ########
Customer Care Manager
Land Rover Australia
That's a joke!!!
In a perfect world maybe. I spent much of my working life in the motor and machinery industries and know how persistent warranty complainers are regarded inside the dealership. Even if in the right you can wear out your welcome. Something like the foreman looking at the booking list "That f'ing whinger is booked in again! What for this time? Brakes? Again? We've fixed the bloody things four times. Patch it up and get rid of him. The Service Rep wanted to disallow our last claim." Or the Dealer Principal viewing the service accounts "Why are we still fluffing around with this *****? Tell him no more and give him the Service Rep's phone number. Don't do any more unless the rep approves it and pays retail."
Solmanic and Drivesafe have found out the hard way that there is a limit to warranty even if not ethical.
As SuperMono says, Ford and Toyota will limit claims. Toyota used to refuse warranty on items they regarded as design faults and built in to the vehicle. You bought it that way, so wear it was their philosophy.
URSUSMAJOR
Yeah! Brian that is exactly how the conversations used to go in a LeyLand dealershipI have been part of that type of conversation many times.
Part of my job was to inspect parts and access wheather it was warranty or abuseand the pendulum always swung in favour of abuse/hard use
![]()
Doesn't solve all problems. Back when VWs were in the news my wife's Transporter was intermittently stopping. Unpredictable, weeks between events but would suddenly "fail to progress" with all systems shutting down. Would restart without problems though. But that's no consolation if you've hit something!
We had it at the local VW dealers for ages. They refused to believe there was a problem then eventually told us it was probably the gear box about to die and they could replace it for $15,000. It was clearly BS intended to make us take our vehicle away and stop causing trouble.
Took it to an independent auto mechanic who checked on a web forum (!) and discovered it was a common problem with a corroded plug. Replaced plug, no further problem.
If the dealers have a "don't bother us" attitude then the importer can be great but it won't matter.
I've been off the forum for ages, drivesafe, but I well recall the early months of your ownership of that vehicle. Sorry to hear the experience didn't improve.
Steve
2003 Discovery 2a
In better care:
1992 Defender
1963 Series IIa Ambulance
1977 Series III Ex-Army
1988 County V8
1981 V8 Series 3 "Stage 1"
REMLR No. 215
Wonder why they wrote such a long reply, when all they had to say was
Dear Mr ######,
**** off.
Love,
Land Rover Australia
I try not to get involved in these threads, but that reply shows a clear lack of understanding of the issue and a lack of care on their part. If nothing else it is an example of very unprofessional business correspondence and suggests that the writer is perhaps not in the right job.
I really do hope you have the stamina to pursue this and can reach a satisfactory outcome.
Cheers,
Jon
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks