Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: proposed sweeping powers for fair trading inspectors

  1. #11
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,530
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ramblingboy42 View Post
    depends who's in power and what value the upper house is to them.....Paul Keating called it "unrepresentative swill" , if I remember correctly.
    I think you remember correctly - but he was talking about the Senate, which almost always is a much closer representation of the voting pattern than is the House of Representatives.

    At abolition the Qld upper house was fully appointed (effectively by the government of the day, but they could not get rid of those appointed by the previous government).

    These days I think the main distinction of the state upper houses is that they have longer terms (e.g. NSW elects half at a time), so that the composition of the upper house reflects long term trends rather than short lived landslide victories. They also often have multimember electorates - for example, currently NSW has the whole state as an electorate, giving proportional representation, arguably much more representative than the single member electorates of the lower house.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    I think you remember correctly - but he was talking about the Senate, which almost always is a much closer representation of the voting pattern than is the House of Representatives.

    At abolition the Qld upper house was fully appointed (effectively by the government of the day, but they could not get rid of those appointed by the previous government).

    These days I think the main distinction of the state upper houses is that they have longer terms (e.g. NSW elects half at a time), so that the composition of the upper house reflects long term trends rather than short lived landslide victories. They also often have multimember electorates - for example, currently NSW has the whole state as an electorate, giving proportional representation, arguably much more representative than the single member electorates of the lower house.

    John
    Some other prominente, I forget who, referred to the Senate as the best club in Australia. I prefer Keating's version, given that it always appears to be full of seat warmers and ratbags.
    URSUSMAJOR

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!