the political correctness and do gooders have gone too far

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bee utey

And for the conservatives it's always about money. "Their" money. That they contribute to make the society they live in work better. Oscar Wilde said it best:



Luckily there's a reasonable percentage of feeling, sane people in Australia who want to live in a better society and are damned proud to contribute their bit.

---

"There is only one thing worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DiscoMick

But don't we have a 'right to be bigots' now, according to our loony Attorney General, Senator George Brandis, who is a disgrace to the country. My relatives didn't fight to protect the freedom to be a bigot, I know that for certain.

Sent from my GT-P5210 using AULRO mobile app

---

I agree with you DiscoMick , it is a fact that anyone has a 'right' to be a bigot.

That does not give that person a right to inflict or force bigotted opinions upon others who are not.

Senator George Brandis , by his meanderings , alludes common people to believe that it is acceptable.....which it is not.

He should be encouraging integrated honesty in the country , not bigotry , but that would threaten and destroy his very existence.

He's just justifying Cory Bernardi's presence in the senate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frantic

And it's pretty obvious if a hetro male Pedo walks into the girls room, not so obvious if he's dressed as a she . A lot of people who are gender variable are straight, others swing, whilst others play the home team. Of all thoese it would be naive to believe none where evil.
I was referring to the stupid seen most in religious clicks in hospital where they refuse certain treatments even of it kills them, how long till a stupid X insists on treatment or refuses it of/for a male/ female issue when they don't have the bits in reality. But it will make a funny video:wasntme:

---

Where is the evidence of these gender variable definitions you speak of? Or is it something you thought up yourself?

Where is the evidence TV's (cross-dresser heterosexuals) also being significantly represented as being paedophiles? It is common in media/movies but not sure the statistical evidence exists to back that up.

Not that this is the point of this thread.

I didn't say you couldn't be a bigot, just that they want exactly what you have. No fanfare, no special treatment etc. Just to be in the way they want to be.

Well, all this talk about bigots, looked up in my two dictionaries, only cheap ones, the Macquarie , 4th edition, and Routledges new sixpenny dictionary, 1892.


Macquarie-- Bigot, a person who is intolerantly convinced of the rightness of a particular creed, opinion, practice, etc.


Routledge's-- A blind zealot. [ zealot- an enthusiast, over zealous]


It seems the modern definition indicates how full of it humans have become. Bob

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies

O.K. then what about:

• 47XXY Kleinfelters
• 45XO Turners
• 48XX-XY Mosaic
• 47XXX Triple X

Where do they fit?

Are you going to make them another species because they don't fit your simplistic view of the universe?

---

nope If the DNA filter opens the door for you then it opens the door for you and you can go in.

simple binary yes/no. If you happen to be able to open both doors, good on ya you get a free choice in life not many other have the opportunity to make, be proud of it.

oh and remember the original post said toilet doors, cause its the only place I could think of where it actually matters what door opens for you based on gender. my standard rule for religious nutters, homosexuals and ADG's applies "I dont care what you do as long as you dont try to involve me in it and do it way the hell over there out of my area of responsability"

Speaking of public toilets.
In the last few weeks I have had the pleasure of having to walk hand in hand with my Mrs into disabled toilets,the looks I got mainly from women I may add were disgusting,what did they think??? Going in there for a quicky???
Andrew

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies

Where is the evidence of these gender variable definitions you speak of? Or is it something you thought up yourself?

Where is the evidence TV's (cross-dresser heterosexuals) also being significantly represented as being paedophiles? It is common in media/movies but not sure the statistical evidence exists to back that up.

Not that this is the point of this thread.

---

Please read and comprehend not jump to accuse;)
Cross dressers Poeple who identify as the opposite sex, born with the wrong bits etc or other labels as politically correct , are straight, gay or bi, and i never said SIGNIFICANTLY represented as paedophiles , rather that it would be NIAEVE (simple english maybe, STUPID) to believe that none where molesters. You made the assumtion about percentages.;)
You like to label anyone who disagrees with you as homophobic , you did this several times last year in another deleted thread about scumbags abusing kids when i spoke about Bevan, Arkelll and Evans.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by frantic

Please read and comprehend not jump to accuse;)
Cross dressers Poeple who identify as the opposite sex, born with the wrong bits etc or other labels as politically correct , are straight, gay or bi, and i never said SIGNIFICANTLY represented as paedophiles , rather that it would be NIAEVE (simple english maybe, STUPID) to believe that none where molesters. You made the assumtion about percentages.;)
You like to label anyone who disagrees with you as homophobic , you did this several times last year in another deleted thread about scumbags abusing kids when i spoke about Bevan, Arkelll and Evans.

---

I read everything you said several times. You are making up terms of your own design. Nor have I called anyone in this thread homophobic, let alone you, although you do have rather excessive opinions about paedophiles.

In your previous post, you were concerned about a heterosexual man dressed as a woman being in the female toilets when your girls were in there. What other assumption could I make than that you were suggesting they were transvestite paedophiles?

Yes I did bring up the statistical issue of TV paedophiles, because they make up a very small proportion of all paedophiles. Your girls are more at risk of abuse from other family members and family friends or even the clergy than they are by someone in the wrong toilet by your definitions.

Yes I do remember the discussions about the paedophile ring in the Illawarra and your strong opinions of Mark Valera (who murdered Frank Arkell).