Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Thoughts on tyre drag.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,043
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Thoughts on tyre drag.

    Well I'm just thinking about this.

    Usually when we put bigger tyres on, our fuel consumption goes up. The question, is this because the tread create more drag, is it because our gearing changes or is it the rotational mass taking more power to turn?

    In theory the larger diameter wheel should mean a higher ratio (gearing) so we would effectivly gear up. This should get better fuel consumption on the open road becasue our engine revs will drop but maybe increasing the engine load is increasing fuel consumption. Then maybe by changing out diff or tranfer box ratios we would maintain fuel consuption.

    In theory the larger wheels would have a lesser flex angle on the road so less flexing of the tread would mean less heat, longer tyre life, less resistance and better fuel consumption.

    In theory by fitting wider tyres the contact patch area doesnt change but the contact patch goes from long and skinny to short and wide. What is gained by the contact patch being shorter, meaning less flex angle is offset by the flexing being wider. All this means the same fuel consumption.

    One possiblilty is bigger tyres carry more load so we need to run them at a lower pressure and this will then increase contact area, increase flex angle and therefore resistance. All increasing drag and fuel consumption.

    One big misconception of wider tyres is they give more grip. That may or may not be true off road as tread paterns come into play. On road, as the area increases the pressure per square reduces and therefore while the contact area is larger the friction provided by each square of that larger area is less, the end friction provided by the tyre is the same.

    Race cars use wider tyres but they gain the advantage of longer life and more durability which means they car run a softer compound and acheive the same tyre life. In normal road vehicles by fitting wider tyres we actually get less grip because the tyres will heat up less which means the rubber will stay harder and provide less grip but they will last longer. Not mentioning aquaplanning as I think most will be aware of this.

    Maybe it's the wind resistance of the larger tyres that causes the extra fuel consumption.

    All this thought has come about because I just like the look of bigger tyres. Not too big, nothing like 37" or anything but about 32" is a good look on a 4x4 just my personal preferance and as I said about the bigger size will last longer. But I don't want the extra fuel consumption so if I change my transfer box ratio to maintain the original gearing will my fuel consuption stay the same.

    Happy Days.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Douglas Park, NSW
    Posts
    9,347
    Total Downloaded
    0
    While I'm sure all your theories will have some impact on fuel consumption, the main factor is the gearing difference.


    With your average Land Rover, the engine will be working harder to maintain the speed with the higher gearing.
    You might find some economy gains on nice flat freeways though.
    Scott

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Tread pattern influence is huge.
    Go ride a bike with slick tyres and then with low pressure knobblies.

    Easiest way to measure tyre drag change is to measure your coast down times and then again with Chunkier tyres.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That's interesting Dougal. Using the coast down test you could measure actual tread drag without the consideration of gearing and wind resistance would reduce as the vehicles slowed.

    That would prove or disprove bigger tyres might roll easier but it would still leave the question is it the greater wind resistance or the gearing that causing the higher fuel cost.

    I see how the higher gearing creating more enging load could cause more fuel consumption but I doubt it a little. The ratio change is not usually that great, maybe 10%. When we consider that most vehicles actually improve fuel consumption with higher ratios like the differance in driving in 4th or 5th gears. The differance in ratio for 4th and 5th gears are far more than the ratio change in up sizing tyres.

    Some could argue the vehcile looses ratio and power for acceleration as well but that should only really effect first part of 1st gear from then on you will actually be in a lower gear for a given speed as you would hold a gear a little longer. For example if you previously changed to 2nd at 30km/h with the higher ratio provided by the bigger tyres, you'd change to 2nd at 35km/h. Meaning while the engine gets a little more load through most of the rev range, it gets it a little bit easier for the last part of the rev range.

    And to top off the gear ratio thing. Most recommendations for driving economically say to short shift and rev the motor less to save fuel which indicates to me an engine will use less fuel with low revs and heavy load than high reves and low load. I know there is a bit of lose in engine friction but is this enough to acount for the extra fuel from bigger tyres.

    Happy Days.

  5. #5
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,538
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In my view, the major factors that affect rolling losses and hence fuel consumption are:-
    1. the energy converted to heat in flexing the tyre - which almost entirely depends on the construction of the tyre and the rubber compound used, but is pretty much independent of tyre size.

    2. Energy converted to heat and sound by the tread - which again, depends entirely on the tread pattern and composition, hence is independent of tyre size, at least within the bounds of practical sizes.

    Tyre diameter affects effective gearing, but for most modern vehicles I would be surprised if it made much difference to fuel consumption, again within the limits of practical sizes. Same applies to the effects of aerodynamic drag, although this is not a simple calculation, as the turbulent airflow around the tyre will be affected by the proximity of the bodywork.

    Tyre pressure is of course a major factor in fuel consumption, and another one, not often recognised, is that tyre tread width also affects consumption on anything except a straight road, as on a corner the edges of the tyre are necessarily either skidded on the road or the tread flexes (depending on the tyre properties and the surface), either process converting fuel energy to heat.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm not surprise the first 2 responses to the thread, one says drag from the tyre and the other says gearing.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    1. the energy converted to heat in flexing the tyre - which almost entirely depends on the construction of the tyre and the rubber compound used, but is pretty much independent of tyre size.

    I have to disagree that it's independant of tyre size. As the diameter increases the angle the tread meets the road is reduced as such so is the flex of the tyre. So going up in size but sticking with the same model of tyre should reduce fuel consumption.

    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    2. Energy converted to heat and sound by the tread - which again, depends entirely on the tread pattern and composition, hence is independent of tyre size, at least within the bounds of practical sizes.
    Again so if sticking with the same brand and model of tyre. Fuel consumption should stay the same at least.

    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    and another one, not often recognised, is that tyre tread width also affects consumption on anything except a straight road, as on a corner the edges of the tyre are necessarily either skidded on the road or the tread flexes (depending on the tyre properties and the surface), either process converting fuel energy to heat.

    John
    Here in the NT most roads are straight and I'd wonder how much time our vehicles actually spend turning.

    I presume you are taking about slip angle?

    _______________________________________

    Everything points to bigger tyres being more fuel efficent but we all know that's just not the case so why?

    Happy Days

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've been searching and reading for a while now and I am begining to be convinced that larger tyres will have less drag and going up in size has a far bigger effect on rolling resistance (reduced) than increasing tyre pressure.

    Partly the reason fuel consumption goes up is down to the extra energy required to spin the heavier wheel but this is not relevant once desired speed is reached.

    The main reason is wind resistance. Partly from the extra width of the tyre but grossly from lifting the vehicle up even only a small amount will greatly effect aero dynamics of the vehicle, create more wind drag and ultimatly cost more fuel.

    I know from previous personal experience that lowering a vehicle, even slightly will reduce fuel consumption. I had a WRX that I lowered only 1/2" from standard and saved on average 0.5L/100km. I drove from Canberra to Bathurst plenty of times and it was immediatly obvious in my fuel consumption when I changed the suspension.

    Still open to further comments and ideas.

    Happy Days.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    213
    Total Downloaded
    0
    How are you calculating the distance traveled to get your figures.
    Don't forget the odometer will read a different distance with the different tyres fitted

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This is interesting.

    tire width vs. drag (Cd) - Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com

    The Honda CRX had a 9.3% increase in drag going from 165 to 185 tyres.

    Happy Days

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!